Invalidity dossier
US 10062062
Automated teller machine (ATM) providing money for loyalty points
Current assignee: Jbshbm LLC
Added 9/23/2026, 5:59:54 PM
Active provider: DeepSeek · deepseek-flash
Patent summary
Title, assignee, inventors, filing/issue dates, abstract, and a plain-language overview of the claims.
Patent Overview: US10062062B1
Title: Automated teller machine (ATM) providing money for loyalty points
Patent number: US10062062B1
Application number: US15/454,040
Inventors: Sean I. Mcghie; Brian K. Buchheit
Original/current assignee: Jbshbm LLC
Filing date: 2017-03-09
Publication/grant date: 2018-08-28
Priority date: 2006-05-25 (claimed from US11/420,255)
Adjusted expiration: 2026-06-26
Legal status (as listed): Expired – Fee Related
Purpose / plain-language scope (based only on the supplied text):
The title identifies the subject matter as an ATM that provides money for loyalty points. The supplied excerpt contains no claims, abstract, or detailed description text, so the precise scope cannot be stated from it. The only substantive signals available are:
- The title, which ties an ATM to exchanging loyalty points for money.
- The listed prior-art keywords: negotiable; account; unattended; credits; accounts — indicating the disclosure involves unattended transactions, negotiable credits/points, and accounts.
Priority chain: The patent claims priority through a series of earlier US applications/publications, including US11/420,255 (US7703673B2), US12/720,743 (US8123127B2), US12/759,506 (US8162209B2), US13/168,814 (US8376224B2), US13/428,656 (US8201734B1), US13/479,417 (US8267315B1), US13/542,451 (US8342399B1), US13/681,493 (US8668146B1), US13/681,479 (US8684265B1), and US15/013,129 (US9704174B1).
What the excerpt does not establish:
- It does not include the claims, abstract, or written description, so the actual claimed scope, embodiments, or limitations are not established.
- It does not establish inventorship accuracy, validity, enforceability, or freedom to operate.
- It does not establish litigation, ownership transfers, licensing, or current ownership beyond the listed assignee (which the source itself notes may be inaccurate).
- Dates and legal status are expressly assumptions per the source, not legal conclusions.
- No prior-art analysis is provided.
Source: https://patents.google.com/patent/[US10062062](/patent/US10062062)/en
Generated 10/1/2026, 9:43:06 PM
Cases on file (0)
Specific litigation cases in our database that name US patent 10062062. The free-form analysis below may also discuss cases beyond this list.
No cases on file mention this patent. Upload a CSV or add a case manually in Admin → Manage litigation cases.
Litigation summary
Past and pending lawsuits — plaintiffs, defendants, jurisdictions, outcomes, and notable rulings.
Proceedings on file (0)
All PTAB activity →AIA trial proceedings (IPR / PGR / CBM) filed at the USPTO Patent Trial and Appeal Board against this patent. Sourced from the USPTO Open Data Portal and refreshed every six hours; each proceeding number deep-links to the PTAB E2E docket.
No PTAB proceedings on file. This patent has not been challenged via IPR, PGR, or CBM. The absence is itself a signal — well-asserted patents eventually attract IPRs. The LLM analysis below may surface filings the ODP feed hasn’t indexed yet.
PTAB challenges
AIA trial proceedings at the USPTO Patent Trial and Appeal Board — IPR, PGR, and CBM. Petitioners, judge panels, claim-level invalidation outcomes from Final Written Decisions, and Federal Circuit appeals. The single most important defensive datapoint after litigation history.
Assignment history
Inventors, original assignee, and the chain of ownership recorded with the USPTO — including the correspondent attorney who recorded each assignment, since shell-LLC chains often share one repeat-player attorney even when the entity names look unrelated. Surfaces NPE / patent-troll patterns: shell-entity transfers, known asserters in the chain, repeat correspondent fingerprints, pre-litigation assignments, and bankruptcy fire-sales.
Prior art
Earlier patents, publications, and products that may anticipate or render the claims unpatentable.
Obviousness
Combinations of prior art that suggest the claimed invention would have been obvious under 35 U.S.C. § 103.
Extensions
Patent term adjustments, term extensions, continuations, divisionals, family members, and expiration dates.
Derivative works
Defensive disclosure: derivative variations of each claim designed to render future incremental improvements obvious or non-novel.