Invalidity dossier
US 2512697
Method of making synthetic rubbercarbon black compositions without mastication
Current assignee: Individual
Added 9/20/2026, 5:23:53 AM
Active provider: DeepSeek · deepseek-flash
Patent summary
Title, assignee, inventors, filing/issue dates, abstract, and a plain-language overview of the claims.
Patent Overview — US 2512697 A
Title: Method of making synthetic rubber carbon black compositions without mastication
Patent number: US 2512697 A
Application number: US 527929 A
Inventor: Grotenhuis, Theodore A. Te
Original assignee / current assignee (as listed): Individual
Priority date: 1944-03-24
Filing date: 1944-03-24
Publication (grant) date: 1950-06-27
Anticipated expiration: 1967-06-27; status listed as "Expired - Lifetime"
Source: https://patents.google.com/patent/US2512697/en
Purpose (from title and indexed terms): The disclosed method makes synthetic rubber–carbon black compositions without mastication — i.e., avoiding the mechanical working step otherwise associated with incorporating carbon black into rubber. The indexed terminology centers on carbon black, emulsion, monomer, water, polymer, emulsifying agent, thickening agent, elastomer, polymerization, latex, and dispersing agent, indicating an emulsion-polymerization route in which carbon black is present in the aqueous medium during polymerization of monomers (butadiene, styrene, isoprene, and related dienes/hydrocarbons all appear in the description terms).
Plain-language scope: Rather than blending carbon black into already-formed rubber, the process appears to combine carbon black with an aqueous emulsion system containing the monomer(s), emulsifying agent, and thickening agent, so that the polymer forms in the presence of the black. This yields a polymer–black composition directly, avoiding mastication. Terms such as latex, wetting, dispersion, agglomeration, flushing procedure, and "aqueous phase" suggest the black is wetted/dispersed in water and stabilized against agglomeration during polymerization; the resulting product is described as suitable for molding, compounding, and rubber-like applications.
What this excerpt does not establish: It does not give the actual claim language, the full written description, working examples, proportions, or process conditions (temperatures, catalyst/initiator specifics, pH control). It does not establish the identity of the real party in interest, any subsequent chain of title, or the legal status as anything more than an assumption as stated on the source page. It also does not establish the validity, enforceability, or scope of any claim, nor any litigation or prior-art relationship. No claim construction should be inferred from the indexed keyword counts alone.
Generated 10/1/2026, 10:02:41 PM
Cases on file (0)
Specific litigation cases in our database that name US patent 2512697. The free-form analysis below may also discuss cases beyond this list.
No cases on file mention this patent. Upload a CSV or add a case manually in Admin → Manage litigation cases.
Litigation summary
Past and pending lawsuits — plaintiffs, defendants, jurisdictions, outcomes, and notable rulings.
Proceedings on file (0)
All PTAB activity →AIA trial proceedings (IPR / PGR / CBM) filed at the USPTO Patent Trial and Appeal Board against this patent. Sourced from the USPTO Open Data Portal and refreshed every six hours; each proceeding number deep-links to the PTAB E2E docket.
No PTAB proceedings on file. This patent has not been challenged via IPR, PGR, or CBM. The absence is itself a signal — well-asserted patents eventually attract IPRs. The LLM analysis below may surface filings the ODP feed hasn’t indexed yet.
PTAB challenges
AIA trial proceedings at the USPTO Patent Trial and Appeal Board — IPR, PGR, and CBM. Petitioners, judge panels, claim-level invalidation outcomes from Final Written Decisions, and Federal Circuit appeals. The single most important defensive datapoint after litigation history.
Assignment history
Inventors, original assignee, and the chain of ownership recorded with the USPTO — including the correspondent attorney who recorded each assignment, since shell-LLC chains often share one repeat-player attorney even when the entity names look unrelated. Surfaces NPE / patent-troll patterns: shell-entity transfers, known asserters in the chain, repeat correspondent fingerprints, pre-litigation assignments, and bankruptcy fire-sales.
Prior art
Earlier patents, publications, and products that may anticipate or render the claims unpatentable.
Obviousness
Combinations of prior art that suggest the claimed invention would have been obvious under 35 U.S.C. § 103.
Extensions
Patent term adjustments, term extensions, continuations, divisionals, family members, and expiration dates.
Derivative works
Defensive disclosure: derivative variations of each claim designed to render future incremental improvements obvious or non-novel.