Invalidity dossier

US 5396350

Added 9/23/2026, 6:59:12 PM

At a glanceNo PTAB challengesNo litigation on file

Active provider: DeepSeek · deepseek-flash

Patent summary

Title, assignee, inventors, filing/issue dates, abstract, and a plain-language overview of the claims.

✓ Generated

Patent Overview — US 5,396,350 A

Title: "Backlighting apparatus employing an array of microprisms." The reference designates Karl W. Beeson, Scott M. Zimmerman, and Paul M. Ferm as inventors. Original assignee is AlliedSignal Inc.; the current assignee listed is Advanced Display Technologies of Texas LLC. Priority and filing date: 1993-11-05 (application US08/149,219). Publication/grant date: 1995-03-07. Status: Expired – Lifetime, with anticipated expiration 2013-11-05.

Purpose. The invention relates generally to flat panel electronic displays and, more particularly, to an apparatus for collimating light usable as a backlight providing relatively high light transmission for liquid crystal displays or the like. The text states it is directed to direct-view flat panel displays, specifically an LCD, having an improved backlight assembly giving an energy efficient and uniform light source, and also to any lighting application requiring a low profile, substantially collimated light source.

Plain-language scope (from the supplied text). A flat panel display comprises a modulating means (e.g., an LCD) spaced from a backlit assembly: a light source in close proximity to a light transmitting means, arranged so light rays travel through that means in a direction substantially parallel to the plane of the modulating means. A reflecting means, operatively disposed between and in close proximity to the light transmitting means and the modulating means, collimates the light rays. The light transmitting means may be a light pipe, light wedge, or slab waveguide; in described embodiments a slab waveguide transports light by total internal reflection, with an array of microprisms on one face. Each microprism has a light input surface adjacent the waveguide, a parallel distal output surface, and a tilted sidewall angled so rays escape the waveguide, reflect through the microprism via TIR, and emerge substantially collimated and perpendicular to the modulating means. Embodiments may use two light sources at oppositely disposed light-accepting surfaces.

Source: https://patents.google.com/patent/US5396350/en

What the excerpt does not establish. The provided text is explicitly excerpted and truncated (and the images are not rendered), so it does not set out the full specification, all claims, the complete drawing set, or the full list of cited prior art. Dates, status, and assignee entries are as listed by the source, which notes legal-status and assignee information are assumptions, not legal conclusions; no independent verification was performed.

Generated 10/1/2026, 9:42:23 PM

Cases on file (0)

Specific litigation cases in our database that name US patent 5396350. The free-form analysis below may also discuss cases beyond this list.

No cases on file mention this patent. Upload a CSV or add a case manually in Admin → Manage litigation cases.

Litigation summary

Past and pending lawsuits — plaintiffs, defendants, jurisdictions, outcomes, and notable rulings.

Log in to generate
Not generated yet. Log in to request this analysis.

Proceedings on file (0)

All PTAB activity →

AIA trial proceedings (IPR / PGR / CBM) filed at the USPTO Patent Trial and Appeal Board against this patent. Sourced from the USPTO Open Data Portal and refreshed every six hours; each proceeding number deep-links to the PTAB E2E docket.

No PTAB proceedings on file. This patent has not been challenged via IPR, PGR, or CBM. The absence is itself a signal — well-asserted patents eventually attract IPRs. The LLM analysis below may surface filings the ODP feed hasn’t indexed yet.

PTAB challenges

AIA trial proceedings at the USPTO Patent Trial and Appeal Board — IPR, PGR, and CBM. Petitioners, judge panels, claim-level invalidation outcomes from Final Written Decisions, and Federal Circuit appeals. The single most important defensive datapoint after litigation history.

Log in to generate
Not generated yet. Log in to request this analysis.

Assignment history

Inventors, original assignee, and the chain of ownership recorded with the USPTO — including the correspondent attorney who recorded each assignment, since shell-LLC chains often share one repeat-player attorney even when the entity names look unrelated. Surfaces NPE / patent-troll patterns: shell-entity transfers, known asserters in the chain, repeat correspondent fingerprints, pre-litigation assignments, and bankruptcy fire-sales.

Log in to generate
Not generated yet. Log in to request this analysis.

Prior art

Earlier patents, publications, and products that may anticipate or render the claims unpatentable.

Log in to generate
Not generated yet. Log in to request this analysis.

Obviousness

Combinations of prior art that suggest the claimed invention would have been obvious under 35 U.S.C. § 103.

Log in to generate
Not generated yet. Log in to request this analysis.

Extensions

Patent term adjustments, term extensions, continuations, divisionals, family members, and expiration dates.

Log in to generate
Not generated yet. Log in to request this analysis.

Derivative works

Defensive disclosure: derivative variations of each claim designed to render future incremental improvements obvious or non-novel.

Log in to generate
Not generated yet. Log in to request this analysis.