Invalidity dossier

US 5483524

Method for transmitting data packets via a circuit-switched channel

Current assignee: Motorola Solutions Inc

Added 9/23/2026, 6:53:20 PM

At a glanceNo PTAB challengesNo litigation on file

Active provider: DeepSeek · deepseek-flash

Patent summary

Title, assignee, inventors, filing/issue dates, abstract, and a plain-language overview of the claims.

✓ Generated

Patent Overview: US 5,483,524

Title: Method for transmitting data packets via a circuit-switched channel

Patent number / application: US 5,483,524 A; Application US08/239,489

Inventors: Valy Lev, Rod Averbuch, Israel A. Cimet

Original assignee: Motorola, Inc. (current assignee listed as [Motorola Solutions Inc.](/litigations/by-defendant/Motorola%20Solutions%20Inc.))

Filing / priority date: 1994-05-09

Publication (grant) date: 1996-01-09

Status: Expired – Fee Related; anticipated expiration 2014-05-09

Classifications: H04L12/64 (hybrid switching), H04L12/6418 (hybrid transport), H04W76/10 (connection setup), H04W8/26 (addressing for mobility)

Purpose. The text describes a need to send packet-switched data efficiently over circuit-switched, particularly wireless, channels. It notes the bandwidth disparity between LAN/WANs and wireless systems (sometimes 10×), different resulting protocols, and drawbacks of both pure circuit-switched transmission (channel inactivity between bursts of data) and packet-switched transmission (overhead, scheduling delay), as well as the inefficiency of establishing a circuit-switched connection per packet or packet group.

Plain-language scope. Data to be sent is formatted into data packets, each carrying a first target destination identifier (e.g., an IP address). From that identifier a second target destination identifier is determined. A circuit-switched channel is set up to the target destination using the second identifier, and the packets are transmitted over that channel without transmitting either identifier with them. Packets may be grouped into a session whose header and conclusion indicator control channel set-up and tear-down. A network interfacer (e.g., a gateway) links a LAN/WAN (ISDN, Frame Relay, ATM) to an RF system having a controller with a database, base stations, and a target destination such as a GSM unit or MIRS dispatch radio with a data terminal. The text mentions TCP/IP in simplex operation and AppleTalk Transaction protocol in duplex as examples.

Source: https://patents.google.com/patent/US5483524/en

What the excerpt does not establish: It is excerpted (description text is truncated mid-sentence), so the full logic of FIGS. 4–5 and the complete claims are not shown. It establishes no litigation, ownership-transfer, validity, or prior-art conclusions; legal status entries are described in the source itself as assumptions, not legal conclusions.

Generated 10/1/2026, 9:42:28 PM

Cases on file (0)

Specific litigation cases in our database that name US patent 5483524. The free-form analysis below may also discuss cases beyond this list.

No cases on file mention this patent. Upload a CSV or add a case manually in Admin → Manage litigation cases.

Litigation summary

Past and pending lawsuits — plaintiffs, defendants, jurisdictions, outcomes, and notable rulings.

Log in to generate
Not generated yet. Log in to request this analysis.

Proceedings on file (0)

All PTAB activity →

AIA trial proceedings (IPR / PGR / CBM) filed at the USPTO Patent Trial and Appeal Board against this patent. Sourced from the USPTO Open Data Portal and refreshed every six hours; each proceeding number deep-links to the PTAB E2E docket.

No PTAB proceedings on file. This patent has not been challenged via IPR, PGR, or CBM. The absence is itself a signal — well-asserted patents eventually attract IPRs. The LLM analysis below may surface filings the ODP feed hasn’t indexed yet.

PTAB challenges

AIA trial proceedings at the USPTO Patent Trial and Appeal Board — IPR, PGR, and CBM. Petitioners, judge panels, claim-level invalidation outcomes from Final Written Decisions, and Federal Circuit appeals. The single most important defensive datapoint after litigation history.

Log in to generate
Not generated yet. Log in to request this analysis.

Assignment history

Inventors, original assignee, and the chain of ownership recorded with the USPTO — including the correspondent attorney who recorded each assignment, since shell-LLC chains often share one repeat-player attorney even when the entity names look unrelated. Surfaces NPE / patent-troll patterns: shell-entity transfers, known asserters in the chain, repeat correspondent fingerprints, pre-litigation assignments, and bankruptcy fire-sales.

Log in to generate
Not generated yet. Log in to request this analysis.

Prior art

Earlier patents, publications, and products that may anticipate or render the claims unpatentable.

Log in to generate
Not generated yet. Log in to request this analysis.

Obviousness

Combinations of prior art that suggest the claimed invention would have been obvious under 35 U.S.C. § 103.

Log in to generate
Not generated yet. Log in to request this analysis.

Extensions

Patent term adjustments, term extensions, continuations, divisionals, family members, and expiration dates.

Log in to generate
Not generated yet. Log in to request this analysis.

Derivative works

Defensive disclosure: derivative variations of each claim designed to render future incremental improvements obvious or non-novel.

Log in to generate
Not generated yet. Log in to request this analysis.