Invalidity dossier

US 6565225

Bar-shaped light guide, beam lighting device using the bar-shaped light guide, and surface lighting device using the beam lighting device

Current assignee: Sanyo Electric Co Ltd

Added 9/23/2026, 5:52:02 PM

At a glanceNo PTAB challengesNo litigation on file

Active provider: DeepSeek · deepseek-flash

Patent summary

Title, assignee, inventors, filing/issue dates, abstract, and a plain-language overview of the claims.

✓ Generated

Patent Overview — US 6,565,225 B2

Title: Bar-shaped light guide, beam lighting device using the bar-shaped light guide, and surface lighting device using the beam lighting device

Assignee: Sanyo Electric Co., Ltd. Inventors: Koji Mabuchi, Youichiro Goto, Toru Nose, Nobuo Iwatsuki. Application: US 09/906,846, filed 2001-07-18. Priority date: 2000-07-19. Granted/published: 2003-05-20. Status (as listed): Expired – Fee Related, adjusted expiration 2021-10-02. Source: https://patents.google.com/patent/US6565225/en

Purpose. The patent addresses utilization efficiency of light entering a bar-shaped light guide from a point light source (e.g., an LED). In the described background arrangement, the guide is a right prism with a rectangular cross-section and uniform thickness, so the reflecting surface is parallel to the light's optical axis; much incident light never reaches the reflecting surface or the V-shaped grooves, reducing efficiency. Light emitted from the light-emitting surface also required a diffusing sheet and lens sheet for correction, raising cost and assembly steps.

Plain-language scope (per the excerpt). The claimed bar-shaped light guide comprises: a light incident surface receiving light from a point light source; a light emitting surface orthogonal to the incident surface, emitting the received light as beam light; and a pattern surface made up of a side of the incident surface and a side of the emitting surface, including a plurality of grooves formed thereon. The excerpt begins describing the grooves but is truncated at that point, so their full geometry and arrangement are not established here. The document also contemplates a beam lighting device using the guide and a surface lighting device using that beam lighting device. Classifications include G02B6/0038 (linear indentations or grooves extending over the full length or width of the light guide) and G02B6/0061 (varying density, size, shape or depth along the light guide to provide homogeneous light output intensity).

What the excerpt does not establish. It does not provide the complete claim text, the full description of groove pitch/depth, all drawing content, or the specific claims distinguishing the invention from the cited JP 2000-11723 A. It states no litigation, ownership-transfer, or validity conclusions.

Generated 10/1/2026, 9:43:14 PM

Cases on file (0)

Specific litigation cases in our database that name US patent 6565225. The free-form analysis below may also discuss cases beyond this list.

No cases on file mention this patent. Upload a CSV or add a case manually in Admin → Manage litigation cases.

Litigation summary

Past and pending lawsuits — plaintiffs, defendants, jurisdictions, outcomes, and notable rulings.

Log in to generate
Not generated yet. Log in to request this analysis.

Proceedings on file (0)

All PTAB activity →

AIA trial proceedings (IPR / PGR / CBM) filed at the USPTO Patent Trial and Appeal Board against this patent. Sourced from the USPTO Open Data Portal and refreshed every six hours; each proceeding number deep-links to the PTAB E2E docket.

No PTAB proceedings on file. This patent has not been challenged via IPR, PGR, or CBM. The absence is itself a signal — well-asserted patents eventually attract IPRs. The LLM analysis below may surface filings the ODP feed hasn’t indexed yet.

PTAB challenges

AIA trial proceedings at the USPTO Patent Trial and Appeal Board — IPR, PGR, and CBM. Petitioners, judge panels, claim-level invalidation outcomes from Final Written Decisions, and Federal Circuit appeals. The single most important defensive datapoint after litigation history.

Log in to generate
Not generated yet. Log in to request this analysis.

Assignment history

Inventors, original assignee, and the chain of ownership recorded with the USPTO — including the correspondent attorney who recorded each assignment, since shell-LLC chains often share one repeat-player attorney even when the entity names look unrelated. Surfaces NPE / patent-troll patterns: shell-entity transfers, known asserters in the chain, repeat correspondent fingerprints, pre-litigation assignments, and bankruptcy fire-sales.

Log in to generate
Not generated yet. Log in to request this analysis.

Prior art

Earlier patents, publications, and products that may anticipate or render the claims unpatentable.

Log in to generate
Not generated yet. Log in to request this analysis.

Obviousness

Combinations of prior art that suggest the claimed invention would have been obvious under 35 U.S.C. § 103.

Log in to generate
Not generated yet. Log in to request this analysis.

Extensions

Patent term adjustments, term extensions, continuations, divisionals, family members, and expiration dates.

Log in to generate
Not generated yet. Log in to request this analysis.

Derivative works

Defensive disclosure: derivative variations of each claim designed to render future incremental improvements obvious or non-novel.

Log in to generate
Not generated yet. Log in to request this analysis.