- Filed
- Oct 16, 2026
- Last modified
- Oct 16, 2026
- Petitioner
- Netskope, Inc.
- Inventor
- Emilio Borbolla Galindo
Invalidity dossier
US 11916902
Systems and methods for using a network access device to secure a network prior to requesting access to the network by the network access device
Current assignee: Fortinet Inc
Added 10/17/2026, 12:00:16 AM
Active provider: DeepSeek · deepseek-flash
Patent summary
Title, assignee, inventors, filing/issue dates, abstract, and a plain-language overview of the claims.
Patent Overview: US 11916902 B2
Title: "Systems and methods for using a network access device to secure a network prior to requesting access to the network by the network access device"
Patent number: US11916902B2 | Application number: US17/185,542 | Publication: US20220272086A1
Inventor: Emilio Borbolla Galindo | Assignee: Fortinet, Inc.
Key dates: Priority/filing date: 2021-02-25. Granted/publication date: 2024-02-27. Legal status listed as Active with an adjusted expiration of 2041-03-31. A later priority claim (2023-12-26) to US18/396,393 (US12225007B2) is noted.
Purpose and plain-language scope: The supplied excerpt frames the invention as securing networks against access from off-network devices. Specifically, embodiments "relate to systems and methods for identifying potential threats included in a remote network by a network access device prior to requesting access to a known secure network via the remote network." The scenario described: a secure corporate device is taken outside the secure corporate network and used to reach it through a remote (e.g., home) network that the network administrator does not control, potentially containing unsecured devices — including IoT devices like televisions, cameras, and microphones. The disclosure defines "known network"/"on-network" as a network controlled and secured by a responsible entity (e.g., a corporate network protected by a network security appliance, such as FORTIGATE), and "remote network"/"off-network" as one with elements not known to, governed by, or controlled by that entity. A "known access device" is defined as a device with a module governing access to a known network via a remote network. The figures describe methods for determining potential network security issues and then either denying access based on detected insecurity (FIG. 2) or attempting to mitigate it (FIGS. 3–6). Classification includes H04L63/0876 (identity based on terminal/device fingerprint) and H04L63/1433 (vulnerability analysis).
Source: https://patents.google.com/patent/US11916902/en
What the excerpt does not establish: It provides no actual claims, no detailed technical implementation of scanning or mitigation, no complete figure descriptions, and no prior-art references. It gives no information on litigation, ownership transfers, validity, or claim scope.
Generated 10/17/2026, 12:00:47 AM
Cases on file (0)
Specific litigation cases in our database that name US patent 11916902. The free-form analysis below may also discuss cases beyond this list.
No cases on file mention this patent. Upload a CSV or add a case manually in Admin → Manage litigation cases.
Litigation summary
Past and pending lawsuits — plaintiffs, defendants, jurisdictions, outcomes, and notable rulings.
Proceedings on file (1)
All PTAB activity →AIA trial proceedings (IPR / PGR / CBM) filed at the USPTO Patent Trial and Appeal Board against this patent. Sourced from the USPTO Open Data Portal and refreshed every six hours; each proceeding number deep-links to the PTAB E2E docket.
PTAB challenges
AIA trial proceedings at the USPTO Patent Trial and Appeal Board — IPR, PGR, and CBM. Petitioners, judge panels, claim-level invalidation outcomes from Final Written Decisions, and Federal Circuit appeals. The single most important defensive datapoint after litigation history.
Assignment history
Inventors, original assignee, and the chain of ownership recorded with the USPTO — including the correspondent attorney who recorded each assignment, since shell-LLC chains often share one repeat-player attorney even when the entity names look unrelated. Surfaces NPE / patent-troll patterns: shell-entity transfers, known asserters in the chain, repeat correspondent fingerprints, pre-litigation assignments, and bankruptcy fire-sales.
Prior art
Earlier patents, publications, and products that may anticipate or render the claims unpatentable.
Obviousness
Combinations of prior art that suggest the claimed invention would have been obvious under 35 U.S.C. § 103.
Extensions
Patent term adjustments, term extensions, continuations, divisionals, family members, and expiration dates.
Derivative works
Defensive disclosure: derivative variations of each claim designed to render future incremental improvements obvious or non-novel.