Invalidity dossier

US 5393990

HEMT structure

Current assignee: Infineon Technologies North America Corp

Added 9/21/2026, 3:36:02 AM

At a glanceNo PTAB challengesNo litigation on file

Active provider: DeepSeek · deepseek-flash

Patent summary

Title, assignee, inventors, filing/issue dates, abstract, and a plain-language overview of the claims.

✓ Generated

Patent Overview — US 5393990 A ("HEMT structure")

Bibliographic data (from the supplied text): Title: "HEMT structure." Inventor: Erhard Kohn. Original assignee: Siemens Corporate Research Inc.; current assignee listed as Infineon Technologies North America Corp. Application No. US 07/980,870, filed 1992-11-24 as a continuation of Ser. No. 07/333,207 filed 1989-04-04 (now abandoned); priority date 1989-04-04; granted/published 1995-02-28. Status: Expired – Fee Related; anticipated expiration 2012-02-28. Classification includes H10D30/4755 (modulation-doped HEMTs such as n-AlGaAs/GaAs HEMTs).

Purpose: The patent relates to field effect transistors, particularly high electron mobility transistors using gallium arsenide technology. A HEMT is a heterostructure of GaAs and AlGaAs; the heterojunction confines conduction electrons in an undoped GaAs buffer layer as a two-dimensional electron gas (2DEG), supplied from donor ions in an AlGaAs donor layer. The text states that DX-centers lie within the conduction band for AlGaAs only when the aluminum mole fraction is below about 0.2 or above about 0.7, so practice had used mole fractions of 0.2 or less — limiting the conduction-band difference, potential-well capacity, mutual conductance, current capacity, and high-frequency performance.

Plain-language scope: A HEMT with source, drain, and control (gate) electrodes comprises a GaAs buffer layer and an AlGaAs donor layer. The donor layer's composition profile has relatively high aluminum over a first thickness portion near the buffer, low and generally constant aluminum over a second portion distal from it, and a graded aluminum concentration in a third, intermediate portion. Its doping profile has a relatively high doping spike in the first thickness portion and relatively low doping over the second and third portions. A dependent aspect places the high-aluminum region and doping spike in a thin portion and drops aluminum step-wise to a negligibly small value toward the gate interface, with the doping spike substantially contained in the thin portion.

Not established by the excerpt: the full claim set and claim language, all drawing details, the complete specification, exact cited prior art, and omitted text. Source: https://patents.google.com/patent/US5393990/en

Generated 10/1/2026, 10:02:39 PM

Cases on file (0)

Specific litigation cases in our database that name US patent 5393990. The free-form analysis below may also discuss cases beyond this list.

No cases on file mention this patent. Upload a CSV or add a case manually in Admin → Manage litigation cases.

Litigation summary

Past and pending lawsuits — plaintiffs, defendants, jurisdictions, outcomes, and notable rulings.

Log in to generate
Not generated yet. Log in to request this analysis.

Proceedings on file (0)

All PTAB activity →

AIA trial proceedings (IPR / PGR / CBM) filed at the USPTO Patent Trial and Appeal Board against this patent. Sourced from the USPTO Open Data Portal and refreshed every six hours; each proceeding number deep-links to the PTAB E2E docket.

No PTAB proceedings on file. This patent has not been challenged via IPR, PGR, or CBM. The absence is itself a signal — well-asserted patents eventually attract IPRs. The LLM analysis below may surface filings the ODP feed hasn’t indexed yet.

PTAB challenges

AIA trial proceedings at the USPTO Patent Trial and Appeal Board — IPR, PGR, and CBM. Petitioners, judge panels, claim-level invalidation outcomes from Final Written Decisions, and Federal Circuit appeals. The single most important defensive datapoint after litigation history.

Log in to generate
Not generated yet. Log in to request this analysis.

Assignment history

Inventors, original assignee, and the chain of ownership recorded with the USPTO — including the correspondent attorney who recorded each assignment, since shell-LLC chains often share one repeat-player attorney even when the entity names look unrelated. Surfaces NPE / patent-troll patterns: shell-entity transfers, known asserters in the chain, repeat correspondent fingerprints, pre-litigation assignments, and bankruptcy fire-sales.

Log in to generate
Not generated yet. Log in to request this analysis.

Prior art

Earlier patents, publications, and products that may anticipate or render the claims unpatentable.

Log in to generate
Not generated yet. Log in to request this analysis.

Obviousness

Combinations of prior art that suggest the claimed invention would have been obvious under 35 U.S.C. § 103.

Log in to generate
Not generated yet. Log in to request this analysis.

Extensions

Patent term adjustments, term extensions, continuations, divisionals, family members, and expiration dates.

Log in to generate
Not generated yet. Log in to request this analysis.

Derivative works

Defensive disclosure: derivative variations of each claim designed to render future incremental improvements obvious or non-novel.

Log in to generate
Not generated yet. Log in to request this analysis.