Invalidity dossier

US 6614545

Communication scheme for imaging systems including printers with intelligent options

Current assignee: Lexmark International Inc

Added 9/24/2026, 1:25:32 AM

At a glanceNo PTAB challengesNo litigation on file

Active provider: DeepSeek · deepseek-flash

Patent summary

Title, assignee, inventors, filing/issue dates, abstract, and a plain-language overview of the claims.

✓ Generated

Patent Overview — US 6,614,545 B1

Title: Communication scheme for imaging systems including printers with intelligent options

Patent number: US 6,614,545 B1
Application number: US 08/853,767
Inventors: David Brian Langer; Steven Wayne Parish; Edward Carlton Sharp
Original assignee / current assignee (as listed): Lexmark International, Inc.
Priority/filing date: 1997-05-09
Publication (grant) date: 2003-09-02
Legal status (as listed): Expired – Lifetime; adjusted expiration 2020-01-24

Purpose. The patent addresses communication between a printer controller and "intelligent" optional support devices (e.g., paper handling options such as input sources, output destinations, duplexing, stacking, and collating). Each intelligent option typically has its own microprocessor and microcode and is managed as a "black box." The excerpt identifies problems with prior arrangements: low-bandwidth serial links, the need to address every device individually to send a common command such as "reset," and error-reporting schemes that either reserve a response byte value (e.g., 255) or require timeout-and-retry, which cannot distinguish an ailing communications link from a device malfunction.

Plain-language scope. The system comprises a printer with a printer controller, a first optional support device with a first device controller, and a bidirectional serial communications path including a first trunkline having a unique trunkline address. The first device controller initially responds to that unique trunkline address; the printer controller automatically assigns a unique device address, commanding the first device controller to respond to a first device address. Logic circuitry continues the first trunkline through the first optional support device to the next device when enabled. The printer controller sequentially and automatically commands optional support devices to respond to unique device addresses. Plural trunklines may extend from a common electrical connection to a communication bus, each with a unique trunkline address, with each device originally programmed to respond to one such address.

Source: https://patents.google.com/patent/US6614545/en

What the excerpt does not establish. It is an excerpt only; the full specification, all claims, the drawings (FIG. 1 and FIG. 2 are referenced but only partially described), and the complete prosecution history are not reproduced. The excerpt does not establish the exact claim language or claim count, the specific error-reporting mechanism ultimately claimed, or the detailed operation of the automatic addressing sequence. Dates and legal status are as listed by the source and are assumptions, not legal conclusions.

Generated 10/1/2026, 9:31:25 PM

Cases on file (0)

Specific litigation cases in our database that name US patent 6614545. The free-form analysis below may also discuss cases beyond this list.

No cases on file mention this patent. Upload a CSV or add a case manually in Admin → Manage litigation cases.

Litigation summary

Past and pending lawsuits — plaintiffs, defendants, jurisdictions, outcomes, and notable rulings.

Log in to generate
Not generated yet. Log in to request this analysis.

Proceedings on file (0)

All PTAB activity →

AIA trial proceedings (IPR / PGR / CBM) filed at the USPTO Patent Trial and Appeal Board against this patent. Sourced from the USPTO Open Data Portal and refreshed every six hours; each proceeding number deep-links to the PTAB E2E docket.

No PTAB proceedings on file. This patent has not been challenged via IPR, PGR, or CBM. The absence is itself a signal — well-asserted patents eventually attract IPRs. The LLM analysis below may surface filings the ODP feed hasn’t indexed yet.

PTAB challenges

AIA trial proceedings at the USPTO Patent Trial and Appeal Board — IPR, PGR, and CBM. Petitioners, judge panels, claim-level invalidation outcomes from Final Written Decisions, and Federal Circuit appeals. The single most important defensive datapoint after litigation history.

Log in to generate
Not generated yet. Log in to request this analysis.

Assignment history

Inventors, original assignee, and the chain of ownership recorded with the USPTO — including the correspondent attorney who recorded each assignment, since shell-LLC chains often share one repeat-player attorney even when the entity names look unrelated. Surfaces NPE / patent-troll patterns: shell-entity transfers, known asserters in the chain, repeat correspondent fingerprints, pre-litigation assignments, and bankruptcy fire-sales.

Log in to generate
Not generated yet. Log in to request this analysis.

Prior art

Earlier patents, publications, and products that may anticipate or render the claims unpatentable.

Log in to generate
Not generated yet. Log in to request this analysis.

Obviousness

Combinations of prior art that suggest the claimed invention would have been obvious under 35 U.S.C. § 103.

Log in to generate
Not generated yet. Log in to request this analysis.

Extensions

Patent term adjustments, term extensions, continuations, divisionals, family members, and expiration dates.

Log in to generate
Not generated yet. Log in to request this analysis.

Derivative works

Defensive disclosure: derivative variations of each claim designed to render future incremental improvements obvious or non-novel.

Log in to generate
Not generated yet. Log in to request this analysis.