US 11120902

Here's a concise summary of US Patent 11120902, based on the provided authoritative patent text:

US Patent: 11120902

• Title: System and method for providing a person with live training data of an athlete as the athlete is performing a cycling workout
• Assignee: Finish Time Holdings LLC
• Inventor: Todd Martin
• Filing Date: 2021-05-19
• Issue Date: 2021-09-14
• Abstract: An athlete tracking system and method for tracking an athlete during training sessions. The system includes a mobile tracking device wearable around a portion of the athlete's head, and a training log server for maintaining an athlete profile that includes a training record updatable by the athlete and a training plan supplied by a coach.

Plain-Language Overview of Independent Claims:

The patent text provided does not explicitly delineate the claims, but rather provides a detailed description of various preferred aspects, systems, and methods. In the absence of a distinct "Claims" section within the provided text, I will summarize the main inventive concepts presented as independent aspects.

The document describes several preferred aspects that could be considered independent claims if formally structured:

1. A Web-Based Platform for Personalizing Athlete Training: This platform includes a training log server that manages multiple athlete profiles. Each profile contains a training record with fields for workout aspects like distance and time. A processor receives workout data from the athlete to update this record. The system allows the athlete to grant a coach access to their training record and enables the coach to upload training plans to the athlete's profile for the athlete to view.
2. A Method for Personalizing Athlete Training Regimens: This method involves creating athlete profiles on a web-based platform, each with a training record including fields for workout distance and time. The platform receives workout data (distance and time) from the athlete, updates their training record, allows a coach to view the athlete's profile, and enables the coach to upload a training plan to the athlete's profile.
3. A System for Transferring Athlete Training Data from a Bike Computer: This system comprises a bike computer (mountable on a bike, storing training data, and having a wireless transceiver for peer-to-peer communication), a mobile communications device (with a processor and wireless transceiver to receive and format data from the bike computer for transfer to an online training log), and a web-based platform (with a processor to receive and store this formatted training data in a training log server, which holds athlete profiles).
4. A Method for Updating an Online Training Log: This method involves establishing a peer-to-peer communication link between a mobile training computer (bike-mounted) and a mobile communications device. Training data is transferred from the mobile training computer to the mobile communications device via this link, formatted, and then uploaded to a web-based platform to update the user's online training log.
5. A Bike Computer for Collecting and Transmitting Training Data: This bike computer includes at least one sensor for measuring training session parameters, a processor to collect this data, memory to store it, and wireless communication means to transmit the data to a training log.

CAFC 2026 Dockets:

A search of CAFC 2026 dockets for patent number 11120902 did not return any specific litigation or case filings related to this patent number. The search results show general intellectual property and patent infringement cases, as well as news about CAFC decisions, but none directly name US Patent 11120902. Therefore, as of April 26, 2026, there is no authoritative information found regarding litigation for this specific patent in the CAFC 2026 dockets.

I'll search litigation databases for US Patent 11120902.

Let me investigate these cases further to determine which patents are actually asserted.

Let me check the Unified Patents litigation caselist and additional Finish Time filings.

Litigation Involving US Patent 11,120,902

Bottom line

Yes — US 11,120,902 ("the '902 Patent") is currently asserted in one active district court case.

Direct evidence the '902 Patent is in this case — the complaint's exhibit list includes "Exhibit 8 - US Patent 11,120,902," "Exhibit 21 - US Patent 11,120,902 File History," and "Exhibit 35 - Claim Chart re US Patent 11,120,902." The complaint also identifies it by number and title: "On September 14, 2021, U.S. Patent No. 11,120,902 (the '902 Patent') was duly and legally issued by the USPTO for an invention entitled 'System and method for providing a person with live training data of an athlete as the athlete is performing a cycling workout.'"

Sources: CourtListener docket 74658372 (Finish Time Holdings, LLC v. Strava, Inc.) · PACER Monitor case 66288869 · complaint PDF via Internet Archive · IP Verse case page

Related Finish Time Holdings cases that do NOT involve the '902 Patent

These are in the same patent family but assert other patents, not the '902 Patent. I list them only to prevent misattribution:

The '902 Patent issued 2021-09-14 — after the 2020 Garmin suits were filed — so it could not have been asserted there. Note the '902 Patent's Google Patents page carries the "Family has litigation" flag and a Darts-IP family link (family 50486056), consistent with the family-level litigation being the Finish Time/Garmin and Finish Time/Strava matters.

CAFC / PTAB

• No CAFC appeal involving the '902 Patent was found. The Strava case is at the pleading/scheduling stage, so no appealable judgment exists.
• No PTAB proceeding (IPR/PGR/CBM) involving the '902 Patent was found, consistent with the previously generated PTAB section of this analysis.
• Note: Strava, Inc. v. Garmin Ltd. et al., D. Colo. 1:25-cv-03074 (filed 2025-09-30, Strava's own route-segment patents) was voluntarily dismissed without prejudice on 2025-10-21 and is unrelated to the '902 Patent. It is relevant only as context — Finish Time attached Strava's Garmin complaint as Exhibit 27 in the Strava case.

Two flags / caveats

1. Date inconsistency (explicit flag). The task states the current date is April 26, 2026, but the search results returned a case filed 2026-08-17 with docket entries dated 2026-08-18. Per the operating rule to prefer live search results over training data, I have reported the filings as they appear. If the April 26, 2026 date is correct and authoritative, then the Strava case would not yet have been filed and there would be no known litigation against the '902 Patent. This is a genuine conflict I cannot resolve from the available material.
2. Contradiction with a prior section (explicit flag). The previously generated "Patent summary" section states: "A search of CAFC 2026 dockets for patent number 11120902 did not return any specific litigation or case filings related to this patent number." That statement is not contradicted strictly (the Strava case is a district court matter, not a CAFC docket) and remains correct as to the CAFC. However, the "Prior art" section's implication that no litigation had been identified should be updated: there is now (as of the search results) an active D. Colo. infringement action in which the '902 Patent is one of 13 asserted patents.

What I could not confirm

• Whether Finish Time has asserted the '902 Patent against any other defendant (e.g., Zwift, Wahoo, Peloton, Garmin post-issuance). Searches for the '902 Patent number returned no such cases.
• The final disposition of the Garmin matters, and whether any of them were consolidated, transferred, or settled.
• Any damages, injunction, or claim construction developments in the Strava case — the case is too early (no answer deadline event or scheduling order on the docket as retrieved).

Proceedings overview

As of 2026-08-18, there is no PTAB activity on file for US Patent 11120902. The USPTO Open Data Portal (ODP) API returns no AIA trial proceedings for this patent, and web searches for IPR, PGR, or CBM proceedings related to US11120902 did not yield any results. This indicates that the patent has not yet been challenged in an AIA trial before the PTAB.

Strategic summary

Currently, all claims of US11120902 remain untested by any AIA trial proceedings (IPR, PGR, or CBM). This means that for a defendant facing assertion of this patent, all prior art grounds, including those that could have been raised in an IPR or PGR, are theoretically still available for a future PTAB challenge or district court litigation defense.

The absence of PTAB activity suggests that either the patent has not yet been widely asserted, or any assertions have not prompted third parties to challenge its validity at the PTAB. This can be a signal that the patent owner has not been aggressive in enforcement, or that potential challengers have not identified sufficiently strong prior art to warrant the cost of an AIA trial, or that the patent has not come to the attention of defensive aggregators like Unified Patents.

Recommended next steps

Since no PTAB activity exists for US11120902, a defendant facing assertion of this patent should consider the following:

• Prior Art Search: Conduct a thorough prior art search to identify any relevant references that could form the basis of an IPR or PGR petition.
• Validity Analysis: Perform a detailed validity analysis of the claims of US11120902 against any identified prior art to assess the likelihood of success in an AIA trial.
• Monitor for Future Filings: Regularly monitor the USPTO PTAB E2E (or its successor, P-TACTS) for any newly filed petitions against US11120902. The PTAB E2E system allows users to search for AIA reviews by patent number.

Inventors

• Todd Martin (Finish Time Holdings LLC)

Original assignee

The original assignee is Finish Time Holdings LLC. Based on the patent title, "System and method for providing a person with live training data of an athlete as the athlete is performing a cycling workout," their primary line of business appears to be related to sports technology, particularly systems for tracking and managing athlete training data. Without further information beyond the provided patent text, it is unclear whether Finish Time Holdings LLC currently ships a product embodying the claims, their current operating status (operating, acquired, dissolved, in bankruptcy).

Assignment timeline

A search on the USPTO Assignment Center for patent number US11120902B1 yielded no recorded assignments. This typically indicates that the original assignee, Finish Time Holdings LLC, still retains ownership of the patent.

Timeline diagram

timeline
    title Ownership of US 11120902
    2021 : Filed by Finish Time Holdings LLC
    2021 : Issued to Finish Time Holdings LLC

NPE / troll-pattern signals

1. Shell-entity transfer — not present. There are no recorded transfers from an operating assignee to a licensing-only LLC.
2. Known asserter in the chain — not present. No known NPEs are listed as current or prior assignees.
3. Repeat correspondent across the chain — not present. There are no recorded assignments, so no correspondent recurrence can be observed.
4. Cascading transfers — not present. There are no recorded assignments to show multiple consecutive transfers.
5. Pre-litigation transfer — not present. There are no recorded assignments, and no litigation has been identified in the CAFC 2026 dockets.
6. Bankruptcy fire-sale — unclear. There is no information to indicate the original assignee has filed for bankruptcy.
7. Privateering — not present. No evidence suggests a transfer to an NPE for assertion on an operating company's behalf.
8. Defensive aggregator (anti-NPE) — not present. The patent has not been acquired by a defensive aggregator.

Verdict

Insufficient data. There are no recorded assignments for US11120902B1 on the USPTO Assignment Center. This means the patent appears to still be held by the original assignee, Finish Time Holdings LLC, and there is no information available to assess any NPE or troll-pattern signals.
Search link: https://assignmentcenter.uspto.gov/

To identify the most relevant prior art for US patent 11120902, I will use the USPTO database as requested. The USPTO's Patent Public Search is an appropriate tool for this purpose. I will then examine the cited prior art within the patent document itself to determine relevance and potential anticipation under 35 U.S.C. § 102.

Based on the provided patent text, US Patent 11120902 explicitly incorporates by reference two prior art documents. These are key starting points for prior art analysis.

Here's the most relevant prior art explicitly cited within US Patent 11120902:

1. U.S. application Ser. No. 13/484,213:

   • Full Citation: U.S. application Ser. No. 13/484,213, filed May 30, 2012.
   • Publication/Filing Date: May 30, 2012.
   • Brief Description: This application is titled "System and Method for Providing an Athlete with a Performance Profile." The present patent (US11120902) refers to it for "Details of a preferred rankings generator" and "Details of a preferred medial portal."
   • Potential Anticipation (35 U.S.C. § 102):
     • Claim 1 (Web-Based Platform): The description of a "rankings generator" and "media portal" within the web-based platform of US11120902 (as summarized in point 1 of the patent summary) is explicitly linked to the details found in this prior application. Therefore, aspects of the platform related to rankings generation and media portals in US11120902 could potentially be anticipated by this earlier filing.
     • Claim 2 (Method for Personalizing Training): While Claim 2 focuses on the core training log and plan, if the method were to involve interacting with ranking or media features of the platform, those specific interactions might be anticipated.

2. U.S. Provisional Application No. 61/705,232:

   • Full Citation: U.S. Provisional Application No. 61/705,232, filed Sep. 25, 2012.
   • Publication/Filing Date: September 25, 2012.
   • Brief Description: This application is titled "Interface and Method for Updating an Athlete Training Log." US11120902 refers to it as "An example of a system for providing a live feed to a training log."
   • Potential Anticipation (35 U.S.C. § 102):
     • Claim 1 (Web-Based Platform): The concept of a "live data feed provided by the tracking device... to monitor an athlete's performance during a competition and provide the coach with live data on the progress of the athlete during the competition" is described in US11120902, and explicitly states this provisional application describes "An example of a system for providing a live feed to a training log." This strongly suggests anticipation of the live training data aspect of the web-based platform.
     • Claim 3 (System for Transferring Data from Bike Computer) and Claim 4 (Method for Updating Online Training Log): While the provisional application title focuses on updating an athlete training log, the mention of a "live feed" directly impacts the ability to transfer and update training data. If the provisional application details a system and method for live data transfer from a tracking device (which could encompass a bike computer or similar mobile training computer), then elements of claims 3 and 4 related to live or automatic data transfer and updating of the training log could be anticipated.

It is important to note that the patent text for US11120902 also lists a long chain of continuation applications (e.g., U.S. application Ser. No. 17/174,619, U.S. application Ser. No. 17/023,913, etc.), but these are continuations of the same inventive concept and therefore generally do not constitute prior art against US11120902 in the same way earlier, distinct filings would under 35 U.S.C. § 102. The earliest priority date mentioned in this chain is from U.S. Provisional Application No. 61/715,847, filed Oct. 19, 2012, which also serves as a foundational date for the patent's claims.

Obviousness Analysis of US Patent 11120902 under 35 U.S.C. § 103

This analysis assesses the obviousness of the inventive concepts disclosed in US Patent 11120902, treating the "Plain-Language Overview of Independent Claims" from the patent summary as the claims for this purpose, given the absence of explicitly delineated claims in the provided patent text. The prior art considered includes documents incorporated by reference within the patent itself, as their filing dates precede the priority date of US11120902B1 (October 19, 2012). A person having ordinary skill in the art (POSITA) in 2012 would have been familiar with web-based platforms, mobile communication technologies (e.g., Bluetooth, Wi-Fi), and athletic training devices and methodologies.

Referenced Prior Art Documents:

1. U.S. application Ser. No. 13/484,213 (filed May 30, 2012): Titled “System and Method for Providing an Athlete with a Performance Profile.” This document discloses a web-based platform for athlete performance data, including a rankings generator and a media portal. [cite: The patent text states, "Details of a preferred rankings generator are found in U.S. application Ser. No. 13/484,213, filed May 30, 2012, entitled “System and Method for Providing an Athlete with a Performance Profile,” the entire disclosure of which is incorporated by reference herein." and "Details of a preferred medial portal are found in U.S. application Ser. No. 13/484,213."]
2. U.S. Provisional Application No. 61/705,232 (filed Sep. 25, 2012): Titled “Interface and Method for Updating an Athlete Training Log.” This document describes a system for providing a live feed to a training log and methods for updating an athlete's training log. [cite: The patent text mentions, "An example of a system for providing a live feed to a training log is described in U.S. Provisional Application No. 61/705,232, filed Sep. 25, 2012, entitled “Interface and Method for Updating an Athlete Training Log,” the entire disclosure of which is incorporated by reference herein."]

Analysis of Obviousness for Each Claim Aspect:

1. A Web-Based Platform for Personalizing Athlete Training

• Claim Elements: A web-based platform with a training log server maintaining athlete profiles (including training records with distance and time fields), a processor to receive and update workout data from the athlete, and the ability for an athlete to grant a coach access to their training record and for the coach to upload training plans.
• Combination of Prior Art: U.S. application Ser. No. 13/484,213 in combination with general knowledge of web-based training logs and the common desire for remote coaching solutions.
• Obviousness Argument: U.S. application Ser. No. 13/484,213 already teaches a "web-based platform" for "providing an athlete with a performance profile." [cite: The patent text refers to U.S. application Ser. No. 13/484,213 as providing a "System and Method for Providing an Athlete with a Performance Profile."] At the time of the invention (priority date 2012-10-19), online training logs allowing athletes to record workout data (including distance and time) were known in the art, even if manual entry was common. The background of US11120902 explicitly states that athletes "usually enlist the assistance of a coach" and that the invention "seeks to provide an athlete with the ability to maintain their current relationship with a preferred coach regardless of their physical location." This highlights a recognized need for remote coaching. A POSITA would have been motivated to combine the existing concept of an athlete performance profile platform (as in US 13/484,213) with a training log feature to make the profile more comprehensive. Furthermore, it would have been obvious to a POSITA to enable coach access to these training records and to allow coaches to upload training plans to address the known problem of remote coaching and to enhance the utility of such a platform. The "training log server configured to maintain a plurality athlete profiles" is a logical extension of a platform managing athlete performance profiles.

2. A Method for Personalizing Athlete Training Regimens

• Claim Elements: Creating athlete profiles with training records (distance/time fields), receiving workout data (distance/time) from the athlete, updating the training record, permitting a coach to view the profile, and uploading a training plan from the coach to the athlete's profile.
• Combination of Prior Art: U.S. application Ser. No. 13/484,213, U.S. Provisional Application No. 61/705,232, and general knowledge of web-based training.
• Obviousness Argument: This method corresponds to the system described in the first claim aspect. U.S. Provisional Application No. 61/705,232 specifically discloses an "Interface and Method for Updating an Athlete Training Log." [cite: The patent text refers to U.S. Provisional Application No. 61/705,232 as providing an "Interface and Method for Updating an Athlete Training Log."] Combining the method of updating a training log (from 61/705,232) with the profile management capabilities of a platform for providing an athlete with a performance profile (from 13/484,213) would be an obvious step for a POSITA to create a comprehensive remote training regimen. The steps of creating profiles, receiving/updating workout data, and enabling coach interaction (viewing, uploading plans) are the natural methodological implementation of such a combined system, driven by the motivation to provide personalized, coach-supervised training regardless of physical location. The additional method steps of cumulatively tracking, generating calendars, sending messages, and comparing planned vs. actual workouts are all routine enhancements for digital training management systems known in the art.

3. A System for Transferring Athlete Training Data from a Bike Computer

• Claim Elements: A bike computer (mountable, stores data, wireless transceiver for peer-to-peer communication), a mobile communications device (processor, wireless transceiver, receives and formats data from the bike computer), and a web-based platform (processor, receives and stores formatted data in a training log server with athlete profiles).
• Combination of Prior Art: U.S. Provisional Application No. 61/705,232 in combination with existing wireless bike computers and widespread use of smartphones as data hubs by 2012.
• Obviousness Argument: U.S. Provisional Application No. 61/705,232 describes "a system for providing a live feed to a training log," inherently contemplating the transfer of data from a device to an online log. [cite: The patent text mentions, "An example of a system for providing a live feed to a training log is described in U.S. Provisional Application No. 61/705,232, filed Sep. 25, 2012, entitled “Interface and Method for Updating an Athlete Training Log,” the entire disclosure of which is incorporated by reference herein."] By 2012, bike computers with integrated GPS, speed, cadence, and heart rate sensors were commercially available from various manufacturers (e.g., Garmin, Polar, CatEye). These devices commonly included wireless transceivers (e.g., ANT+, Bluetooth) for communicating with sensors or transferring data to a computer. Smartphones and tablets, equipped with Bluetooth and Wi-Fi capabilities, were widely adopted and frequently functioned as intermediaries to collect data from fitness devices and upload it to web-based platforms. A POSITA would have been motivated to combine these known elements (wireless bike computer, mobile communication device, web-based training log) to automate the transfer of training data, improving convenience and accuracy over manual data entry, thereby enhancing the training log concepts of 61/705,232. The use of peer-to-peer communication protocols like Bluetooth or Wi-Fi Direct (explicitly mentioned in the patent) was a common and obvious engineering choice for direct device-to-device communication in 2012.

4. A Method for Updating an Online Training Log

• Claim Elements: Establishing a peer-to-peer communication link between a mobile training computer (bike-mounted) and a mobile communications device, transferring training data, formatting the data for transfer to a web-based platform, and uploading the formatted data to the web-based platform.
• Combination of Prior Art: U.S. Provisional Application No. 61/705,232 in combination with known methods of peer-to-peer wireless data transfer via mobile devices.
• Obviousness Argument: This method is the counterpart to the system described in the third claim aspect. U.S. Provisional Application No. 61/705,232 teaches a "Method for Updating an Athlete Training Log." [cite: The patent text refers to U.S. Provisional Application No. 61/705,232 as providing an "Interface and Method for Updating an Athlete Training Log."] The specific steps of establishing a peer-to-peer link between a mobile training computer (e.g., a bike computer) and a mobile communications device, transferring data, formatting, and uploading to a web-based platform, would have been an obvious method for a POSITA to implement an automated or streamlined data update process for an online training log. Peer-to-peer wireless technologies like Bluetooth and Wi-Fi Direct were well-established by 2012 for connecting devices to smartphones and facilitating data transfer, and their application to fitness data would have been a matter of routine implementation for a POSITA seeking to reduce manual data entry and enhance the user experience of an online training log. The patent itself notes that training data "may be uploaded to the online training log without a USB interface," indicating a known desire to simplify data transfer. [cite: The patent text mentions that "the training data may be uploaded to the online training log without a USB interface."]

5. A Bike Computer for Collecting and Transmitting Training Data

• Claim Elements: A bike computer including at least one sensor for measuring training session parameters, a processor to collect this data, memory to store it, and wireless communications means for transmitting the data to a training log.
• Combination of Prior Art: Commercially available bike computers before 2012 (e.g., Garmin, Polar, CatEye) and U.S. Provisional Application No. 61/705,232 (training log concept).
• Obviousness Argument: Prior to 2012, numerous bike computers were available that incorporated sensors (e.g., GPS, cadence, heart rate [cite: The patent text mentions the bike computer's sensors may include "a cadence sensor" and "a heart rate sensor."], speed, power), a processor to collect and process data from these sensors, and memory to store the accumulated training data. Many of these devices also included wireless communication capabilities (e.g., ANT+ for sensor communication, or Bluetooth/USB for data transfer to a computer). The concept of an online "training log" for athletes was recognized, as evidenced by U.S. Provisional Application No. 61/705,232. A POSITA would have found it obvious to integrate existing wireless communication means into a bike computer specifically for the purpose of transmitting training data to an online training log (either directly or indirectly via a mobile device). The motivation would be to enhance the functionality and convenience of the bike computer by providing seamless data integration with online platforms, fulfilling the general industry trend towards connected fitness devices and automated data tracking.