Invalidity dossier
US 6516063
Echo canceller having improved non-linear processor
Current assignee: Coriant Operations Inc
Added 9/23/2026, 4:51:38 PM
Active provider: DeepSeek · deepseek-flash
Patent summary
Title, assignee, inventors, filing/issue dates, abstract, and a plain-language overview of the claims.
Patent Overview: US 6,516,063 B1
Title: Echo canceller having improved non-linear processor
Patent number: US 6,516,063 B1
Inventors: David S. Farrell; Tianfang Liu
Original assignee: Tellabs Operations Inc. (current assignee listed as Coriant Operations Inc.)
Application number: US09/535,305
Priority date: 1997-11-14
Filing date: 2000-03-24
Publication (grant) date: 2003-02-04
Legal status: Expired – Lifetime (anticipated expiration 2017-11-14)
Classification: H04B3/23 (echo cancellers using a replica of the transmitted signal in the time domain); H04B3/234 (double-talk detection); H04M9/082 (loud-speaking telephone systems using echo cancellers)
Purpose. The patent relates generally to echo cancellation and, more specifically, to an echo canceller including an improved non-linear processor with adaptive thresholding. Echo cancellers monitor the receive channel of a four-wire circuit, generate estimates of expected echoes, and subtract those estimates from the transmit channel. Conventional adaptive cancellers are described as susceptible to sub-optimal performance during "double talk" (both parties speaking concurrently) and to non-linear echo paths. The present inventors recognized that a dual-H architecture — a non-adaptive filter h combined with an adaptive filter — may itself assist in detecting a non-linear echo path.
Plain-language scope. A non-linear processor includes a center-clipping digital filter receiving an echo-compensated signal and producing a center-clipped output with non-linear thresholds at +T_NLP and −T_NLP. The value of T_NLP is dynamically dependent, at least in part, on echo return loss measurements. Dynamic setting of T_NLP is inhibited when double talk is present, and the echo return loss measurement is locked after a predetermined number of consecutive measurements fall within a predetermined range of one another, reducing susceptibility to corruption from double-talk conditions.
Source: https://patents.google.com/patent/US6516063/en
What the excerpt does not establish. The supplied text is excerpted; the detailed description, some drawing descriptions, and the claims are omitted. It therefore does not establish the full claim scope, the complete mathematical formulations (equations appear incomplete), or the specific implementation details of the filters S, M, and L and other figures.
Generated 10/1/2026, 9:44:05 PM
Cases on file (0)
Specific litigation cases in our database that name US patent 6516063. The free-form analysis below may also discuss cases beyond this list.
No cases on file mention this patent. Upload a CSV or add a case manually in Admin → Manage litigation cases.
Litigation summary
Past and pending lawsuits — plaintiffs, defendants, jurisdictions, outcomes, and notable rulings.
Proceedings on file (0)
All PTAB activity →AIA trial proceedings (IPR / PGR / CBM) filed at the USPTO Patent Trial and Appeal Board against this patent. Sourced from the USPTO Open Data Portal and refreshed every six hours; each proceeding number deep-links to the PTAB E2E docket.
No PTAB proceedings on file. This patent has not been challenged via IPR, PGR, or CBM. The absence is itself a signal — well-asserted patents eventually attract IPRs. The LLM analysis below may surface filings the ODP feed hasn’t indexed yet.
PTAB challenges
AIA trial proceedings at the USPTO Patent Trial and Appeal Board — IPR, PGR, and CBM. Petitioners, judge panels, claim-level invalidation outcomes from Final Written Decisions, and Federal Circuit appeals. The single most important defensive datapoint after litigation history.
Assignment history
Inventors, original assignee, and the chain of ownership recorded with the USPTO — including the correspondent attorney who recorded each assignment, since shell-LLC chains often share one repeat-player attorney even when the entity names look unrelated. Surfaces NPE / patent-troll patterns: shell-entity transfers, known asserters in the chain, repeat correspondent fingerprints, pre-litigation assignments, and bankruptcy fire-sales.
Prior art
Earlier patents, publications, and products that may anticipate or render the claims unpatentable.
Obviousness
Combinations of prior art that suggest the claimed invention would have been obvious under 35 U.S.C. § 103.
Extensions
Patent term adjustments, term extensions, continuations, divisionals, family members, and expiration dates.
Derivative works
Defensive disclosure: derivative variations of each claim designed to render future incremental improvements obvious or non-novel.