Invalidity dossier
US 11393279
System for implementing enhanced gaming and prizing parameters in an electronic environment
Current assignee: Milestone Entertainment LLC
Added 10/15/2026, 12:01:49 AM
Active provider: DeepSeek · deepseek-flash
Patent summary
Title, assignee, inventors, filing/issue dates, abstract, and a plain-language overview of the claims.
Patent Overview — US11393279B2
Title: System for implementing enhanced gaming and prizing parameters in an electronic environment
Patent number: US11393279B2. Application number: US17/525,238. Other version: US20220076525A1.
Inventors: Randall M. Katz; Gary Dawson.
Assignee: Milestone Entertainment LLC (current and original assignee, per the listing).
Key dates (as listed, with the source's own caveats): Prior art date 2003-09-02; filing date 2021-11-12; publication date 2022-07-19. Priority date is stated as 2003-09-02 but expressly described as an assumption, not a legal conclusion. The source also lists an anticipated expiration of 2023-09-02 and a legal status of "Expired - Lifetime."
Purpose (from the supplied text): The definitions state these inventions relate to methods, systems and apparatus for "unique player participation games," and to improved methods of play for games of chance and skill. More particularly, they concern games involving player participation in a broadcast medium such as television, and in other communication media such as the Internet, mobile phones, or other communications networks and devices.
Plain-language scope (from the supplied text): The material describes player participation games falling into games of chance and games of skill. It notes that one main form of games of chance is lotteries, defined by three elements — prize, chance, and consideration — and typically run by a governmental entity, often state-run in the U.S. or nationally elsewhere. It notes that countries and states attempt to limit game play to geographic boundaries. Games may be live and in person, broadcast over radio or television, or played via active communication media such as telephone or the Internet. The text references U.S. Pat. No. 5,800,268 ("Method of Participating in a Live Casino Game from a Remote Location") as having been asserted in litigation, with its disclosure beginning to be described before the excerpt cuts off.
Source: https://patents.google.com/patent/[US11393279](/patent/US11393279)/en
What the excerpt does not establish: The claims are not reproduced here, so the actual claimed scope is unknown — the excerpt contains only bibliographic data, classifications, and a definitions section. The full description and any listed prior-art references are truncated. The filing-date, priority-date, expiration, and legal-status entries are expressly flagged as assumptions or non-legal conclusions. Nothing here establishes validity, enforceability, claim coverage, or the merits of any proceeding.
Generated 10/15/2026, 12:10:50 AM
Cases on file (0)
Specific litigation cases in our database that name US patent 11393279. The free-form analysis below may also discuss cases beyond this list.
No cases on file mention this patent. Upload a CSV or add a case manually in Admin → Manage litigation cases.
Litigation summary
Past and pending lawsuits — plaintiffs, defendants, jurisdictions, outcomes, and notable rulings.
Proceedings on file (0)
All PTAB activity →AIA trial proceedings (IPR / PGR / CBM) filed at the USPTO Patent Trial and Appeal Board against this patent. Sourced from the USPTO Open Data Portal and refreshed every six hours; each proceeding number deep-links to the PTAB E2E docket.
No PTAB proceedings on file. This patent has not been challenged via IPR, PGR, or CBM. The absence is itself a signal — well-asserted patents eventually attract IPRs. The LLM analysis below may surface filings the ODP feed hasn’t indexed yet.
PTAB challenges
AIA trial proceedings at the USPTO Patent Trial and Appeal Board — IPR, PGR, and CBM. Petitioners, judge panels, claim-level invalidation outcomes from Final Written Decisions, and Federal Circuit appeals. The single most important defensive datapoint after litigation history.
Assignment history
Inventors, original assignee, and the chain of ownership recorded with the USPTO — including the correspondent attorney who recorded each assignment, since shell-LLC chains often share one repeat-player attorney even when the entity names look unrelated. Surfaces NPE / patent-troll patterns: shell-entity transfers, known asserters in the chain, repeat correspondent fingerprints, pre-litigation assignments, and bankruptcy fire-sales.
Prior art
Earlier patents, publications, and products that may anticipate or render the claims unpatentable.
Obviousness
Combinations of prior art that suggest the claimed invention would have been obvious under 35 U.S.C. § 103.
Extensions
Patent term adjustments, term extensions, continuations, divisionals, family members, and expiration dates.
Derivative works
Defensive disclosure: derivative variations of each claim designed to render future incremental improvements obvious or non-novel.