Invalidity dossier
US 5920108
Late process method and apparatus for trench isolation
Current assignee: Intersil Corp
Added 9/23/2026, 3:15:33 PM
Active provider: DeepSeek · deepseek-flash
Patent summary
Title, assignee, inventors, filing/issue dates, abstract, and a plain-language overview of the claims.
Patent Overview — US 5,920,108 A
Title: Late process method and apparatus for trench isolation
Patent number / application: US 5,920,108 A; Application US 08/745,104.
Inventors: Donald Frank Hemmenway and Lawrence George Pearce.
Assignee information (as listed): Original assignee Harris Corp; current assignee listed as Intersil Corp.
Dates (as listed): Prior art date 1995-06-05; filing date 1996-11-07; publication/grant date 1999-07-06; anticipated expiration 2015-06-05. Legal status listed as "Expired - Lifetime." (The source states legal status is an assumption, not a legal conclusion.)
Purpose. The invention "relates in general to a method and apparatus for trench isolation and, in particular, for providing trench isolation after completion of a final thick thermal oxidation step and a final deep diffusion step."
Plain-language scope. The patent addresses isolating conductive regions or layers in an integrated circuit. Isolation may be by junction isolation (juxtaposing differently doped regions) or dielectrically, using a dielectric region, layer, or structure between selected conductive regions and between selected transistors or other devices. In some devices the whole integrated circuit is insulated from bulk substrate material by a buried dielectric layer — silicon-on-insulator (SOI) devices. Certain SOI devices may be formed using a bonded wafer technique, in which a device wafer is bonded to a silicon dioxide surface layer of a handle wafer, giving a buried dielectric layer beneath the device wafer. One technique provides trenches around devices: trenches are patterned in the semiconductor substrate surface where devices are formed or are to be formed. Per the excerpt, prior-art trench isolation processes are performed early in integrated-circuit fabrication, before the major diffusions that form transistors and other devices and before completion of thick thermal oxide growth. The excerpt notes trench filling with dielectric material and polysilicon, oxide fill by thermal oxidation of the substrate forming the trench walls and floor, and oxide fill during local thermal oxidation. It also notes that most devices include a thermal oxidation step growing oxide thicker than 500 Angstroms, and that such thermal oxide is generally performed after substantial diffusions form larger device regions (e.g., collector regions in bipolar devices or well regions in MOS devices).
Source: https://patents.google.com/patent/US5920108/en
What the excerpt does not establish. The supplied text is marked as excerpted and omits material. It provides no claim language, so the actual claimed scope cannot be determined. It does not describe the specific "late process" sequence, apparatus structure, embodiments, or figures. It establishes nothing about prior art beyond general background statements, and nothing about validity, enforceability, litigation, or ownership transfers beyond the assignment entries listed.
Generated 10/1/2026, 9:51:43 PM
Cases on file (0)
Specific litigation cases in our database that name US patent 5920108. The free-form analysis below may also discuss cases beyond this list.
No cases on file mention this patent. Upload a CSV or add a case manually in Admin → Manage litigation cases.
Litigation summary
Past and pending lawsuits — plaintiffs, defendants, jurisdictions, outcomes, and notable rulings.
Proceedings on file (0)
All PTAB activity →AIA trial proceedings (IPR / PGR / CBM) filed at the USPTO Patent Trial and Appeal Board against this patent. Sourced from the USPTO Open Data Portal and refreshed every six hours; each proceeding number deep-links to the PTAB E2E docket.
No PTAB proceedings on file. This patent has not been challenged via IPR, PGR, or CBM. The absence is itself a signal — well-asserted patents eventually attract IPRs. The LLM analysis below may surface filings the ODP feed hasn’t indexed yet.
PTAB challenges
AIA trial proceedings at the USPTO Patent Trial and Appeal Board — IPR, PGR, and CBM. Petitioners, judge panels, claim-level invalidation outcomes from Final Written Decisions, and Federal Circuit appeals. The single most important defensive datapoint after litigation history.
Assignment history
Inventors, original assignee, and the chain of ownership recorded with the USPTO — including the correspondent attorney who recorded each assignment, since shell-LLC chains often share one repeat-player attorney even when the entity names look unrelated. Surfaces NPE / patent-troll patterns: shell-entity transfers, known asserters in the chain, repeat correspondent fingerprints, pre-litigation assignments, and bankruptcy fire-sales.
Prior art
Earlier patents, publications, and products that may anticipate or render the claims unpatentable.
Obviousness
Combinations of prior art that suggest the claimed invention would have been obvious under 35 U.S.C. § 103.
Extensions
Patent term adjustments, term extensions, continuations, divisionals, family members, and expiration dates.
Derivative works
Defensive disclosure: derivative variations of each claim designed to render future incremental improvements obvious or non-novel.