Invalidity dossier

US 4657904

Sulfur-containing bis-imino carbamate compounds, pesticidal composition and use

Current assignee: Rhone Poulenc Nederland BV

Added 9/23/2026, 1:46:42 PM

At a glanceNo PTAB challengesNo litigation on file

Active provider: DeepSeek · deepseek-flash

Patent summary

Title, assignee, inventors, filing/issue dates, abstract, and a plain-language overview of the claims.

✓ Generated

Patent Overview — US4657904A

Title: Sulfur-containing bis-imino carbamate compounds, pesticidal composition and use

Patent number: US4657904A

Inventor: Themistocles D. J. D'Silva

Assignee/ownership as listed: Original assignee Union Carbide Corp.; current assignee listed as Rhone Poulenc Nederland BV (per the source's own disclaimer that listed assignees "may be inaccurate"). The text also records assignments to Union Carbide Agricultural Products Company, Inc. and Rhone Poulenc Nederlands B.V.

Key dates: Priority date 1978-11-03 (claimed from US05/957,561); filing date 1986-05-16 (application US06/864,274); publication/grant 1987-04-14. Status listed as "Expired - Fee Related"; anticipated expiration 2004-04-14.

Purpose: The invention "relates to methods and compositions for controlling insect, acarid and nematode pests," and to "novel carbamate compounds and to their methods of preparation." The compounds are described as "relatively non-phytotoxic and relatively non-toxic to mammals when used in amounts sufficient to kill plant pests."

Plain-language scope: The claims concern sulfur-containing bis-imino carbamate compounds built from oxime reactants and bis-carbamoyl fluorides, defined by variable groups R, R', R1, R2, R3 (individually C1–C4 alkyl), R4, R5, R6 and R7, plus a divalent aliphatic chain "A" completing a five- or six-membered heterocyclic ring that may contain oxygen, sulfur, sulfinyl, sulfonyl, amino, alkylamino or carbonyl groups. The excerpt describes preparation via Methods I–III using an acid acceptor (organic or inorganic base) in inert, aqueous or two-phase solvent, optionally with a phase transfer agent, at about −40°C to 120°C. Pesticidal activity was evaluated against mites, nematodes, an aphid, a caterpillar, a beetle and a fly, with test suspensions at 500 ppm.

Source: https://patents.google.com/patent/[US4657904](/patent/US4657904)/en

What the excerpt does not establish: It does not provide the full claim text or claim count; complete Markush definitions and formulas (several are truncated); yield, purity or identity of specific compounds; quantitative test results; full utility data; or the complete specification, examples and drawings. It also does not establish the accuracy of the listed assignees or legal status.

Generated 10/1/2026, 9:52:51 PM

Cases on file (0)

Specific litigation cases in our database that name US patent 4657904. The free-form analysis below may also discuss cases beyond this list.

No cases on file mention this patent. Upload a CSV or add a case manually in Admin → Manage litigation cases.

Litigation summary

Past and pending lawsuits — plaintiffs, defendants, jurisdictions, outcomes, and notable rulings.

Log in to generate
Not generated yet. Log in to request this analysis.

Proceedings on file (0)

All PTAB activity →

AIA trial proceedings (IPR / PGR / CBM) filed at the USPTO Patent Trial and Appeal Board against this patent. Sourced from the USPTO Open Data Portal and refreshed every six hours; each proceeding number deep-links to the PTAB E2E docket.

No PTAB proceedings on file. This patent has not been challenged via IPR, PGR, or CBM. The absence is itself a signal — well-asserted patents eventually attract IPRs. The LLM analysis below may surface filings the ODP feed hasn’t indexed yet.

PTAB challenges

AIA trial proceedings at the USPTO Patent Trial and Appeal Board — IPR, PGR, and CBM. Petitioners, judge panels, claim-level invalidation outcomes from Final Written Decisions, and Federal Circuit appeals. The single most important defensive datapoint after litigation history.

Log in to generate
Not generated yet. Log in to request this analysis.

Assignment history

Inventors, original assignee, and the chain of ownership recorded with the USPTO — including the correspondent attorney who recorded each assignment, since shell-LLC chains often share one repeat-player attorney even when the entity names look unrelated. Surfaces NPE / patent-troll patterns: shell-entity transfers, known asserters in the chain, repeat correspondent fingerprints, pre-litigation assignments, and bankruptcy fire-sales.

Log in to generate
Not generated yet. Log in to request this analysis.

Prior art

Earlier patents, publications, and products that may anticipate or render the claims unpatentable.

Log in to generate
Not generated yet. Log in to request this analysis.

Obviousness

Combinations of prior art that suggest the claimed invention would have been obvious under 35 U.S.C. § 103.

Log in to generate
Not generated yet. Log in to request this analysis.

Extensions

Patent term adjustments, term extensions, continuations, divisionals, family members, and expiration dates.

Log in to generate
Not generated yet. Log in to request this analysis.

Derivative works

Defensive disclosure: derivative variations of each claim designed to render future incremental improvements obvious or non-novel.

Log in to generate
Not generated yet. Log in to request this analysis.