Invalidity dossier

US 5832503

Method and apparatus for configuration management in communications networks

Current assignee: CA Inc

Added 9/23/2026, 7:35:42 PM

At a glanceNo PTAB challengesNo litigation on file

Active provider: DeepSeek · deepseek-flash

Patent summary

Title, assignee, inventors, filing/issue dates, abstract, and a plain-language overview of the claims.

✓ Generated

Patent Overview — US 5,832,503 A

Title: Method and apparatus for configuration management in communications networks

Patent number: US 5,832,503 A (application US08/394,143)

Original assignee: Cabletron Systems Inc. (the excerpt also lists current assignees CA Inc and Concord Communications LLC)

Inventor(s): Rajiv Malik, Steve Sycamore, Bill Tracy

Key dates: Priority/filing date 1995‑02‑24; granted/publication date 1998‑11‑03; legal status "Expired – Lifetime." The excerpt lists a 2015‑11‑03 "anticipated expiration" entry.

Purpose: The invention addresses configuration management in communications networks — keeping an inventory of network devices, knowing each device's configuration, resetting or updating configurations, and scheduling changes. Prior approaches were manual (attaching a dumb terminal and issuing commands, with no way to retrieve or store configuration information) or device‑specific software limited to one device type, so different device types could not be configured simultaneously.

Plain‑language scope (from the excerpt): The invention is a method and apparatus using a database of "models," each model representing an associated network device with attribute values. A configuration manager accesses "model types," each having an associated set of attributes, and creates a "template" by selecting a model type and attributes. Screening a selected model with the template retrieves attribute values to create a "configuration record," which may be stored, modified, transferred to a model, and/or displayed. Multiple templates can create composite configuration records, and multiple configuration records can be transferred to multiple models to reconfigure multiple network devices. A template may also be derived from a pre‑existing configuration record. Other features mentioned include alarms indicating transfer/reconfiguration success and a scheduler for automatic capture, load, or verification of configuration records.

Source: https://patents.google.com/patent/US5832503/en

What the excerpt does not establish: It does not supply the full claims, detailed description, drawings, or complete prosecution history. Because the text is excerpted, it does not establish the precise claim scope, the full list of limitations, the content of any specific claim, the exact legal status, or the accuracy of the listed assignees; nor does it detail the referenced SPECTRUM system or cited commercial tools. No conclusions about validity, infringement, or prior art are supported by this excerpt.

Generated 10/1/2026, 9:41:55 PM

Cases on file (0)

Specific litigation cases in our database that name US patent 5832503. The free-form analysis below may also discuss cases beyond this list.

No cases on file mention this patent. Upload a CSV or add a case manually in Admin → Manage litigation cases.

Litigation summary

Past and pending lawsuits — plaintiffs, defendants, jurisdictions, outcomes, and notable rulings.

Log in to generate
Not generated yet. Log in to request this analysis.

Proceedings on file (0)

All PTAB activity →

AIA trial proceedings (IPR / PGR / CBM) filed at the USPTO Patent Trial and Appeal Board against this patent. Sourced from the USPTO Open Data Portal and refreshed every six hours; each proceeding number deep-links to the PTAB E2E docket.

No PTAB proceedings on file. This patent has not been challenged via IPR, PGR, or CBM. The absence is itself a signal — well-asserted patents eventually attract IPRs. The LLM analysis below may surface filings the ODP feed hasn’t indexed yet.

PTAB challenges

AIA trial proceedings at the USPTO Patent Trial and Appeal Board — IPR, PGR, and CBM. Petitioners, judge panels, claim-level invalidation outcomes from Final Written Decisions, and Federal Circuit appeals. The single most important defensive datapoint after litigation history.

Log in to generate
Not generated yet. Log in to request this analysis.

Assignment history

Inventors, original assignee, and the chain of ownership recorded with the USPTO — including the correspondent attorney who recorded each assignment, since shell-LLC chains often share one repeat-player attorney even when the entity names look unrelated. Surfaces NPE / patent-troll patterns: shell-entity transfers, known asserters in the chain, repeat correspondent fingerprints, pre-litigation assignments, and bankruptcy fire-sales.

Log in to generate
Not generated yet. Log in to request this analysis.

Prior art

Earlier patents, publications, and products that may anticipate or render the claims unpatentable.

Log in to generate
Not generated yet. Log in to request this analysis.

Obviousness

Combinations of prior art that suggest the claimed invention would have been obvious under 35 U.S.C. § 103.

Log in to generate
Not generated yet. Log in to request this analysis.

Extensions

Patent term adjustments, term extensions, continuations, divisionals, family members, and expiration dates.

Log in to generate
Not generated yet. Log in to request this analysis.

Derivative works

Defensive disclosure: derivative variations of each claim designed to render future incremental improvements obvious or non-novel.

Log in to generate
Not generated yet. Log in to request this analysis.