Invalidity dossier

US 6246179

Emissive element and display device using such element

Current assignee: Sanyo Electric Co Ltd

Added 9/23/2026, 2:52:00 PM

At a glanceNo PTAB challengesNo litigation on file

Active provider: DeepSeek · deepseek-flash

Patent summary

Title, assignee, inventors, filing/issue dates, abstract, and a plain-language overview of the claims.

✓ Generated

Patent Overview — US 6,246,179 B1

Title: "Emissive element and display device using such element"

Assignee: Sanyo Electric Co., Ltd. (original assignee; listed current assignee also Sanyo Electric Co., Ltd.)

Inventor: Tsutomu Yamada

Key dates: Priority date 1998-12-01 (JP 10341857A; also JP 30712699A, 1999-10-28); filing date 1999-11-30 (US 09/451,457); granted/published 2001-06-12. Status listed as "Expired - Lifetime" (anticipated expiration 2019-11-30).

Purpose: The patent addresses problems in active-matrix EL (electroluminescence) displays in which a thin-film transistor (TFT) and organic EL element are stacked per pixel. The excerpt identifies: poor coverage of the very thin emissive element layer (generally under 2000 Å) at uneven portions near the periphery of the anode; electric-field concentration at anode edges accelerating emissive-layer deterioration; and emitted light reaching the underlying TFT, increasing leakage current and degrading stability. Stated purposes are to prevent cathode–anode short circuits from emissive-element disconnection caused by anode thickness, reduce deterioration from field concentration at anode edges, and prevent emissive light from reaching the TFT for stable display.

Plain-language scope: The emissive element/display device has an emissive region formed by laminating a first electrode, an emissive element layer, and a second electrode. An insulating film is disposed on at least a peripheral portion of the first electrode to separate it from the emissive element layer and/or the second electrode. In the display device, each pixel has such an emissive element; the first electrode is separately formed per pixel, with its peripheral portion covered by the insulating film. The insulating film is disposed between the first electrode and the emissive element layer and overlaps the first electrode along the entire peripheral portion outlining it.

Source: https://patents.google.com/patent/US6246179/en

Not established by this excerpt: the full claim set and their exact scope; the complete specification, drawings, and omitted text; the cited prior art; and any litigation, ownership transfers, validity, or legal-status conclusions (the source itself notes legal status is an assumption, not a legal conclusion).

Generated 10/1/2026, 9:51:53 PM

Cases on file (0)

Specific litigation cases in our database that name US patent 6246179. The free-form analysis below may also discuss cases beyond this list.

No cases on file mention this patent. Upload a CSV or add a case manually in Admin → Manage litigation cases.

Litigation summary

Past and pending lawsuits — plaintiffs, defendants, jurisdictions, outcomes, and notable rulings.

Log in to generate
Not generated yet. Log in to request this analysis.

Proceedings on file (0)

All PTAB activity →

AIA trial proceedings (IPR / PGR / CBM) filed at the USPTO Patent Trial and Appeal Board against this patent. Sourced from the USPTO Open Data Portal and refreshed every six hours; each proceeding number deep-links to the PTAB E2E docket.

No PTAB proceedings on file. This patent has not been challenged via IPR, PGR, or CBM. The absence is itself a signal — well-asserted patents eventually attract IPRs. The LLM analysis below may surface filings the ODP feed hasn’t indexed yet.

PTAB challenges

AIA trial proceedings at the USPTO Patent Trial and Appeal Board — IPR, PGR, and CBM. Petitioners, judge panels, claim-level invalidation outcomes from Final Written Decisions, and Federal Circuit appeals. The single most important defensive datapoint after litigation history.

Log in to generate
Not generated yet. Log in to request this analysis.

Assignment history

Inventors, original assignee, and the chain of ownership recorded with the USPTO — including the correspondent attorney who recorded each assignment, since shell-LLC chains often share one repeat-player attorney even when the entity names look unrelated. Surfaces NPE / patent-troll patterns: shell-entity transfers, known asserters in the chain, repeat correspondent fingerprints, pre-litigation assignments, and bankruptcy fire-sales.

Log in to generate
Not generated yet. Log in to request this analysis.

Prior art

Earlier patents, publications, and products that may anticipate or render the claims unpatentable.

Log in to generate
Not generated yet. Log in to request this analysis.

Obviousness

Combinations of prior art that suggest the claimed invention would have been obvious under 35 U.S.C. § 103.

Log in to generate
Not generated yet. Log in to request this analysis.

Extensions

Patent term adjustments, term extensions, continuations, divisionals, family members, and expiration dates.

Log in to generate
Not generated yet. Log in to request this analysis.

Derivative works

Defensive disclosure: derivative variations of each claim designed to render future incremental improvements obvious or non-novel.

Log in to generate
Not generated yet. Log in to request this analysis.