Invalidity dossier

US 5510841

Encoding apparatus in which flat subblocks are identified in blocks of a motion signal prior to coding the blocks and complementary decoding apparatus

Current assignee: Sony Corp

Added 9/23/2026, 1:27:02 PM

At a glanceNo PTAB challengesNo litigation on file

Active provider: DeepSeek · deepseek-flash

Patent summary

Title, assignee, inventors, filing/issue dates, abstract, and a plain-language overview of the claims.

✓ Generated

Patent Overview — US5510841A

Title: Encoding apparatus in which flat subblocks are identified in blocks of a motion signal prior to coding the blocks and complementary decoding apparatus

Patent number: US5510841A | Application number: US08/286,562

Inventor: Ryuichi Iwamura

Assignee: Sony Corp (current and original assignee, per the listing)

Key dates:

  • Prior art date / priority date: 1991-09-20
  • Filing date: 1994-08-05
  • Publication (grant) date: 1996-04-23
  • Anticipated expiration: 2013-04-23
  • Legal status as listed: Expired – Lifetime (the source notes legal status is an assumption, not a legal conclusion)
  • Related: priority to US08/456,963 on 1995-06-01, which led to patent US6064435A

Purpose (plain-language, per title and classification): The invention concerns encoding digital video signals. Within blocks of a motion signal, subblocks that are "flat" are identified before the blocks are coded. The complementary decoding apparatus reverses this process. The title implies a motion-signal context, i.e., this relates to motion estimation/motion compensation in video coding rather than only intra-picture transforms.

Scope as indicated by classifications: The patent is classified under H04N19/00 (video coding/decoding), including predictive coding (H04N19/50), motion estimation/motion compensation (H04N19/51, /503, /513, /517), adaptive coding (H04N19/10), sampling/masking/truncation of coding units (H04N19/132), coding-unit complexity and edge/activity estimation (H04N19/14), and block/macroblock coding units (H04N19/176). These classes indicate a video encoder in which block-level activity or "flatness" drives adaptivity prior to coding.

Source: https://patents.google.com/patent/[US5510841](/patent/US5510841)/en

What the excerpt does not establish: The supplied text is largely bibliographic and classification data with schematic images omitted. It does not include the claims, detailed description, specific flatness criteria or thresholds, block/subblock sizes, coding syntax, or the precise structure of the encoder and decoder. No prior-art references are furnished in the excerpt. No litigation, ownership transfer, validity, or prior-art analysis is offered here, and none should be inferred beyond the listed bibliographic fields.

Generated 10/1/2026, 9:53:07 PM

Cases on file (0)

Specific litigation cases in our database that name US patent 5510841. The free-form analysis below may also discuss cases beyond this list.

No cases on file mention this patent. Upload a CSV or add a case manually in Admin → Manage litigation cases.

Litigation summary

Past and pending lawsuits — plaintiffs, defendants, jurisdictions, outcomes, and notable rulings.

Log in to generate
Not generated yet. Log in to request this analysis.

Proceedings on file (0)

All PTAB activity →

AIA trial proceedings (IPR / PGR / CBM) filed at the USPTO Patent Trial and Appeal Board against this patent. Sourced from the USPTO Open Data Portal and refreshed every six hours; each proceeding number deep-links to the PTAB E2E docket.

No PTAB proceedings on file. This patent has not been challenged via IPR, PGR, or CBM. The absence is itself a signal — well-asserted patents eventually attract IPRs. The LLM analysis below may surface filings the ODP feed hasn’t indexed yet.

PTAB challenges

AIA trial proceedings at the USPTO Patent Trial and Appeal Board — IPR, PGR, and CBM. Petitioners, judge panels, claim-level invalidation outcomes from Final Written Decisions, and Federal Circuit appeals. The single most important defensive datapoint after litigation history.

Log in to generate
Not generated yet. Log in to request this analysis.

Assignment history

Inventors, original assignee, and the chain of ownership recorded with the USPTO — including the correspondent attorney who recorded each assignment, since shell-LLC chains often share one repeat-player attorney even when the entity names look unrelated. Surfaces NPE / patent-troll patterns: shell-entity transfers, known asserters in the chain, repeat correspondent fingerprints, pre-litigation assignments, and bankruptcy fire-sales.

Log in to generate
Not generated yet. Log in to request this analysis.

Prior art

Earlier patents, publications, and products that may anticipate or render the claims unpatentable.

Log in to generate
Not generated yet. Log in to request this analysis.

Obviousness

Combinations of prior art that suggest the claimed invention would have been obvious under 35 U.S.C. § 103.

Log in to generate
Not generated yet. Log in to request this analysis.

Extensions

Patent term adjustments, term extensions, continuations, divisionals, family members, and expiration dates.

Log in to generate
Not generated yet. Log in to request this analysis.

Derivative works

Defensive disclosure: derivative variations of each claim designed to render future incremental improvements obvious or non-novel.

Log in to generate
Not generated yet. Log in to request this analysis.