Invalidity dossier

US 5172338

Multi-state EEprom read and write circuits and techniques

Current assignee: SanDisk Technologies LLC

Added 9/23/2026, 11:39:05 PM

At a glanceNo PTAB challengesNo litigation on file

Active provider: DeepSeek · deepseek-flash

Patent summary

Title, assignee, inventors, filing/issue dates, abstract, and a plain-language overview of the claims.

✓ Generated

Patent Overview — US5172338A

Title: Multi-state EEprom read and write circuits and techniques
Patent number: US5172338A (also published as US5172338B1)
Application number: US07/508,273
Inventors: Sanjay Mehrotra, Eliyahou Harari, Winston Lee
Original assignee: SanDisk Corp (assignment recorded 1990-06-13 to SunDisk Corporation, a corp. of DE)
Current assignee listed: SanDisk Technologies LLC
Priority date: 1989-04-13
Filing date: 1990-04-11
Publication/grant date: 1992-12-15
Legal status: Expired – Lifetime (anticipated expiration 2014-07-08)

Purpose and plain-language scope

The patent concerns EEPROM memory circuits and methods for reading and writing cells that store more than two stable states — i.e., multi-state (multi-level) storage rather than simple binary storage. Per the classifications in the supplied text, the subject matter covers: storage elements having more than two stable states represented by steps (e.g., voltage, current, phase, frequency), using charge storage in a floating gate; programming/writing circuits and data input circuits; erasing circuits including block, array, word and group erase; sensing/reading circuits with differential sensing or reference/dummy cells; and verification of programming status, e.g., threshold voltage, overprogramming or underprogramming, and retention.

In plain terms, the excerpt indicates the patent addresses circuits and techniques for storing multiple data states per EEPROM cell and for reliably reading back and writing those states, including sensing against references and verifying programmed threshold levels.

Priority family filings noted in the excerpt: PCT/US1990/001984 (WO1990012400A1); EP90906720 (EP0539358B1); EP96114367 (EP0774759B1); EP96114368 (EP0778582B1); EP96115502 (EP0756287B1); JP2506478 (JPH04507320A); and corresponding DE publications.

What the excerpt does not establish

The supplied text contains no claims, no detailed description, and no drawings text. It therefore does not establish the specific claim scope, the exact circuit topologies, the number of states per cell, or any prior-art references relied upon. It also does not establish the accuracy of the listed assignees or legal-status assumptions, which the source itself disclaims. No litigation, ownership-transfer, validity, or prior-art analysis is made here.

Source: https://patents.google.com/patent/[US5172338](/patent/US5172338)/en

Generated 10/1/2026, 9:32:36 PM

Cases on file (0)

Specific litigation cases in our database that name US patent 5172338. The free-form analysis below may also discuss cases beyond this list.

No cases on file mention this patent. Upload a CSV or add a case manually in Admin → Manage litigation cases.

Litigation summary

Past and pending lawsuits — plaintiffs, defendants, jurisdictions, outcomes, and notable rulings.

Log in to generate
Not generated yet. Log in to request this analysis.

Proceedings on file (0)

All PTAB activity →

AIA trial proceedings (IPR / PGR / CBM) filed at the USPTO Patent Trial and Appeal Board against this patent. Sourced from the USPTO Open Data Portal and refreshed every six hours; each proceeding number deep-links to the PTAB E2E docket.

No PTAB proceedings on file. This patent has not been challenged via IPR, PGR, or CBM. The absence is itself a signal — well-asserted patents eventually attract IPRs. The LLM analysis below may surface filings the ODP feed hasn’t indexed yet.

PTAB challenges

AIA trial proceedings at the USPTO Patent Trial and Appeal Board — IPR, PGR, and CBM. Petitioners, judge panels, claim-level invalidation outcomes from Final Written Decisions, and Federal Circuit appeals. The single most important defensive datapoint after litigation history.

Log in to generate
Not generated yet. Log in to request this analysis.

Assignment history

Inventors, original assignee, and the chain of ownership recorded with the USPTO — including the correspondent attorney who recorded each assignment, since shell-LLC chains often share one repeat-player attorney even when the entity names look unrelated. Surfaces NPE / patent-troll patterns: shell-entity transfers, known asserters in the chain, repeat correspondent fingerprints, pre-litigation assignments, and bankruptcy fire-sales.

Log in to generate
Not generated yet. Log in to request this analysis.

Prior art

Earlier patents, publications, and products that may anticipate or render the claims unpatentable.

Log in to generate
Not generated yet. Log in to request this analysis.

Obviousness

Combinations of prior art that suggest the claimed invention would have been obvious under 35 U.S.C. § 103.

Log in to generate
Not generated yet. Log in to request this analysis.

Extensions

Patent term adjustments, term extensions, continuations, divisionals, family members, and expiration dates.

Log in to generate
Not generated yet. Log in to request this analysis.

Derivative works

Defensive disclosure: derivative variations of each claim designed to render future incremental improvements obvious or non-novel.

Log in to generate
Not generated yet. Log in to request this analysis.