Invalidity dossier

US 6131730

Added 9/23/2026, 3:59:06 PM

At a glanceNo PTAB challengesNo litigation on file

Active provider: DeepSeek · deepseek-flash

Patent summary

Title, assignee, inventors, filing/issue dates, abstract, and a plain-language overview of the claims.

✓ Generated

Patent Overview — US 6,131,730 A

Title: Stackable container case

Patent number: US 6,131,730 A
Application number: US 09/309,932
Inventor: Roger S. Hsu
Original assignee / current assignee (as listed): Rehrig Pacific Company (Rehrig Pacific Co Inc)
Priority / filing date: 1999-05-11
Publication (grant) date: 2000-10-17
Legal status as listed: Expired – Lifetime (anticipated expiration 2019-05-11)
Source: https://patents.google.com/patent/US6131730/en

Purpose: The case is a stackable container case for retaining and transporting cans and other containers (e.g., bottles, canned goods). It is intended to be reasonably inexpensive, lightweight and sturdy, to retain containers under rough handling, to have sufficient stiffness, to be easily stored and transported with or without goods, to be reusable with a long use life, and to nest with similar empty cases for storage.

Plain-language scope (from the supplied excerpt): A plastic case molded integrally as a unitary structure has opposing side walls (12, 14), opposing end walls (16, 18) forming an outer shell, and a bottom panel (20) disposed substantially within the shell. The side walls include a lower wall portion (22) and spaced upwardly projecting pylons, including four corner pylons (24, 30). Spaced upwardly projecting columns (52, 54) cooperate with the bottom panel, side walls and end walls to define can-retaining pockets (36–46). Each end wall includes an integrally molded handle structure suspended proximate to the end wall between upper portions of adjacent corner pylons, defining a generally open end wall area below the handle, plus an integrally molded structural reinforcement member extending between adjacent corner pylons below the handle and spaced sufficiently away from it to avoid interfering with grasping. Raised ribs on side walls and/or pylons add torsional strength, provide an interference fit for containers, and define a recess with the bottom panel to receive a container lip or bottle bottom. A six-container case is described as about 1.5 times as long as wide, holding cans in a 3×2 relationship; the described embodiment receives No. 10 cans.

Not established by this excerpt: the full claim text and exact claim scope, all figures' details, the complete written description (the excerpt is expressly partial), any prior-art references, and the identity or scope of classification-based subject matter beyond the listed classes. No litigation, ownership-transfer, validity or prior-art analysis is provided or implied.

Generated 10/1/2026, 9:51:15 PM

Cases on file (0)

Specific litigation cases in our database that name US patent 6131730. The free-form analysis below may also discuss cases beyond this list.

No cases on file mention this patent. Upload a CSV or add a case manually in Admin → Manage litigation cases.

Litigation summary

Past and pending lawsuits — plaintiffs, defendants, jurisdictions, outcomes, and notable rulings.

Log in to generate
Not generated yet. Log in to request this analysis.

Proceedings on file (0)

All PTAB activity →

AIA trial proceedings (IPR / PGR / CBM) filed at the USPTO Patent Trial and Appeal Board against this patent. Sourced from the USPTO Open Data Portal and refreshed every six hours; each proceeding number deep-links to the PTAB E2E docket.

No PTAB proceedings on file. This patent has not been challenged via IPR, PGR, or CBM. The absence is itself a signal — well-asserted patents eventually attract IPRs. The LLM analysis below may surface filings the ODP feed hasn’t indexed yet.

PTAB challenges

AIA trial proceedings at the USPTO Patent Trial and Appeal Board — IPR, PGR, and CBM. Petitioners, judge panels, claim-level invalidation outcomes from Final Written Decisions, and Federal Circuit appeals. The single most important defensive datapoint after litigation history.

Log in to generate
Not generated yet. Log in to request this analysis.

Assignment history

Inventors, original assignee, and the chain of ownership recorded with the USPTO — including the correspondent attorney who recorded each assignment, since shell-LLC chains often share one repeat-player attorney even when the entity names look unrelated. Surfaces NPE / patent-troll patterns: shell-entity transfers, known asserters in the chain, repeat correspondent fingerprints, pre-litigation assignments, and bankruptcy fire-sales.

Log in to generate
Not generated yet. Log in to request this analysis.

Prior art

Earlier patents, publications, and products that may anticipate or render the claims unpatentable.

Log in to generate
Not generated yet. Log in to request this analysis.

Obviousness

Combinations of prior art that suggest the claimed invention would have been obvious under 35 U.S.C. § 103.

Log in to generate
Not generated yet. Log in to request this analysis.

Extensions

Patent term adjustments, term extensions, continuations, divisionals, family members, and expiration dates.

Log in to generate
Not generated yet. Log in to request this analysis.

Derivative works

Defensive disclosure: derivative variations of each claim designed to render future incremental improvements obvious or non-novel.

Log in to generate
Not generated yet. Log in to request this analysis.