Invalidity dossier

US 5949997

Method and apparatus for programming a microprocessor using an address decode circuit

Current assignee: Teradata US Inc

Added 9/17/2026, 11:28:31 AM

At a glanceNo PTAB challengesNo litigation on file

Active provider: DeepSeek · deepseek-flash

Patent summary

Title, assignee, inventors, filing/issue dates, abstract, and a plain-language overview of the claims.

✓ Generated

Patent Overview: US 5,949,997 A

Title: Method and apparatus for programming a microprocessor using an address decode circuit

Patent number: US 5,949,997 A (application US08/778,519)

Original assignee: NCR Corporation; current assignee listed as Teradata US Inc (listed assignees may be inaccurate; no legal analysis performed)

Key dates: Priority/filing date 1997-01-03; granted/publication date 1999-09-07; anticipated expiration 2017-01-03; status "Expired – Lifetime"

Inventor: Gregory James Smith

Source: https://patents.google.com/patent/US5949997/en

Purpose: To allow a microprocessor used as an embedded controller in high-reliability systems to have its programming updated in the field (flash programming) "in a fail-safe manner"—without adversely affecting the controlled system, and with the ability to return to a known state if the updated program fails.

Plain-language scope: The invention uses first and second memory banks (flash bank A, bank B), a reset circuit, and an address decode circuit. The first bank holds a current program; the second holds an updated program. The microprocessor boots from the current program, then reboots from the updated program. During that reboot it runs diagnostics (e.g., checksum, functional testing). A timer in the reset circuit runs from de-assertion of RESET; a CONFIRM signal from the microprocessor must arrive before timeout, or RESET is re-asserted. If the updated program is good, its bank becomes the default for future boots; if not, the microprocessor reboots using the current program and a FAIL signal is generated. Bank selection is determined by data in non-volatile memory within the reset circuit, which distinguishes a hardware/power-on reset from a SWITCH signal asserted by the microprocessor (default vs. non-default bank). The reset circuit can hold the rest of the system in reset via a SYSTEM RESET signal. In one embodiment the microprocessor is a Neuron™ microprocessor.

What the excerpt does not establish: It is a partial excerpt (text truncated at Block 56 onward), so the full specification, all claims, the complete FIG. 2/FIG. 3 state diagrams, and any claim language are not reproduced. It also does not establish claim scope, validity, enforceability, or prior art, and lists no cited references.

Generated 10/1/2026, 10:03:14 PM

Cases on file (0)

Specific litigation cases in our database that name US patent 5949997. The free-form analysis below may also discuss cases beyond this list.

No cases on file mention this patent. Upload a CSV or add a case manually in Admin → Manage litigation cases.

Litigation summary

Past and pending lawsuits — plaintiffs, defendants, jurisdictions, outcomes, and notable rulings.

Log in to generate
Not generated yet. Log in to request this analysis.

Proceedings on file (0)

All PTAB activity →

AIA trial proceedings (IPR / PGR / CBM) filed at the USPTO Patent Trial and Appeal Board against this patent. Sourced from the USPTO Open Data Portal and refreshed every six hours; each proceeding number deep-links to the PTAB E2E docket.

No PTAB proceedings on file. This patent has not been challenged via IPR, PGR, or CBM. The absence is itself a signal — well-asserted patents eventually attract IPRs. The LLM analysis below may surface filings the ODP feed hasn’t indexed yet.

PTAB challenges

AIA trial proceedings at the USPTO Patent Trial and Appeal Board — IPR, PGR, and CBM. Petitioners, judge panels, claim-level invalidation outcomes from Final Written Decisions, and Federal Circuit appeals. The single most important defensive datapoint after litigation history.

Log in to generate
Not generated yet. Log in to request this analysis.

Assignment history

Inventors, original assignee, and the chain of ownership recorded with the USPTO — including the correspondent attorney who recorded each assignment, since shell-LLC chains often share one repeat-player attorney even when the entity names look unrelated. Surfaces NPE / patent-troll patterns: shell-entity transfers, known asserters in the chain, repeat correspondent fingerprints, pre-litigation assignments, and bankruptcy fire-sales.

Log in to generate
Not generated yet. Log in to request this analysis.

Prior art

Earlier patents, publications, and products that may anticipate or render the claims unpatentable.

Log in to generate
Not generated yet. Log in to request this analysis.

Obviousness

Combinations of prior art that suggest the claimed invention would have been obvious under 35 U.S.C. § 103.

Log in to generate
Not generated yet. Log in to request this analysis.

Extensions

Patent term adjustments, term extensions, continuations, divisionals, family members, and expiration dates.

Log in to generate
Not generated yet. Log in to request this analysis.

Derivative works

Defensive disclosure: derivative variations of each claim designed to render future incremental improvements obvious or non-novel.

Log in to generate
Not generated yet. Log in to request this analysis.