Invalidity dossier

US 6235224

Process for preparing microparticles through phase inversion phenomena

Current assignee: Brown University Research Foundation Inc

Added 9/23/2026, 4:25:14 PM

At a glanceNo PTAB challengesNo litigation on file

Active provider: DeepSeek · deepseek-flash

Patent summary

Title, assignee, inventors, filing/issue dates, abstract, and a plain-language overview of the claims.

✓ Generated

Patent Overview — US 6,235,224 B1

Title: Process for preparing microparticles through phase inversion phenomena

Patent number: US 6,235,224 B1
Application number: US09/442,723
Filing date: 1999-11-18
Publication/grant date: 2001-05-22
Prior art date: 1995-07-21 (listed as the priority date)
Original assignee / current assignee (as listed): Brown University Research Foundation Inc
Inventors: Edith Mathiowitz; Donald Chickering, III; Yong S. Jong; Jules S. Jacob
Legal status (as listed): Expired – Lifetime; anticipated expiration 2016-07-03

Purpose. The patent concerns a manufacturing process for making microparticles — referred to in the text as microspheres, microcapsules, nanospheres and nanoparticles — through phase inversion phenomena. The recurring terms in the supplied text (polymer, solvent, nonsolvent, spontaneous emulsification) indicate that polymer microparticles form when a polymer-containing phase is contacted with a nonsolvent, rather than requiring conventional emulsification equipment.

Plain-language scope. Based only on the supplied text, the process uses a polymer and a solvent, and contacting the polymer phase with a nonsolvent causes spontaneous formation of microparticles. Optional features mentioned include stirring, agitation, emulsification, and loading of a drug or other "core material"/"bioactive agent" into the particles. The disclosure names many possible materials, for example polylactic acid, polyanhydrides, polysiloxanes, polystyrene, polycaprolactone, zein, cellulose, and polyvinylpyrrolidone, along with solvents such as dichloromethane, diethyl ether, acetone, ethanol, hexane, toluene and water, and substances such as insulin, dicoumarol, salicylic acid, rhodamine B, DNA and plasmid. Application contexts mentioned include bioadhesive and delivery/transportation uses, and uptake via epithelium and Peyer's patch.

Source: https://patents.google.com/patent/US6235224/en

What the excerpt does not establish. The supplied text is metadata plus keyword-frequency fragments; it does not include the actual claim language, the written description, the abstract, references, or any legal conclusion. Accordingly, claim scope, claim count, dependencies, examples, and the legal significance of the listed dates or expiration status cannot be verified from this excerpt.

Generated 10/1/2026, 9:50:54 PM

Cases on file (0)

Specific litigation cases in our database that name US patent 6235224. The free-form analysis below may also discuss cases beyond this list.

No cases on file mention this patent. Upload a CSV or add a case manually in Admin → Manage litigation cases.

Litigation summary

Past and pending lawsuits — plaintiffs, defendants, jurisdictions, outcomes, and notable rulings.

Log in to generate
Not generated yet. Log in to request this analysis.

Proceedings on file (0)

All PTAB activity →

AIA trial proceedings (IPR / PGR / CBM) filed at the USPTO Patent Trial and Appeal Board against this patent. Sourced from the USPTO Open Data Portal and refreshed every six hours; each proceeding number deep-links to the PTAB E2E docket.

No PTAB proceedings on file. This patent has not been challenged via IPR, PGR, or CBM. The absence is itself a signal — well-asserted patents eventually attract IPRs. The LLM analysis below may surface filings the ODP feed hasn’t indexed yet.

PTAB challenges

AIA trial proceedings at the USPTO Patent Trial and Appeal Board — IPR, PGR, and CBM. Petitioners, judge panels, claim-level invalidation outcomes from Final Written Decisions, and Federal Circuit appeals. The single most important defensive datapoint after litigation history.

Log in to generate
Not generated yet. Log in to request this analysis.

Assignment history

Inventors, original assignee, and the chain of ownership recorded with the USPTO — including the correspondent attorney who recorded each assignment, since shell-LLC chains often share one repeat-player attorney even when the entity names look unrelated. Surfaces NPE / patent-troll patterns: shell-entity transfers, known asserters in the chain, repeat correspondent fingerprints, pre-litigation assignments, and bankruptcy fire-sales.

Log in to generate
Not generated yet. Log in to request this analysis.

Prior art

Earlier patents, publications, and products that may anticipate or render the claims unpatentable.

Log in to generate
Not generated yet. Log in to request this analysis.

Obviousness

Combinations of prior art that suggest the claimed invention would have been obvious under 35 U.S.C. § 103.

Log in to generate
Not generated yet. Log in to request this analysis.

Extensions

Patent term adjustments, term extensions, continuations, divisionals, family members, and expiration dates.

Log in to generate
Not generated yet. Log in to request this analysis.

Derivative works

Defensive disclosure: derivative variations of each claim designed to render future incremental improvements obvious or non-novel.

Log in to generate
Not generated yet. Log in to request this analysis.