Invalidity dossier

US 5363470

Added 9/23/2026, 12:17:25 PM

At a glanceNo PTAB challengesNo litigation on file

Active provider: DeepSeek · deepseek-flash

Patent summary

Title, assignee, inventors, filing/issue dates, abstract, and a plain-language overview of the claims.

✓ Generated

Patent Overview — US 5,363,470

Title: "Displacing an optical lighting film's linear array of grooves to facilitate emission of light"

Patent number / application: US 5,363,470 A; Application US 08/089,288

Inventor: David L. Wortman

Assignee: Minnesota Mining and Manufacturing Co. (original); 3M Co (current assignee listed)

Key dates: Priority/filing 1993-07-08; granted/publication 1994-11-08; anticipated expiration 2013-07-08 (status: Expired – Lifetime)

Purpose: The patent addresses light conduits for transporting and distributing light. Conventionally, such conduits use optical lighting film — flexible transparent polymeric sheets with a structured surface of side-by-side, substantially right-angled isosceles prisms forming linear grooves — that totally internally reflect light entering below a critical angle. Extracting light conventionally required adding an extractor such as a diffuse scatterer (e.g., a reflective white polymeric tape), which must be physically added and becomes less effective as depleted zones form along longer conduits.

Plain-language scope: Rather than adding a separate extractor, the invention orients the film's linear array of grooves non-parallel to the conduit's longitudinal axis. In an embodiment with a tubular, circular-cross-section conduit, the grooves are helical. This non-parallel disposition causes some or all light that would otherwise be totally internally reflected to fall outside the critical angle, facilitating increased light emission. It also makes light rays travelling through the axis follow non-planar (spiralling) paths within the conduit, spiralling in the same rotational direction as the grooves. A diffuse scatterer may optionally be placed on the interior wall in conjunction with the spiralled grooves to further increase emitted-light intensity along the conduit's length.

Source URL: https://patents.google.com/patent/US5363470/en

What the excerpt does not establish: It provides only the abstract/definitions portion and a figure list (the specification text is truncated after FIG. 8). It does not supply the full claims, the complete written description, exact numerical ranges or angles, detailed embodiments, or the full figures. It also does not independently verify assignee status or legal status beyond what the source page lists.

Generated 10/1/2026, 9:53:42 PM

Cases on file (0)

Specific litigation cases in our database that name US patent 5363470. The free-form analysis below may also discuss cases beyond this list.

No cases on file mention this patent. Upload a CSV or add a case manually in Admin → Manage litigation cases.

Litigation summary

Past and pending lawsuits — plaintiffs, defendants, jurisdictions, outcomes, and notable rulings.

Log in to generate
Not generated yet. Log in to request this analysis.

Proceedings on file (0)

All PTAB activity →

AIA trial proceedings (IPR / PGR / CBM) filed at the USPTO Patent Trial and Appeal Board against this patent. Sourced from the USPTO Open Data Portal and refreshed every six hours; each proceeding number deep-links to the PTAB E2E docket.

No PTAB proceedings on file. This patent has not been challenged via IPR, PGR, or CBM. The absence is itself a signal — well-asserted patents eventually attract IPRs. The LLM analysis below may surface filings the ODP feed hasn’t indexed yet.

PTAB challenges

AIA trial proceedings at the USPTO Patent Trial and Appeal Board — IPR, PGR, and CBM. Petitioners, judge panels, claim-level invalidation outcomes from Final Written Decisions, and Federal Circuit appeals. The single most important defensive datapoint after litigation history.

Log in to generate
Not generated yet. Log in to request this analysis.

Assignment history

Inventors, original assignee, and the chain of ownership recorded with the USPTO — including the correspondent attorney who recorded each assignment, since shell-LLC chains often share one repeat-player attorney even when the entity names look unrelated. Surfaces NPE / patent-troll patterns: shell-entity transfers, known asserters in the chain, repeat correspondent fingerprints, pre-litigation assignments, and bankruptcy fire-sales.

Log in to generate
Not generated yet. Log in to request this analysis.

Prior art

Earlier patents, publications, and products that may anticipate or render the claims unpatentable.

Log in to generate
Not generated yet. Log in to request this analysis.

Obviousness

Combinations of prior art that suggest the claimed invention would have been obvious under 35 U.S.C. § 103.

Log in to generate
Not generated yet. Log in to request this analysis.

Extensions

Patent term adjustments, term extensions, continuations, divisionals, family members, and expiration dates.

Log in to generate
Not generated yet. Log in to request this analysis.

Derivative works

Defensive disclosure: derivative variations of each claim designed to render future incremental improvements obvious or non-novel.

Log in to generate
Not generated yet. Log in to request this analysis.