Invalidity dossier

US 11995959

Added 9/23/2026, 5:25:28 PM

At a glanceNo PTAB challengesNo litigation on file

Active provider: DeepSeek · deepseek-flash

Patent summary

Title, assignee, inventors, filing/issue dates, abstract, and a plain-language overview of the claims.

✓ Generated

Patent Overview — US 11995959 B2

Title: Methods for selling pre-printed online lottery tickets

Patent number / application: US 11995959 B2; application US 17/859,338 (published as US 20220343718 A1)

Inventor / assignee: Gino Giunti; Blackhawk Network, Inc. (original and current assignee per the source listing)

Key dates: Priority date 2015-01-18; filing date 2022-07-07; granted/publication date 2024-05-28; status Active with adjusted expiration 2035-04-06. A related application (US 18/434,916; US 20240177573 A1) is noted.

Purpose: The disclosure addresses selling draw-based ("online") lottery tickets through a retailer's point of sale (POS) without specialized lottery hardware — terminals, ticket printers, or customized devices — so tickets can be bought in a normal checkout lane, including multi-lane grocery and big-box stores, rather than at a separate lottery counter. It notes that receipt paper is typically low quality and tickets printed on it may deteriorate in sunlight or water.

Plain-language scope: Pre-printed lottery tickets are manufactured and distributed without an assigned draw date or wager (lottery numbers). Each carries a unique bar code identifying the ticket and a UPC identifying the lottery product (one bar code may hold both). Until purchased and activated, the tickets have no value and cannot be used for validation or redemption. Once scanned at the retailer's POS and paid for, the lottery system generates wagers, assigns the next available draw date, and prints the generated numbers, draw date, and unique ticket identifier on the customer's shopping receipt. The pre-printed ticket — not the receipt — is the legal instrument for validation and prize redemption; receipt information confirms activation and assignment. Communication between POS and lottery system may be facilitated by a transaction processor. A variation uses pre-printed tickets bearing pre-printed wagers, in which case the lottery system assigns the next draw date and activates the ticket from a database of pre-printed tickets and associated wagers. FIGS. 1–9 depict tickets, system components, and related processes.

Source: https://patents.google.com/patent/US11995959/en

What the excerpt does not establish: The supplied text is partial (it ends mid-sentence and omits the claims and full description). It therefore does not establish the actual claim scope, the number or wording of claims, dependencies, or specific limitations. It also does not establish embodiments beyond those summarized, any measured results, or the content of the listed figures.

Generated 10/1/2026, 9:43:37 PM

Cases on file (0)

Specific litigation cases in our database that name US patent 11995959. The free-form analysis below may also discuss cases beyond this list.

No cases on file mention this patent. Upload a CSV or add a case manually in Admin → Manage litigation cases.

Litigation summary

Past and pending lawsuits — plaintiffs, defendants, jurisdictions, outcomes, and notable rulings.

Log in to generate
Not generated yet. Log in to request this analysis.

Proceedings on file (0)

All PTAB activity →

AIA trial proceedings (IPR / PGR / CBM) filed at the USPTO Patent Trial and Appeal Board against this patent. Sourced from the USPTO Open Data Portal and refreshed every six hours; each proceeding number deep-links to the PTAB E2E docket.

No PTAB proceedings on file. This patent has not been challenged via IPR, PGR, or CBM. The absence is itself a signal — well-asserted patents eventually attract IPRs. The LLM analysis below may surface filings the ODP feed hasn’t indexed yet.

PTAB challenges

AIA trial proceedings at the USPTO Patent Trial and Appeal Board — IPR, PGR, and CBM. Petitioners, judge panels, claim-level invalidation outcomes from Final Written Decisions, and Federal Circuit appeals. The single most important defensive datapoint after litigation history.

Log in to generate
Not generated yet. Log in to request this analysis.

Assignment history

Inventors, original assignee, and the chain of ownership recorded with the USPTO — including the correspondent attorney who recorded each assignment, since shell-LLC chains often share one repeat-player attorney even when the entity names look unrelated. Surfaces NPE / patent-troll patterns: shell-entity transfers, known asserters in the chain, repeat correspondent fingerprints, pre-litigation assignments, and bankruptcy fire-sales.

Log in to generate
Not generated yet. Log in to request this analysis.

Prior art

Earlier patents, publications, and products that may anticipate or render the claims unpatentable.

Log in to generate
Not generated yet. Log in to request this analysis.

Obviousness

Combinations of prior art that suggest the claimed invention would have been obvious under 35 U.S.C. § 103.

Log in to generate
Not generated yet. Log in to request this analysis.

Extensions

Patent term adjustments, term extensions, continuations, divisionals, family members, and expiration dates.

Log in to generate
Not generated yet. Log in to request this analysis.

Derivative works

Defensive disclosure: derivative variations of each claim designed to render future incremental improvements obvious or non-novel.

Log in to generate
Not generated yet. Log in to request this analysis.