Invalidity dossier

US 11133758

Quantum vacuum fluctuation devices

Current assignee: University of Colorado Colorado Springs

Added 9/21/2026, 10:30:16 AM

At a glanceNo PTAB challengesNo litigation on file

Active provider: DeepSeek · deepseek-flash

Patent summary

Title, assignee, inventors, filing/issue dates, abstract, and a plain-language overview of the claims.

✓ Generated

Patent Overview — US11133758B2

Title: Quantum vacuum fluctuation devices

Assignee/Applicant: University of Colorado Colorado Springs (original assignee). The record also lists an assignment to Radanta Corporation (2020-07-22) and a subsequent assignment to The Regents of the University of Colorado (2020-09-24). Google states listed assignees "may be inaccurate."

Key dates: Priority date 2019-05-10; filing date 2020-04-22; publication date 2021-09-28; anticipated expiration 2040-04-22. Legal status listed as Active (an assumption, not a legal conclusion).

Inventor: Garret Moddel

Application number: US16/855,890

Purpose: The patent describes electronic devices for harvesting and generating electrical energy said to arise from quantum vacuum fluctuations. The premise stated is that quantum vacuum energy is geometry-dependent, having lower density inside a Casimir cavity than outside, creating an asymmetry that can drive energy or charge carriers across a device. The disclosed devices are described as producing power in both dark and illuminated conditions, distinguishing them from solar cells and photodiodes.

Plain-language scope: An example device has an electronic device adjoining a "zero-point-energy-density-reducing structure" — e.g., a Casimir cavity with first reflective layer, cavity layer, second reflective layer. The electronic device may include a first conductive layer (metal, semiconductor, 2D material, superconductor, or conductive ceramic) adjoining or forming part of the cavity; a transport layer (dielectric or semiconductor) in contact with it; and a second conductive layer. Diode forms are listed (MIM, Schottky, MIS, Mott, quantum well, ballistic, carbon nanotube, SIS). Structures are described as permitting carrier transport or capture in 1 ps or less (optionally 100 fs, 10 fs, 1 fs, or 0.1 fs or less), with components optionally 100 nm or thinner. Cavity layers may be evacuated, gas-filled, or condensed-phase (solid, liquid, liquid crystal), optionally 10 nm–2 µm thick; reflective layers at least 10 nm. Devices may be arrayed in series and/or parallel, or stacked. An optional load may connect to conductive layers to receive current.

Classification: H02N11/00 and H02N11/008 ("Alleged electric or magnetic perpetua mobilia"), among others.

What the excerpt does not establish: It does not confirm experimental power generation, efficiency, or device performance; does not resolve the ownership-transfers question (Google cautions its assignee list may be inaccurate); and does not address validity, enforceability, litigation, or prior art beyond the class listing. The source text is an excerpt; omitted portions are not represented here.

Source: https://patents.google.com/patent/[US11133758](/patent/US11133758)/en

Generated 10/1/2026, 10:01:38 PM

Cases on file (0)

Specific litigation cases in our database that name US patent 11133758. The free-form analysis below may also discuss cases beyond this list.

No cases on file mention this patent. Upload a CSV or add a case manually in Admin → Manage litigation cases.

Litigation summary

Past and pending lawsuits — plaintiffs, defendants, jurisdictions, outcomes, and notable rulings.

Log in to generate
Not generated yet. Log in to request this analysis.

Proceedings on file (0)

All PTAB activity →

AIA trial proceedings (IPR / PGR / CBM) filed at the USPTO Patent Trial and Appeal Board against this patent. Sourced from the USPTO Open Data Portal and refreshed every six hours; each proceeding number deep-links to the PTAB E2E docket.

No PTAB proceedings on file. This patent has not been challenged via IPR, PGR, or CBM. The absence is itself a signal — well-asserted patents eventually attract IPRs. The LLM analysis below may surface filings the ODP feed hasn’t indexed yet.

PTAB challenges

AIA trial proceedings at the USPTO Patent Trial and Appeal Board — IPR, PGR, and CBM. Petitioners, judge panels, claim-level invalidation outcomes from Final Written Decisions, and Federal Circuit appeals. The single most important defensive datapoint after litigation history.

Log in to generate
Not generated yet. Log in to request this analysis.

Assignment history

Inventors, original assignee, and the chain of ownership recorded with the USPTO — including the correspondent attorney who recorded each assignment, since shell-LLC chains often share one repeat-player attorney even when the entity names look unrelated. Surfaces NPE / patent-troll patterns: shell-entity transfers, known asserters in the chain, repeat correspondent fingerprints, pre-litigation assignments, and bankruptcy fire-sales.

Log in to generate
Not generated yet. Log in to request this analysis.

Prior art

Earlier patents, publications, and products that may anticipate or render the claims unpatentable.

Log in to generate
Not generated yet. Log in to request this analysis.

Obviousness

Combinations of prior art that suggest the claimed invention would have been obvious under 35 U.S.C. § 103.

Log in to generate
Not generated yet. Log in to request this analysis.

Extensions

Patent term adjustments, term extensions, continuations, divisionals, family members, and expiration dates.

Log in to generate
Not generated yet. Log in to request this analysis.

Derivative works

Defensive disclosure: derivative variations of each claim designed to render future incremental improvements obvious or non-novel.

Log in to generate
Not generated yet. Log in to request this analysis.