Invalidity dossier

US 5598281

Backlight assembly for improved illumination employing tapered optical elements

Current assignee: Honeywell International Inc

Added 9/23/2026, 10:21:00 PM

At a glanceNo PTAB challengesNo litigation on file

Active provider: DeepSeek · deepseek-flash

Patent summary

Title, assignee, inventors, filing/issue dates, abstract, and a plain-language overview of the claims.

✓ Generated

Patent Overview — US5598281A

Title: Backlight assembly for improved illumination employing tapered optical elements

Patent number: US5598281A
Application number: US08/203,232
Inventors: Scott M. Zimmerman; Karl W. Beeson; Paul M. Ferm
Original assignee: AlliedSignal Inc. (current assignee listed as Honeywell International Inc.)
Priority/filing date: 1993-11-19
Publication (grant) date: 1997-01-28
Legal status: Expired – Lifetime (anticipated expiration 2014-01-28)

Purpose. The patent addresses direct-view electro-optical displays, such as liquid crystal displays (LCDs), and more particularly backlit displays for military and avionics applications. The stated aim is to provide an efficient, bright, uniform image with high contrast, viewable over a wide viewing angle, in a low-profile assembly. The text notes that transmissive LCDs require a backlight, that LCDs suffer low contrast and chromaticity shifts at large viewing angles, and that the backlighting scheme is important to both image quality and display profile. The patent characterizes itself as directed to flat panel displays having an improved backlit electronic display.

Plain-language scope. According to the title, the assembly is a backlight for improved illumination that employs tapered optical elements to distribute light from a source across the display. The supplied text also references prior arrangements via EPO 0 525 55 A1; U.S. Pat. Nos. 4,659,185, 5,132,830, 5,159,478, 5,128,783 and 5,161,041; and Japanese Publication Nos. 245106 and 42241, and notes that the present invention is distinguished from such past backlighting configurations. The excerpt lists prior-art keywords "light," "array," "collimating," "backlight assembly," and "input surface," which suggest a collimating, array-based light-input arrangement, but the excerpt does not describe the claimed structure.

What the excerpt does not establish. It does not supply the claims, detailed description, drawing descriptions, or any express claim language; no specific tapered-element geometry, dimensions, materials, or optical performance figures are given. It also does not verify inventorship, ownership, or legal status beyond the stated assumptions.

Source: https://patents.google.com/patent/[US5598281](/patent/US5598281)/en

Generated 10/1/2026, 9:33:31 PM

Cases on file (0)

Specific litigation cases in our database that name US patent 5598281. The free-form analysis below may also discuss cases beyond this list.

No cases on file mention this patent. Upload a CSV or add a case manually in Admin → Manage litigation cases.

Litigation summary

Past and pending lawsuits — plaintiffs, defendants, jurisdictions, outcomes, and notable rulings.

Log in to generate
Not generated yet. Log in to request this analysis.

Proceedings on file (0)

All PTAB activity →

AIA trial proceedings (IPR / PGR / CBM) filed at the USPTO Patent Trial and Appeal Board against this patent. Sourced from the USPTO Open Data Portal and refreshed every six hours; each proceeding number deep-links to the PTAB E2E docket.

No PTAB proceedings on file. This patent has not been challenged via IPR, PGR, or CBM. The absence is itself a signal — well-asserted patents eventually attract IPRs. The LLM analysis below may surface filings the ODP feed hasn’t indexed yet.

PTAB challenges

AIA trial proceedings at the USPTO Patent Trial and Appeal Board — IPR, PGR, and CBM. Petitioners, judge panels, claim-level invalidation outcomes from Final Written Decisions, and Federal Circuit appeals. The single most important defensive datapoint after litigation history.

Log in to generate
Not generated yet. Log in to request this analysis.

Assignment history

Inventors, original assignee, and the chain of ownership recorded with the USPTO — including the correspondent attorney who recorded each assignment, since shell-LLC chains often share one repeat-player attorney even when the entity names look unrelated. Surfaces NPE / patent-troll patterns: shell-entity transfers, known asserters in the chain, repeat correspondent fingerprints, pre-litigation assignments, and bankruptcy fire-sales.

Log in to generate
Not generated yet. Log in to request this analysis.

Prior art

Earlier patents, publications, and products that may anticipate or render the claims unpatentable.

Log in to generate
Not generated yet. Log in to request this analysis.

Obviousness

Combinations of prior art that suggest the claimed invention would have been obvious under 35 U.S.C. § 103.

Log in to generate
Not generated yet. Log in to request this analysis.

Extensions

Patent term adjustments, term extensions, continuations, divisionals, family members, and expiration dates.

Log in to generate
Not generated yet. Log in to request this analysis.

Derivative works

Defensive disclosure: derivative variations of each claim designed to render future incremental improvements obvious or non-novel.

Log in to generate
Not generated yet. Log in to request this analysis.