Invalidity dossier

US 4167814

Added 9/23/2026, 1:01:22 PM

At a glanceNo PTAB challengesNo litigation on file

Active provider: DeepSeek · deepseek-flash

Patent summary

Title, assignee, inventors, filing/issue dates, abstract, and a plain-language overview of the claims.

✓ Generated

Patent Overview — US 4,167,814

Title: Mouth prop and oral evacuation device
Patent number: US 4,167,814 A
Application number: US05/786,147
Inventor: Robert E. Schubert
Assignee: Individual (original assignee: Individual)
Filing date / Priority date: 1977-04-11
Publication (grant) date: 1979-09-18
Legal status (as listed): Expired – Lifetime; anticipated expiration 1997-04-11
Source: https://patents.google.com/patent/US4167814/en

Purpose: Dental work such as drilling and grinding uses a sprayed cooling/washing fluid that must be constantly removed, while the mouth is held open and the tongue kept away from the work area. The patent addresses the drawbacks of prior evacuation devices and tongue shields — particularly the lack of adequate means for holding an evacuation device in place, and complicated, difficult-to-use designs. The stated objects are to provide a combined oral evacuation and mouth prop device, and one that also includes a tongue shield.

Plain-language scope (per the supplied description and abstract): A generally U-shaped suction tube fits inside the lower jaw, below the tongue and inside the row of teeth. One leg has a closed end; the other has an upwardly turned portion with a forwardly extending connecting tube for attachment to a suction hose. Fluid-collecting perforations are placed in the lower portion of the tube so the openings remain under the fluid and do not lose suction by becoming uncovered. A wedge-shaped mouth prop, preferably of resilient plastic or rubber, fits between the upper and lower teeth and holds the tube in place. A tongue guard extends upward from the tube and curves inward above the tongue. The prop and tube are preferably joined by easily releasable means such as resilient detent ribs, allowing independent construction, different sizes, selective assembly, and possible disposability. FIG. 5 shows an alternate arrangement with a tube closed at both ends and a connecting conduit spaced from the closed end, permitting the tube leg to extend further back in the mouth.

Not established by the excerpt: the full claims and their exact wording, the complete description (text is expressly excerpted), the detailed content of FIGS. 1–5 and the section taken on line 3—3, and the specifics of the alternate connecting means mentioned as possible.

Generated 10/1/2026, 9:53:19 PM

Cases on file (0)

Specific litigation cases in our database that name US patent 4167814. The free-form analysis below may also discuss cases beyond this list.

No cases on file mention this patent. Upload a CSV or add a case manually in Admin → Manage litigation cases.

Litigation summary

Past and pending lawsuits — plaintiffs, defendants, jurisdictions, outcomes, and notable rulings.

Log in to generate
Not generated yet. Log in to request this analysis.

Proceedings on file (0)

All PTAB activity →

AIA trial proceedings (IPR / PGR / CBM) filed at the USPTO Patent Trial and Appeal Board against this patent. Sourced from the USPTO Open Data Portal and refreshed every six hours; each proceeding number deep-links to the PTAB E2E docket.

No PTAB proceedings on file. This patent has not been challenged via IPR, PGR, or CBM. The absence is itself a signal — well-asserted patents eventually attract IPRs. The LLM analysis below may surface filings the ODP feed hasn’t indexed yet.

PTAB challenges

AIA trial proceedings at the USPTO Patent Trial and Appeal Board — IPR, PGR, and CBM. Petitioners, judge panels, claim-level invalidation outcomes from Final Written Decisions, and Federal Circuit appeals. The single most important defensive datapoint after litigation history.

Log in to generate
Not generated yet. Log in to request this analysis.

Assignment history

Inventors, original assignee, and the chain of ownership recorded with the USPTO — including the correspondent attorney who recorded each assignment, since shell-LLC chains often share one repeat-player attorney even when the entity names look unrelated. Surfaces NPE / patent-troll patterns: shell-entity transfers, known asserters in the chain, repeat correspondent fingerprints, pre-litigation assignments, and bankruptcy fire-sales.

Log in to generate
Not generated yet. Log in to request this analysis.

Prior art

Earlier patents, publications, and products that may anticipate or render the claims unpatentable.

Log in to generate
Not generated yet. Log in to request this analysis.

Obviousness

Combinations of prior art that suggest the claimed invention would have been obvious under 35 U.S.C. § 103.

Log in to generate
Not generated yet. Log in to request this analysis.

Extensions

Patent term adjustments, term extensions, continuations, divisionals, family members, and expiration dates.

Log in to generate
Not generated yet. Log in to request this analysis.

Derivative works

Defensive disclosure: derivative variations of each claim designed to render future incremental improvements obvious or non-novel.

Log in to generate
Not generated yet. Log in to request this analysis.