Invalidity dossier

US 5666142

Ink jet recording system having improved functional devices for driving energy generating members

Current assignee: Canon Inc

Added 9/23/2026, 8:57:58 PM

At a glanceNo PTAB challengesNo litigation on file

Active provider: DeepSeek · deepseek-flash

Patent summary

Title, assignee, inventors, filing/issue dates, abstract, and a plain-language overview of the claims.

✓ Generated

Patent Overview — US 5,666,142 A

Title: "Ink jet recording system having improved functional devices for driving energy generating members"

Patent number: US 5,666,142 A
Application number: US 08/255,899
Assignee: Canon Inc. (original assignee; listed current assignee)
Inventors: Kei Fujita, Asao Saito, Shigeyuki Matsumoto
Filing date: 1994-06-07
Publication (grant) date: 1997-09-09
Priority date (as listed): 1990-01-31
Legal status (as listed): Expired – Lifetime; anticipated expiration 2014-09-09
Source: https://patents.google.com/patent/US5666142/en

Purpose and plain-language scope (from the supplied excerpt):
The patent concerns an ink jet recording system in which improved "functional devices" drive energy-generating members. In simpler terms, it relates to the electrical/structural elements that power the components that eject ink, and to how those elements are arranged and formed in the print head. The excerpt associates the disclosure with bubble jet print heads, including "edge shooter" types, and with nozzle production techniques such as bonding, dry and wet etching, photolithography, molding, thin-film formation, and CVD. Prior-art keyword listings point to an "ink region," "impurity concentration," a "substrate plate," and the "functional devices" themselves, suggesting the technology addresses ink channel regions, substrate structure, and impurity (doping) levels in the drive circuitry. The classification applied is B41J2/16 (production of nozzles), including subclasses for bubble jet print heads, edge shooter print heads, and their manufacture.

What the supplied excerpt does not establish:
The excerpt contains only bibliographic data, classification codes, images placeholders, and prior-art keywords. It does not include the claims, the written description, an abstract, or the drawing descriptions. Therefore the excerpt does not establish the specific claimed structure, the precise relationship between impurity concentration and device function, any measured performance benefit, the embodiments described, or any comparison to prior art. Nothing here establishes litigation, ownership transfers, validity, or enforceability, and no such findings are offered.

Generated 10/1/2026, 9:41:02 PM

Cases on file (0)

Specific litigation cases in our database that name US patent 5666142. The free-form analysis below may also discuss cases beyond this list.

No cases on file mention this patent. Upload a CSV or add a case manually in Admin → Manage litigation cases.

Litigation summary

Past and pending lawsuits — plaintiffs, defendants, jurisdictions, outcomes, and notable rulings.

Log in to generate
Not generated yet. Log in to request this analysis.

Proceedings on file (0)

All PTAB activity →

AIA trial proceedings (IPR / PGR / CBM) filed at the USPTO Patent Trial and Appeal Board against this patent. Sourced from the USPTO Open Data Portal and refreshed every six hours; each proceeding number deep-links to the PTAB E2E docket.

No PTAB proceedings on file. This patent has not been challenged via IPR, PGR, or CBM. The absence is itself a signal — well-asserted patents eventually attract IPRs. The LLM analysis below may surface filings the ODP feed hasn’t indexed yet.

PTAB challenges

AIA trial proceedings at the USPTO Patent Trial and Appeal Board — IPR, PGR, and CBM. Petitioners, judge panels, claim-level invalidation outcomes from Final Written Decisions, and Federal Circuit appeals. The single most important defensive datapoint after litigation history.

Log in to generate
Not generated yet. Log in to request this analysis.

Assignment history

Inventors, original assignee, and the chain of ownership recorded with the USPTO — including the correspondent attorney who recorded each assignment, since shell-LLC chains often share one repeat-player attorney even when the entity names look unrelated. Surfaces NPE / patent-troll patterns: shell-entity transfers, known asserters in the chain, repeat correspondent fingerprints, pre-litigation assignments, and bankruptcy fire-sales.

Log in to generate
Not generated yet. Log in to request this analysis.

Prior art

Earlier patents, publications, and products that may anticipate or render the claims unpatentable.

Log in to generate
Not generated yet. Log in to request this analysis.

Obviousness

Combinations of prior art that suggest the claimed invention would have been obvious under 35 U.S.C. § 103.

Log in to generate
Not generated yet. Log in to request this analysis.

Extensions

Patent term adjustments, term extensions, continuations, divisionals, family members, and expiration dates.

Log in to generate
Not generated yet. Log in to request this analysis.

Derivative works

Defensive disclosure: derivative variations of each claim designed to render future incremental improvements obvious or non-novel.

Log in to generate
Not generated yet. Log in to request this analysis.