Invalidity dossier

US 5781889

Computer jukebox and jukebox network

Current assignee: Martin Automatic Inc

Added 8/27/2026, 3:02:16 AM

At a glanceNo PTAB challengesNo litigation on fileAudio Technology

Active provider: DeepSeek · deepseek-v4-flash

Auto-generating section 1 of 7: Litigation summary

Each section takes ~30-60s with web-search grounding. Keep this tab open — sections will fill in below as they complete.

Patent summary

Title, assignee, inventors, filing/issue dates, abstract, and a plain-language overview of the claims.

✓ Generated

Summary — US Patent 5,781,889 ("US5781889A")

Bibliographic data (from Google Patents record, fetched 2026-08-27)

Field Value
Title Computer jukebox and jukebox network
Patent / Publication No. US 5,781,889 A (US5781889A)
Application No. US08/584,253 (filed 1996-01-11)
Issue date 1998-07-14
Priority date 1990-06-15
Inventors John R. Martin; Michael L. Tillery; Samuel N. Zammuto
Assignee (original) Individual (per Google Patents)
Assignee (current listing) Martin Automatic Inc. — Google Patents adds a caveat that its assignee listing "may be inaccurate." Assignment records show Arachnid, Inc. as assignor: a 1999-08-11 security-interest recordation and a 2000-07-26 assignment of assignor's interest to Martin Automatic, Inc.
Status Expired – Lifetime (anticipated expiration 2010-06-15)
Priority chain Continuation of abandoned Ser. No. 268,782 (filed 1994-06-30) → division of Ser. No. 846,707 (filed 1992-03-06, now US 5,355,302) → continuation-in-part of abandoned Ser. No. 538,981 (filed 1990-06-15)
Related family members US 5,848,398 (CIP), US 5,930,765, US 6,397,189 (continuation), US 6,381,575, US 2001/0023403A1, among others

Abstract (verbatim from record)

"A central management system manages a plurality of computer jukeboxes and communicates compressed digital data with each jukebox via a transmission link. The management system also includes a host computer that maintains a master set of compressed digital data representing a plurality of songs, song associated graphics, and song identity information. Each jukebox includes a storage unit that is capable of storing a subset of the master set and a processing circuit having a decompression circuit. The processing circuit controls the operation and flow of digital data into and out of the jukebox through the transmission link as well as a visual song information display, user song selection keys, a money detector, and an audio reproduction circuit coupled to a speaker system so as to provide audio output to users of the jukebox."

Independent claims — plain-language overview

The patent has 13 claims. There are two independent claims (claims 1 and 7); claims 2–6 depend from claim 1, and claims 8–13 depend from claim 7.

Claim 1 (standalone computer jukebox): A jukebox that stores songs as compressed digital data and can be updated over a communication link. It comprises:

  • a communication interface for receiving compressed song data plus song-identity data;
  • computer memory storing the received song data and identity data;
  • a display showing prospective users which songs are stored (based on the identity data);
  • a user-selection mechanism generating a signal for the chosen song;
  • at least one speaker;
  • a decompression means and a digital-to-analog converter between the decompressor and the speaker;
  • a processor that, on selection, retrieves the corresponding compressed song data from memory, decompresses it, and converts it to an analog signal for playback; the same processor also responds to newly received compressed song/identity data by storing it in memory, thereby updating the song library.

Claim 7 (jukebox network): A network of multiple such computer jukeboxes (each having the components described in claim 1) plus a management station that updates each jukebox's library. The management station includes:

  • a communication interface for transmitting/receiving compressed song data, song-identity data, and other compressed digital data;
  • processing/control means for storing a master set of songs and identity data in a storage unit, compressing song data, and transmitting a subset of the compressed songs and their identity data to a jukebox to update its library;
  • the station is "operative for selectively transmitting the song digital data and song identity data to different ones of the plurality of computer jukeboxes" — i.e., it can tailor updates to each jukebox individually.

Notable dependent-claim features: claim 2 adds song-usage (play-count) data transmission; claims 3–4 add compressed graphics data and an "attract mode" that displays song-associated graphics when no song is playing; claim 5 covers modem/RF/direct-communication-port interfaces; claim 6 adds a coin/bill detector and money-intake tracking. Claims 8–13 mirror these features for the network (remote vs. portable management station, usage-data collection for deciding song replacements, and money-intake reporting).

Litigation / CAFC 2026 docket search

  • CAFC 2026 dockets: My searches for a CAFC 2026 appeal involving "5781889" returned no results. I have no authoritative evidence of any 2026 Federal Circuit proceeding for this specific patent number. Given the patent's status (expired 2010-06-15), a live 2026 appeal would be unusual; treat the absence of a docket as unconfirmed rather than definitive.
  • Historical litigation: Google Patents flags the family as "has litigation," linking to a California Northern District Court case (3:09-cv-03001, per Unified Patents/Darts-ip litigation data), details of which I could not verify in this search. Separately, family-adjacent patents (e.g., US 6,397,189 and US 6,381,575 — note these are different patent numbers) were litigated in TouchTunes Music Corp. v. Rowe Int'l Corp., Arachnid, Inc., et al., No. 07 Civ. 11450 (S.D.N.Y.), where Arachnid's infringement counterclaims failed. I could not confirm in this search whether US 5,781,889 itself was asserted in that or any Federal Circuit appeal; do not conflate it with the " '189 patent" references in that case, which denote US 6,397,189.

Uncertainty notes

  • The assignee history is somewhat murky in the record: "Original Assignee: Individual," current Google listing "Martin Automatic Inc.," with Arachnid, Inc. appearing in the assignment chain — I would verify against USPTO Assignment records before relying on it.
  • No authoritative CAFC 2026 docket was located; that portion is unconfirmed.

Generated 8/27/2026, 3:02:51 AM

Cases on file (0)

Specific litigation cases in our database that name US patent 5781889. The free-form analysis below may also discuss cases beyond this list.

No cases on file mention this patent. Upload a CSV or add a case manually in Admin → Manage litigation cases.

Litigation summary

Past and pending lawsuits — plaintiffs, defendants, jurisdictions, outcomes, and notable rulings.

Not generated yet. Click Generate to call the active LLM provider with the configured prompt.

Proceedings on file (0)

All PTAB activity →

AIA trial proceedings (IPR / PGR / CBM) filed at the USPTO Patent Trial and Appeal Board against this patent. Sourced from the USPTO Open Data Portal and refreshed every six hours; each proceeding number deep-links to the PTAB E2E docket.

No PTAB proceedings on file. This patent has not been challenged via IPR, PGR, or CBM. The absence is itself a signal — well-asserted patents eventually attract IPRs. The LLM analysis below may surface filings the ODP feed hasn’t indexed yet.

PTAB challenges

AIA trial proceedings at the USPTO Patent Trial and Appeal Board — IPR, PGR, and CBM. Petitioners, judge panels, claim-level invalidation outcomes from Final Written Decisions, and Federal Circuit appeals. The single most important defensive datapoint after litigation history.

Not generated yet. Click Generate to call the active LLM provider with the configured prompt.

Assignment history

Inventors, original assignee, and the chain of ownership recorded with the USPTO — including the correspondent attorney who recorded each assignment, since shell-LLC chains often share one repeat-player attorney even when the entity names look unrelated. Surfaces NPE / patent-troll patterns: shell-entity transfers, known asserters in the chain, repeat correspondent fingerprints, pre-litigation assignments, and bankruptcy fire-sales.

Not generated yet. Click Generate to call the active LLM provider with the configured prompt.

Prior art

Earlier patents, publications, and products that may anticipate or render the claims unpatentable.

Not generated yet. Click Generate to call the active LLM provider with the configured prompt.

Obviousness

Combinations of prior art that suggest the claimed invention would have been obvious under 35 U.S.C. § 103.

Not generated yet. Click Generate to call the active LLM provider with the configured prompt.

Extensions

Patent term adjustments, term extensions, continuations, divisionals, family members, and expiration dates.

Not generated yet. Click Generate to call the active LLM provider with the configured prompt.

Derivative works

Defensive disclosure: derivative variations of each claim designed to render future incremental improvements obvious or non-novel.

Not generated yet. Click Generate to call the active LLM provider with the configured prompt.

Keep exploring

Other patents in Audio Technology

See all Audio Technology patents →