Invalidity dossier
US 10791440
System and method for provisioning user computing devices based on sensor and state information
Current assignee: SENSAY TECHNOLOGIES LLC
Added 10/14/2026, 12:01:08 PM
Active provider: DeepSeek · deepseek-flash
Patent summary
Title, assignee, inventors, filing/issue dates, abstract, and a plain-language overview of the claims.
Patent Overview — US10791440B2
Title: System and method for provisioning user computing devices based on sensor and state information
Patent number: US10791440B2
Application number: US16/545,759
Inventor: Shamim A. Naqvi
Original assignee: Sensoriant Inc; current assignee listed as SENSAY TECHNOLOGIES LLC
Priority date: 2010-07-21 (noted as an assumption, not a legal conclusion)
Filing date: 2019-08-20
Publication date: 2020-09-29
Anticipated expiration: 2030-07-21
Legal status: Active (listed as an assumption, not a legal conclusion)
Purpose and plain-language scope (from the supplied text): The patent concerns provisioning user computing devices based on sensor and state information. Its classifications point to service provisioning or reconfiguring in wireless networks (H04W4/50), location-based and geofenced services (H04W4/021, H04W4/029), access restriction based on user or terminal location or mobility data (H04W48/04), network/service selection (H04W48/16, H04W48/18), subscriber/profile data handling (H04W8/18, H04W8/20), resource allocation based on terminal or device properties (H04W72/51), and payment-related authorization, transaction verification, and fraud/risk assessment (G06Q20/40, G06Q20/401, G06Q20/4016). Prior-art keywords listed are: resource, user device, network, mobile device, user. In plain terms, the excerpt indicates a system/method for adapting how a user device is provisioned—such as services, network selection, access, and resources—drawing on sensor and state information, with possible applicability to mobile payments and fraud/risk checks.
What the excerpt does not establish: It contains no abstract, description, or claims text, so the actual claimed scope, specific sensor types, state definitions, and provisioning steps cannot be determined. It also does not establish the accuracy of the priority date, legal status, or listed assignees; these are expressly flagged as assumptions. The excerpt reports a "family has litigation" indicator via a third-party link but provides no litigation details, and it gives no substantive prior-art analysis or validity determination. No ownership-transfer, validity, or prior-art conclusions should be drawn from this text alone.
Source: https://patents.google.com/patent/[US10791440](/patent/US10791440)/en
Generated 10/14/2026, 12:01:42 PM
Cases on file (0)
Specific litigation cases in our database that name US patent 10791440. The free-form analysis below may also discuss cases beyond this list.
No cases on file mention this patent. Upload a CSV or add a case manually in Admin → Manage litigation cases.
Litigation summary
Past and pending lawsuits — plaintiffs, defendants, jurisdictions, outcomes, and notable rulings.
Proceedings on file (0)
All PTAB activity →AIA trial proceedings (IPR / PGR / CBM) filed at the USPTO Patent Trial and Appeal Board against this patent. Sourced from the USPTO Open Data Portal and refreshed every six hours; each proceeding number deep-links to the PTAB E2E docket.
No PTAB proceedings on file. This patent has not been challenged via IPR, PGR, or CBM. The absence is itself a signal — well-asserted patents eventually attract IPRs. The LLM analysis below may surface filings the ODP feed hasn’t indexed yet.
PTAB challenges
AIA trial proceedings at the USPTO Patent Trial and Appeal Board — IPR, PGR, and CBM. Petitioners, judge panels, claim-level invalidation outcomes from Final Written Decisions, and Federal Circuit appeals. The single most important defensive datapoint after litigation history.
Assignment history
Inventors, original assignee, and the chain of ownership recorded with the USPTO — including the correspondent attorney who recorded each assignment, since shell-LLC chains often share one repeat-player attorney even when the entity names look unrelated. Surfaces NPE / patent-troll patterns: shell-entity transfers, known asserters in the chain, repeat correspondent fingerprints, pre-litigation assignments, and bankruptcy fire-sales.
Prior art
Earlier patents, publications, and products that may anticipate or render the claims unpatentable.
Obviousness
Combinations of prior art that suggest the claimed invention would have been obvious under 35 U.S.C. § 103.
Extensions
Patent term adjustments, term extensions, continuations, divisionals, family members, and expiration dates.
Derivative works
Defensive disclosure: derivative variations of each claim designed to render future incremental improvements obvious or non-novel.