Invalidity dossier

US 4704686

Method of manufacturing of individually formed prothesis or implant

Current assignee: Individual

Added 9/24/2026, 12:18:37 AM

At a glanceNo PTAB challengesNo litigation on file

Active provider: DeepSeek · deepseek-flash

Patent summary

Title, assignee, inventors, filing/issue dates, abstract, and a plain-language overview of the claims.

✓ Generated

Patent Overview — US4704686A

Title: Method of manufacturing of individually formed prothesis or implant

Patent number: US4704686A
Application number: US06/865,551
Inventor: Gunther Aldinger
Original/Current Assignee: Individual
Prior art date: 1982-04-10
Filing date: 1986-05-20
Publication/grant date: 1987-11-03
Anticipated expiration: 2004-11-03
Legal status: Expired – Fee Related

Purpose (from the supplied text): The patent concerns manufacturing a prosthesis or implant formed individually for a patient. The prior-art keywords listed — bone, pin, cavity, determining, contour — indicate the disclosed approach centers on determining bone contour and using pins and a cavity in fabricating the implant, with anchoring, bone density, thigh bone (femur), and hip joint among the recurring concepts in the description.

Plain-language scope: Based only on the supplied excerpt, the invention is a method for making a custom-fit prosthesis or implant rather than a standardized, off-the-shelf one. The classification assigned is A61F2/30942 — "Designing or manufacturing processes for designing or making customized prostheses, e.g. using templates, CT or NMR scans, finite-element analysis or CAD-CAM techniques" — which places the subject matter in computer-assisted, patient-specific implant fabrication. Related classifications cover femoral heads/endoprostheses and femoral shafts (A61F2/36, A61F2/3662) and joints for the hip (A61F2/32), consistent with hip-implant applications. The excerpt references computing, measuring, testing, machining, casting, forging, milling, and turning as manufacturing steps, plus materials such as metal, plastic, ceramic, bone cement, and titanium alloy.

Source: https://patents.google.com/patent/[US4704686](/patent/US4704686)/en

What the excerpt does not establish: It does not reproduce the claims, abstract, or full description, so the precise claimed scope, claim dependencies, and limitations cannot be stated. It does not establish the priority basis or whether the 1982-04-10 date is a foreign priority rather than a US filing. It does not identify the "Individual" assignee by name or address. It does not confirm any prior-art reference, litigation, ownership transfer, or validity determination. Google's own notes caution that assignee listings, priority dates, and legal status are assumptions and not legal conclusions.

Generated 10/1/2026, 9:31:59 PM

Cases on file (0)

Specific litigation cases in our database that name US patent 4704686. The free-form analysis below may also discuss cases beyond this list.

No cases on file mention this patent. Upload a CSV or add a case manually in Admin → Manage litigation cases.

Litigation summary

Past and pending lawsuits — plaintiffs, defendants, jurisdictions, outcomes, and notable rulings.

Log in to generate
Not generated yet. Log in to request this analysis.

Proceedings on file (0)

All PTAB activity →

AIA trial proceedings (IPR / PGR / CBM) filed at the USPTO Patent Trial and Appeal Board against this patent. Sourced from the USPTO Open Data Portal and refreshed every six hours; each proceeding number deep-links to the PTAB E2E docket.

No PTAB proceedings on file. This patent has not been challenged via IPR, PGR, or CBM. The absence is itself a signal — well-asserted patents eventually attract IPRs. The LLM analysis below may surface filings the ODP feed hasn’t indexed yet.

PTAB challenges

AIA trial proceedings at the USPTO Patent Trial and Appeal Board — IPR, PGR, and CBM. Petitioners, judge panels, claim-level invalidation outcomes from Final Written Decisions, and Federal Circuit appeals. The single most important defensive datapoint after litigation history.

Log in to generate
Not generated yet. Log in to request this analysis.

Assignment history

Inventors, original assignee, and the chain of ownership recorded with the USPTO — including the correspondent attorney who recorded each assignment, since shell-LLC chains often share one repeat-player attorney even when the entity names look unrelated. Surfaces NPE / patent-troll patterns: shell-entity transfers, known asserters in the chain, repeat correspondent fingerprints, pre-litigation assignments, and bankruptcy fire-sales.

Log in to generate
Not generated yet. Log in to request this analysis.

Prior art

Earlier patents, publications, and products that may anticipate or render the claims unpatentable.

Log in to generate
Not generated yet. Log in to request this analysis.

Obviousness

Combinations of prior art that suggest the claimed invention would have been obvious under 35 U.S.C. § 103.

Log in to generate
Not generated yet. Log in to request this analysis.

Extensions

Patent term adjustments, term extensions, continuations, divisionals, family members, and expiration dates.

Log in to generate
Not generated yet. Log in to request this analysis.

Derivative works

Defensive disclosure: derivative variations of each claim designed to render future incremental improvements obvious or non-novel.

Log in to generate
Not generated yet. Log in to request this analysis.