Invalidity dossier
US 10003948
System and method for provisioning user computing devices based on sensor and state information
Current assignee: SENSAY TECHNOLOGIES LLC
Added 10/14/2026, 12:01:06 PM
Active provider: DeepSeek · deepseek-flash
Patent summary
Title, assignee, inventors, filing/issue dates, abstract, and a plain-language overview of the claims.
Patent Overview — US 10003948 B2
Title: System and method for provisioning user computing devices based on sensor and state information
Patent number: US 10003948 B2
Application number: US 15/857,236
Publication date (grant): 2018-06-19
Filing date: 2017-12-28
Priority date (stated as an assumption, not a legal conclusion): 2010-07-21
Anticipated expiration (stated in the source): 2030-07-21
Inventor: Shamim A. Naqvi
Original assignee: Sensoriant Inc
Current assignee (as listed; the source cautions listed assignees may be inaccurate): SENSAY TECHNOLOGIES LLC
Other version: US 20180124546 A1
Legal status listed: Active
Purpose and plain-language scope (from the supplied text):
The title indicates the patent concerns provisioning user computing devices based on sensor and state information. The classification data in the supplied excerpt places the subject matter in wireless communication service provisioning and reconfiguring (H04W4/50), access restriction based on user or terminal location or mobility data such as moving direction or speed (H04W48/04), location-based management or tracking services (H04W4/029), geofencing/point-of-interest services (H04W4/021), processing of user or subscriber data and user profiles (H04W8/18), and transfer of subscriber data (H04W8/20).
The excerpt also classifies the disclosure in payment and transaction-verification areas, including mobile-device banking transactions (G06Q20/3223), transactions dependent on location of mobile devices (G06Q20/3224), and transaction verification involving fraud or risk level assessment (G06Q20/4016), plus wireless-network security arrangements such as access security (H04W12/08) and detection or prevention of fraud (H04W12/12). The listed prior-art keywords are "user device," "resource," "user," "mobile device," and "network."
What the excerpt does not establish:
This is an excerpt only. It contains no claim language, no written description, no drawings, and no abstract. It therefore does not establish the actual claimed scope, the specific sensors or state information used, the provisioning steps, any embodiment details, or the asserted breadth of the disclosure. The priority date and legal status are expressly described in the source as assumptions, not legal conclusions.
Generated 10/14/2026, 12:01:25 PM
Cases on file (0)
Specific litigation cases in our database that name US patent 10003948. The free-form analysis below may also discuss cases beyond this list.
No cases on file mention this patent. Upload a CSV or add a case manually in Admin → Manage litigation cases.
Litigation summary
Past and pending lawsuits — plaintiffs, defendants, jurisdictions, outcomes, and notable rulings.
Proceedings on file (0)
All PTAB activity →AIA trial proceedings (IPR / PGR / CBM) filed at the USPTO Patent Trial and Appeal Board against this patent. Sourced from the USPTO Open Data Portal and refreshed every six hours; each proceeding number deep-links to the PTAB E2E docket.
No PTAB proceedings on file. This patent has not been challenged via IPR, PGR, or CBM. The absence is itself a signal — well-asserted patents eventually attract IPRs. The LLM analysis below may surface filings the ODP feed hasn’t indexed yet.
PTAB challenges
AIA trial proceedings at the USPTO Patent Trial and Appeal Board — IPR, PGR, and CBM. Petitioners, judge panels, claim-level invalidation outcomes from Final Written Decisions, and Federal Circuit appeals. The single most important defensive datapoint after litigation history.
Assignment history
Inventors, original assignee, and the chain of ownership recorded with the USPTO — including the correspondent attorney who recorded each assignment, since shell-LLC chains often share one repeat-player attorney even when the entity names look unrelated. Surfaces NPE / patent-troll patterns: shell-entity transfers, known asserters in the chain, repeat correspondent fingerprints, pre-litigation assignments, and bankruptcy fire-sales.
Prior art
Earlier patents, publications, and products that may anticipate or render the claims unpatentable.
Obviousness
Combinations of prior art that suggest the claimed invention would have been obvious under 35 U.S.C. § 103.
Extensions
Patent term adjustments, term extensions, continuations, divisionals, family members, and expiration dates.
Derivative works
Defensive disclosure: derivative variations of each claim designed to render future incremental improvements obvious or non-novel.