Invalidity dossier

US 3536809

Medication method

Current assignee: Alza Corp

Added 9/24/2026, 1:18:45 AM

At a glanceNo PTAB challengesNo litigation on file

Active provider: DeepSeek · deepseek-flash

Patent summary

Title, assignee, inventors, filing/issue dates, abstract, and a plain-language overview of the claims.

✓ Generated

Patent Overview — US 3,536,809

Title: Medication method
Inventor: Norman Applezweig (New York, N.Y.)
Assignee: Alza Corporation, Palo Alto, Calif. (original assignee; Google's current-assignee data is expressly labeled an assumption)
Application: Ser. No. 799,910, filed Feb. 17, 1969; a continuation-in-part of Ser. No. 492,301, filed Oct. 1, 1965, now abandoned
Publication/grant: Oct. 27, 1970
Status as listed: Expired – Lifetime (anticipated expiration Oct. 27, 1987)
Class: A61J 7/00 (with A61J 7/0092 — holding medicines in or fixing medicines on a tooth)
Source: https://patents.google.com/patent/US3536809/en

Purpose. The patent addresses weaknesses in existing routes of getting a medicament into the bloodstream — injection (difficult, uncomfortable, skill-intensive) and oral administration (many medicaments not absorbed or degraded before reaching the blood). It also criticizes sublingual tablets (small absorptive surface, salivation, swallowing) and buccal tablets (larger doses needed, slow delivery, uncomfortable pressure between lip and gum, possible disintegration and swallowing).

Plain-language scope. A flexible, absorbent, removable and discardable non-ingested fabric, gauze or paper strip is impregnated with a medicament plus a water-soluble or dispersible carrier (e.g., Carbowax, polyvinylpyrrolidone, carboxymethyl cellulose, gum arabic). The strip is placed between the gum and cheek against the buccal membrane, releasing the medicament directly into the bloodstream through both faces; it is then removed and discarded after substantial depletion. The abstract frames this as absorption at a predetermined interval.

Examples: progesterone strips (about 26 mg, release ~2 mg/min, depleted in ~15 min); estrone strips (2 mg, ~95% removed in ~15 min); cortisol, testosterone and desoxycorticosterone strips similarly depleted (~95% in ~15 min). Hormones named: progesterone, estrone, testosterone, cortisol, desoxycorticosterone; also proteolytic enzymes, appetite depressants, antispasmodics and sedatives. Stated release range: 5–20 minutes optimal.

What the excerpt does not establish. The supplied text omits or truncates the numbered claims (only 4 claims are noted), the full claim language, and the cites of any prior-art references. It provides no evidence on validity, enforceability, claim construction, ownership transfers, or litigation outcomes. Dosage numbers are partly garbled by OCR and should not be relied on.

Generated 10/1/2026, 9:31:30 PM

Cases on file (0)

Specific litigation cases in our database that name US patent 3536809. The free-form analysis below may also discuss cases beyond this list.

No cases on file mention this patent. Upload a CSV or add a case manually in Admin → Manage litigation cases.

Litigation summary

Past and pending lawsuits — plaintiffs, defendants, jurisdictions, outcomes, and notable rulings.

Log in to generate
Not generated yet. Log in to request this analysis.

Proceedings on file (0)

All PTAB activity →

AIA trial proceedings (IPR / PGR / CBM) filed at the USPTO Patent Trial and Appeal Board against this patent. Sourced from the USPTO Open Data Portal and refreshed every six hours; each proceeding number deep-links to the PTAB E2E docket.

No PTAB proceedings on file. This patent has not been challenged via IPR, PGR, or CBM. The absence is itself a signal — well-asserted patents eventually attract IPRs. The LLM analysis below may surface filings the ODP feed hasn’t indexed yet.

PTAB challenges

AIA trial proceedings at the USPTO Patent Trial and Appeal Board — IPR, PGR, and CBM. Petitioners, judge panels, claim-level invalidation outcomes from Final Written Decisions, and Federal Circuit appeals. The single most important defensive datapoint after litigation history.

Log in to generate
Not generated yet. Log in to request this analysis.

Assignment history

Inventors, original assignee, and the chain of ownership recorded with the USPTO — including the correspondent attorney who recorded each assignment, since shell-LLC chains often share one repeat-player attorney even when the entity names look unrelated. Surfaces NPE / patent-troll patterns: shell-entity transfers, known asserters in the chain, repeat correspondent fingerprints, pre-litigation assignments, and bankruptcy fire-sales.

Log in to generate
Not generated yet. Log in to request this analysis.

Prior art

Earlier patents, publications, and products that may anticipate or render the claims unpatentable.

Log in to generate
Not generated yet. Log in to request this analysis.

Obviousness

Combinations of prior art that suggest the claimed invention would have been obvious under 35 U.S.C. § 103.

Log in to generate
Not generated yet. Log in to request this analysis.

Extensions

Patent term adjustments, term extensions, continuations, divisionals, family members, and expiration dates.

Log in to generate
Not generated yet. Log in to request this analysis.

Derivative works

Defensive disclosure: derivative variations of each claim designed to render future incremental improvements obvious or non-novel.

Log in to generate
Not generated yet. Log in to request this analysis.