Invalidity dossier

US 3752974

Uniform illumination with edge lighting

Current assignee: COASTAL DYNAMICS INCORPORATED A CORP OF OREG

Added 9/23/2026, 5:56:55 PM

At a glanceNo PTAB challengesNo litigation on file

Active provider: DeepSeek · deepseek-flash

Patent summary

Title, assignee, inventors, filing/issue dates, abstract, and a plain-language overview of the claims.

✓ Generated

Patent Overview — US 3752974 A

Title: Uniform illumination with edge lighting

Patent number: US 3752974 A (application US00207218A; also referenced as US3752974D A / US3752974DA)

Inventors: M. Baker; L. Myers

Assignee: Coastal Dynamics Corp (original assignee). The record also lists a current assignee, "COASTAL DYNAMICS INCORPORATED A CORP OF OREG," and shows reassignments to Allied Healthcare Products, Inc. (1981) and to Coastal Dynamics, Incorporated, a Corp. of Oregon (1982). Legal status is listed as "Expired – Lifetime."

Key dates: Prior art date and filing date: 1971-12-13. Publication/grant date: 1973-08-14. Anticipated expiration: 1990-08-14.

Purpose: The patent addresses lighting technique, specifically an improved system for providing substantially uniform illumination from edge-lighted optical media. Edge-lit panels minimize depth while illuminating a relatively large flat surface, but the excerpt states the resulting illumination "is still not uniform; that is, it tends to fall off with increasing distance from the light source measured in a plane parallel to the plane of the panel or optical medium itself." The stated primary object is to improve emission of substantially uniform light from a large surface using edge lighting while keeping wasted light to an absolute minimum.

Plain-language scope: Per the excerpt, the improvement involves diffusing one surface portion that normally provides internal reflection, so that at least some light rays striking the diffused surface are reflected through the opposite surface while others are refracted out through that same surface. A stated important feature is a "cleared area" about the light source, free of coating, with a radius preferably three to four times the thickness of the optical medium; beyond the cleared area the resulting light emission from the medium's surface is substantially uniform. The excerpt mentions 12 claims and 9 drawing figures.

Source: https://patents.google.com/patent/US3752974/en

What the excerpt does not establish: It does not provide the full claim language, complete description, or drawing contents; nor does it set out the precise coating materials, fabrication steps, or the full definition of "cleared area." It does not establish enforceability, validity, or the accuracy of the listed assignees or legal status.

Generated 10/1/2026, 9:43:09 PM

Cases on file (0)

Specific litigation cases in our database that name US patent 3752974. The free-form analysis below may also discuss cases beyond this list.

No cases on file mention this patent. Upload a CSV or add a case manually in Admin → Manage litigation cases.

Litigation summary

Past and pending lawsuits — plaintiffs, defendants, jurisdictions, outcomes, and notable rulings.

Log in to generate
Not generated yet. Log in to request this analysis.

Proceedings on file (0)

All PTAB activity →

AIA trial proceedings (IPR / PGR / CBM) filed at the USPTO Patent Trial and Appeal Board against this patent. Sourced from the USPTO Open Data Portal and refreshed every six hours; each proceeding number deep-links to the PTAB E2E docket.

No PTAB proceedings on file. This patent has not been challenged via IPR, PGR, or CBM. The absence is itself a signal — well-asserted patents eventually attract IPRs. The LLM analysis below may surface filings the ODP feed hasn’t indexed yet.

PTAB challenges

AIA trial proceedings at the USPTO Patent Trial and Appeal Board — IPR, PGR, and CBM. Petitioners, judge panels, claim-level invalidation outcomes from Final Written Decisions, and Federal Circuit appeals. The single most important defensive datapoint after litigation history.

Log in to generate
Not generated yet. Log in to request this analysis.

Assignment history

Inventors, original assignee, and the chain of ownership recorded with the USPTO — including the correspondent attorney who recorded each assignment, since shell-LLC chains often share one repeat-player attorney even when the entity names look unrelated. Surfaces NPE / patent-troll patterns: shell-entity transfers, known asserters in the chain, repeat correspondent fingerprints, pre-litigation assignments, and bankruptcy fire-sales.

Log in to generate
Not generated yet. Log in to request this analysis.

Prior art

Earlier patents, publications, and products that may anticipate or render the claims unpatentable.

Log in to generate
Not generated yet. Log in to request this analysis.

Obviousness

Combinations of prior art that suggest the claimed invention would have been obvious under 35 U.S.C. § 103.

Log in to generate
Not generated yet. Log in to request this analysis.

Extensions

Patent term adjustments, term extensions, continuations, divisionals, family members, and expiration dates.

Log in to generate
Not generated yet. Log in to request this analysis.

Derivative works

Defensive disclosure: derivative variations of each claim designed to render future incremental improvements obvious or non-novel.

Log in to generate
Not generated yet. Log in to request this analysis.