US 10894355

Patent Overview: US 10,894,355 B2

Title: Resin Solidification Substrate and Assembly

Patent number: US 10,894,355 B2 (application US 15/288,348; pre-grant publication US 2017/0021562 A1)

Inventor(s): Ali El-Siblani; Alexandr Shkolnik

Original assignee: Global Filtration Systems Inc. (Google Patents also lists Sprintray Inc. as a current assignee, with the caveat that listed assignees may be inaccurate.)

Dates (per the source, which labels priority as an assumption):

• Priority date: 2009-10-19
• Filing date: 2016-10-07
• Publication of pre-grant application: 2017-01-26
• Grant/publication date: 2021-01-19
• Adjusted expiration: 2033-08-10

Purpose and plain-language scope (limited by what the excerpt shows): The patent concerns a substrate, and an assembly incorporating it, on which resin is solidified. The only claim content visible in the supplied text is the title and the "prior art keywords" keyword list — film, solidification substrate, rigid, assembly, solidification — which indicates the subject matter involves a film-based (rather than rigid) solidification substrate within an assembly for resin solidification, as used in layer-by-layer or additive manufacturing (3D printing) contexts. The excerpt does not contain claim language or the written description, so no claim-by-claim scope, term definitions, embodiments, or specific configurations can be stated from this source. Readers should consult the full patent text for the actual claims.

Source: https://patents.google.com/patent/US10894355/en (fetched 2026-10-31; the Google Patents page itself notes that legal status, priority, and assignee listings are assumptions and not legal conclusions).

What the excerpt does not establish:

• The actual claims (independent or dependent), their limitations, or claim scope.
• The detailed description, figures, or embodiments.
• The specific prior art relied upon or the basis for allowance.
• Inventorship disputes, ownership history, or the effect of any later assignment (beyond the listed assignee names).
• Validity, enforceability, or freedom to operate.
• Whether the listed litigation entries (California N.D. and Delaware D. cases) are relevant, since litigation and ownership transfers were outside the requested analysis.

Per the operating rules, no outside research, prior-art analysis, or validity assessment has been performed; statements above are confined to the supplied excerpt.