Invalidity dossier

US 6020923

Method and apparatus for coding and recording an image signal and recording medium for storing an image signal

Current assignee: Sony Corp

Added 9/23/2026, 2:00:34 PM

At a glanceNo PTAB challengesNo litigation on file

Active provider: DeepSeek · deepseek-flash

Patent summary

Title, assignee, inventors, filing/issue dates, abstract, and a plain-language overview of the claims.

✓ Generated

US6020923A — Patent Overview

Title: Method and apparatus for coding and recording an image signal and recording medium for storing an image signal

Patent number: US6020923A
Application number: US08/882,889
Inventors: Kazuhisa Hosaka; Yoichi Yagasaki
Assignee: Sony Corporation (original and current assignee listed)
Priority date: 1996-07-01
Filing date: 1997-06-26
Publication/grant date: 2000-02-01
Legal status (as fetched): Expired – Fee Related; anticipated expiration 2017-06-26
Classifications: H04N7/122; H04N19/30 (hierarchical/scalable coding); H04N19/503 (predictive coding with temporal prediction)

Purpose: The patent addresses coding, decoding, and recording of image signals for transmission over various lines (analog/digital telephone, private data lines) at various rates, and for recording onto media such as magnetic disks or RAM of various capacities. It applies hierarchical coding, in which a high resolution image is predicted from a low resolution image; the low resolution image is coded first, then the high resolution image is predicted from it, and the difference between the actual and predicted high resolution image is coded into the same bitstream. This is described as more efficient than coding both images directly. The technique is noted as suitable for hard key signals (bilevel shape signals used to extract an object from a fill image and combine it with a background), which the text says conventional MMR, chain coding, and quad tree techniques cannot code highly efficiently.

Plain-language scope: A coder codes the low resolution image. A judgement unit divides the predicted high resolution image into n×m pixel blocks, detects each block's feature, and outputs a judgement code. A second coder selects a coding table based on that judgement code and codes the corresponding high resolution block using it. A decoder mirrors this: it decodes the low resolution signal, derives the predicted high resolution signal, uses the judgement code to select a coding table, and decodes the coded high resolution signal. The patent also covers coding and decoding methods and a recording medium storing the coded signal.

Source: https://patents.google.com/patent/[US6020923](/patent/US6020923)/en

What the excerpt does not establish: It does not provide the full claims, the complete description (text is marked as excerpted and ends mid-sentence), specific coding tables, block sizes, or figures (e.g., FIGS. 1–21 are not included). No litigation, ownership transfer, validity, or prior-art analysis is presented here.

Generated 10/1/2026, 9:52:37 PM

Cases on file (0)

Specific litigation cases in our database that name US patent 6020923. The free-form analysis below may also discuss cases beyond this list.

No cases on file mention this patent. Upload a CSV or add a case manually in Admin → Manage litigation cases.

Litigation summary

Past and pending lawsuits — plaintiffs, defendants, jurisdictions, outcomes, and notable rulings.

Log in to generate
Not generated yet. Log in to request this analysis.

Proceedings on file (0)

All PTAB activity →

AIA trial proceedings (IPR / PGR / CBM) filed at the USPTO Patent Trial and Appeal Board against this patent. Sourced from the USPTO Open Data Portal and refreshed every six hours; each proceeding number deep-links to the PTAB E2E docket.

No PTAB proceedings on file. This patent has not been challenged via IPR, PGR, or CBM. The absence is itself a signal — well-asserted patents eventually attract IPRs. The LLM analysis below may surface filings the ODP feed hasn’t indexed yet.

PTAB challenges

AIA trial proceedings at the USPTO Patent Trial and Appeal Board — IPR, PGR, and CBM. Petitioners, judge panels, claim-level invalidation outcomes from Final Written Decisions, and Federal Circuit appeals. The single most important defensive datapoint after litigation history.

Log in to generate
Not generated yet. Log in to request this analysis.

Assignment history

Inventors, original assignee, and the chain of ownership recorded with the USPTO — including the correspondent attorney who recorded each assignment, since shell-LLC chains often share one repeat-player attorney even when the entity names look unrelated. Surfaces NPE / patent-troll patterns: shell-entity transfers, known asserters in the chain, repeat correspondent fingerprints, pre-litigation assignments, and bankruptcy fire-sales.

Log in to generate
Not generated yet. Log in to request this analysis.

Prior art

Earlier patents, publications, and products that may anticipate or render the claims unpatentable.

Log in to generate
Not generated yet. Log in to request this analysis.

Obviousness

Combinations of prior art that suggest the claimed invention would have been obvious under 35 U.S.C. § 103.

Log in to generate
Not generated yet. Log in to request this analysis.

Extensions

Patent term adjustments, term extensions, continuations, divisionals, family members, and expiration dates.

Log in to generate
Not generated yet. Log in to request this analysis.

Derivative works

Defensive disclosure: derivative variations of each claim designed to render future incremental improvements obvious or non-novel.

Log in to generate
Not generated yet. Log in to request this analysis.