Invalidity dossier

US 4481522

CCD Imagers with substrates having drift field

Current assignee: RCA Corp

Added 9/23/2026, 10:18:47 AM

At a glanceNo PTAB challengesNo litigation on file

Active provider: DeepSeek · deepseek-flash

Patent summary

Title, assignee, inventors, filing/issue dates, abstract, and a plain-language overview of the claims.

✓ Generated

Patent Overview — US 4,481,522 A

Title: CCD Imagers with substrates having drift field

Assignee/Applicant: RCA Corp (original assignee; recorded assignment to RCA Corporation, a Corp. of DE)

Inventors: Lubomir L. Jastrzebski and Peter A. Levine

Dates: Priority/filing date 1982-03-24; publication/grant 1984-11-06; anticipated expiration 2002-03-24; status listed as "Expired – Lifetime."

Purpose: The invention concerns charge-coupled device (CCD) imagers with drift fields in their semiconductive substrates to improve CCD operation. It addresses background "striation" patterns in the detected television image, attributed in the text largely to non-uniformity in the density of bulk charge recombination centers, and also cross-talk/cross-color in color-filtered imagers. The stated approach is to create a field—such as a drift field—in the substrate to sweep minority carriers generated in the bulk further into the bulk, away from the electrode-bearing surface, so they recombine with majority carriers instead of reaching depletion regions under gate electrodes. A drift field is said to be generatable by grading impurity doping concentration so it decreases with increasing distance from the surface adjoining the CCD shift-register charge transfer channels.

Plain-language scope (from the excerpt): A CCD imager whose semiconductor substrate includes a doping gradient producing a drift field that drives bulk-generated minority carriers away from the surface where charge transfer channels and gate electrodes reside, reducing striations and cross-talk. The disclosure notes applicability to surface-channel imagers (especially anti-blooming mode) and to suppressing cross-talk in buried-channel imagers; clocking scheme is described as incidental. Figures include a profile/doping-concentration plot (FIGS. 1a–1b), a recombination-probability graph (FIG. 2), color camera block diagrams, and a plan view of a representative CCD imager.

Source: https://patents.google.com/patent/US4481522/en

Not established by this excerpt: The full claim language and exact claimed scope; the complete detailed description and omitted text; the precise fabrication methods or process parameters; and the listed classification scope/definitions beyond those shown.

Generated 10/1/2026, 9:54:11 PM

Cases on file (0)

Specific litigation cases in our database that name US patent 4481522. The free-form analysis below may also discuss cases beyond this list.

No cases on file mention this patent. Upload a CSV or add a case manually in Admin → Manage litigation cases.

Litigation summary

Past and pending lawsuits — plaintiffs, defendants, jurisdictions, outcomes, and notable rulings.

Log in to generate
Not generated yet. Log in to request this analysis.

Proceedings on file (0)

All PTAB activity →

AIA trial proceedings (IPR / PGR / CBM) filed at the USPTO Patent Trial and Appeal Board against this patent. Sourced from the USPTO Open Data Portal and refreshed every six hours; each proceeding number deep-links to the PTAB E2E docket.

No PTAB proceedings on file. This patent has not been challenged via IPR, PGR, or CBM. The absence is itself a signal — well-asserted patents eventually attract IPRs. The LLM analysis below may surface filings the ODP feed hasn’t indexed yet.

PTAB challenges

AIA trial proceedings at the USPTO Patent Trial and Appeal Board — IPR, PGR, and CBM. Petitioners, judge panels, claim-level invalidation outcomes from Final Written Decisions, and Federal Circuit appeals. The single most important defensive datapoint after litigation history.

Log in to generate
Not generated yet. Log in to request this analysis.

Assignment history

Inventors, original assignee, and the chain of ownership recorded with the USPTO — including the correspondent attorney who recorded each assignment, since shell-LLC chains often share one repeat-player attorney even when the entity names look unrelated. Surfaces NPE / patent-troll patterns: shell-entity transfers, known asserters in the chain, repeat correspondent fingerprints, pre-litigation assignments, and bankruptcy fire-sales.

Log in to generate
Not generated yet. Log in to request this analysis.

Prior art

Earlier patents, publications, and products that may anticipate or render the claims unpatentable.

Log in to generate
Not generated yet. Log in to request this analysis.

Obviousness

Combinations of prior art that suggest the claimed invention would have been obvious under 35 U.S.C. § 103.

Log in to generate
Not generated yet. Log in to request this analysis.

Extensions

Patent term adjustments, term extensions, continuations, divisionals, family members, and expiration dates.

Log in to generate
Not generated yet. Log in to request this analysis.

Derivative works

Defensive disclosure: derivative variations of each claim designed to render future incremental improvements obvious or non-novel.

Log in to generate
Not generated yet. Log in to request this analysis.