Invalidity dossier

US 4857379

Sheetlike structure of fibers, especially as a reinforcement for plastics components

Current assignee: Verseidag Industrietextilien GmbH

Added 9/21/2026, 9:32:08 AM

At a glanceNo PTAB challengesNo litigation on file

Active provider: DeepSeek · deepseek-flash

Patent summary

Title, assignee, inventors, filing/issue dates, abstract, and a plain-language overview of the claims.

✓ Generated

Patent Overview — US 4,857,379 A

Title: Sheetlike structure of fibers, especially as a reinforcement for plastics components

Patent number: US4857379A

Assignee: Verseidag Industrietextilien GmbH (original and current assignee per the listing)

Inventor(s): Margret Plontges; Herbert Cox

Key dates (as listed):

  • Priority date: 1986-10-24 (claimed from DE19863636300)
  • Further priority claimed 1987-04-03 (DE19873711213)
  • Filing date: 1987-10-19
  • Publication/grant date: 1989-08-15
  • Anticipated expiration: 2007-10-19; status "Expired – Fee Related"

Purpose (stated in the supplied text): The invention relates to a sheetlike structure of fibers useful as a reinforcement for plastics components, comprising plastics threads lying in the warp and weft directions. Its stated object is to provide a two-dimensional structure that, with low weight and relatively low manufacturing costs, is readily deformable and thus usable in diverse ways as a reinforcement.

Plain-language scope (from the supplied definitions and figures): The structure is built from plastics threads running in warp and weft directions, crossing one another (FIG. 1 shows a plan view of a laid fabric of crossing threads; FIG. 2 concerns a bonding arrangement). In use, the sheetlike fiber structure is held taut and then heated — either by a heat source or by application of a hot plastics material — so that it shrinks; because the reinforcement is fixed (held taut), tension persists in the reinforced plastics component, producing a prestressed reinforcement.

Classifications (selected): B29C70/10, B29C70/16, B29C70/22 (fibrous reinforcements, 2D oriented structures); D03D15/567 (shapes/effects upon shrinkage); D04B21/14–21/16; B63H9/0678 (laminated sails); plus various Y10T fabric/strand index codes including heat-shrinkable strand.

Source: https://patents.google.com/patent/US4857379/en

What the excerpt does not establish: The supplied text is an excerpt (figures/images and portions of the description are omitted). It does not provide the full claims, the complete written description, detailed thread materials or dimensions, the bonding method of FIG. 2, or examples. Claims scope, prosecution history, validity, ownership transfers, and prior art are not established here; this overview does not address them.

Generated 10/1/2026, 10:02:13 PM

Cases on file (0)

Specific litigation cases in our database that name US patent 4857379. The free-form analysis below may also discuss cases beyond this list.

No cases on file mention this patent. Upload a CSV or add a case manually in Admin → Manage litigation cases.

Litigation summary

Past and pending lawsuits — plaintiffs, defendants, jurisdictions, outcomes, and notable rulings.

Log in to generate
Not generated yet. Log in to request this analysis.

Proceedings on file (0)

All PTAB activity →

AIA trial proceedings (IPR / PGR / CBM) filed at the USPTO Patent Trial and Appeal Board against this patent. Sourced from the USPTO Open Data Portal and refreshed every six hours; each proceeding number deep-links to the PTAB E2E docket.

No PTAB proceedings on file. This patent has not been challenged via IPR, PGR, or CBM. The absence is itself a signal — well-asserted patents eventually attract IPRs. The LLM analysis below may surface filings the ODP feed hasn’t indexed yet.

PTAB challenges

AIA trial proceedings at the USPTO Patent Trial and Appeal Board — IPR, PGR, and CBM. Petitioners, judge panels, claim-level invalidation outcomes from Final Written Decisions, and Federal Circuit appeals. The single most important defensive datapoint after litigation history.

Log in to generate
Not generated yet. Log in to request this analysis.

Assignment history

Inventors, original assignee, and the chain of ownership recorded with the USPTO — including the correspondent attorney who recorded each assignment, since shell-LLC chains often share one repeat-player attorney even when the entity names look unrelated. Surfaces NPE / patent-troll patterns: shell-entity transfers, known asserters in the chain, repeat correspondent fingerprints, pre-litigation assignments, and bankruptcy fire-sales.

Log in to generate
Not generated yet. Log in to request this analysis.

Prior art

Earlier patents, publications, and products that may anticipate or render the claims unpatentable.

Log in to generate
Not generated yet. Log in to request this analysis.

Obviousness

Combinations of prior art that suggest the claimed invention would have been obvious under 35 U.S.C. § 103.

Log in to generate
Not generated yet. Log in to request this analysis.

Extensions

Patent term adjustments, term extensions, continuations, divisionals, family members, and expiration dates.

Log in to generate
Not generated yet. Log in to request this analysis.

Derivative works

Defensive disclosure: derivative variations of each claim designed to render future incremental improvements obvious or non-novel.

Log in to generate
Not generated yet. Log in to request this analysis.