Invalidity dossier
US 5418780
Routing logic means for a communication switching element
Current assignee: Alcatel Lucent NV
Added 9/23/2026, 5:53:26 PM
Active provider: DeepSeek · deepseek-flash
Patent summary
Title, assignee, inventors, filing/issue dates, abstract, and a plain-language overview of the claims.
Patent Overview — US 5,418,780 A
Title: Routing logic means for a communication switching element
Patent number: US 5,418,780 A (application US 07/668,582)
Inventor: Michel A. R. Henrion
Original assignee: Alcatel N.V.; current assignee listed as Alcatel Lucent NV
Priority date: 1990-03-14 · Filing date: 1991-03-13 · Grant/publication date: 1995-05-23
Status: Expired – Lifetime (anticipated expiration 2012-05-23)
Purpose. The patent addresses routing logic (RL) for a switching element (ISE) in a self-routing multi-stage switching network, where information is transferred from any inlet to at least one outlet according to routing data in an associated self-routing tag. The stated objects are: (1) to support switching elements of larger size (more inlets/outlets) and route information over a multiplicity of possible paths rather than a single deterministic path, improving performance and reliability; and (2) to allow flexible selection among a relatively large number of routing functions.
Plain-language scope. The switching element has at least three outlets, arranged into one or more "routing groups," each group containing from one to all outlets. The routing logic selects at least one routing group by deriving its identity from routing data containing at least one output-port-address, and transfers the information to one outlet belonging to each selected group. Separately, the self-routing tag includes a routing-control-code whose value selects, in each switching element, one of several routing functions to execute; each value identifies a specific transfer pattern — a predetermined sequence of routing functions executed across the network. Embodiments include unidirectional elements with 32 inlets/outlets, plus bidirectional and "reflection" arrangements using direction bits and grouped inlet/outlet sets (FIG. 1–3).
Not established by the excerpt. The supplied text is partial (it ends mid-sentence on routing groups) and includes no full claims, no prosecution history, and no prior-art analysis. It references other applications (Ser. No. 07/565,310; Ser. No. 07/776,337, now U.S. Pat. No. 5,237,565) only as incorporation by reference. Inventorship accuracy, claim scope, validity, ownership transfers, and litigation are not addressed.
Generated 10/1/2026, 9:43:13 PM
Cases on file (0)
Specific litigation cases in our database that name US patent 5418780. The free-form analysis below may also discuss cases beyond this list.
No cases on file mention this patent. Upload a CSV or add a case manually in Admin → Manage litigation cases.
Litigation summary
Past and pending lawsuits — plaintiffs, defendants, jurisdictions, outcomes, and notable rulings.
Proceedings on file (0)
All PTAB activity →AIA trial proceedings (IPR / PGR / CBM) filed at the USPTO Patent Trial and Appeal Board against this patent. Sourced from the USPTO Open Data Portal and refreshed every six hours; each proceeding number deep-links to the PTAB E2E docket.
No PTAB proceedings on file. This patent has not been challenged via IPR, PGR, or CBM. The absence is itself a signal — well-asserted patents eventually attract IPRs. The LLM analysis below may surface filings the ODP feed hasn’t indexed yet.
PTAB challenges
AIA trial proceedings at the USPTO Patent Trial and Appeal Board — IPR, PGR, and CBM. Petitioners, judge panels, claim-level invalidation outcomes from Final Written Decisions, and Federal Circuit appeals. The single most important defensive datapoint after litigation history.
Assignment history
Inventors, original assignee, and the chain of ownership recorded with the USPTO — including the correspondent attorney who recorded each assignment, since shell-LLC chains often share one repeat-player attorney even when the entity names look unrelated. Surfaces NPE / patent-troll patterns: shell-entity transfers, known asserters in the chain, repeat correspondent fingerprints, pre-litigation assignments, and bankruptcy fire-sales.
Prior art
Earlier patents, publications, and products that may anticipate or render the claims unpatentable.
Obviousness
Combinations of prior art that suggest the claimed invention would have been obvious under 35 U.S.C. § 103.
Extensions
Patent term adjustments, term extensions, continuations, divisionals, family members, and expiration dates.
Derivative works
Defensive disclosure: derivative variations of each claim designed to render future incremental improvements obvious or non-novel.