Invalidity dossier

US 940837

Method of and machine for making wire-glass.

Current assignee: Individual

Added 8/27/2026, 1:53:11 PM

At a glanceNo PTAB challengesNo litigation on fileIndustrial Manufacturing (IM)

Active provider: DeepSeek · deepseek-v4-flash

Auto-generating section 1 of 7: Litigation summary

Each section takes ~30-60s with web-search grounding. Keep this tab open — sections will fill in below as they complete.

Patent summary

Title, assignee, inventors, filing/issue dates, abstract, and a plain-language overview of the claims.

✓ Generated

I'll search for the specific patent number 940837 in the USPTO database and CAFC 2026 dockets.

The initial searches returned related Walsh wire-glass patents (940835, 940841) and a different design patent (USD940837S1 — a distinct design-patent number, not the utility patent). Let me verify the specific record for 940837 and check CAFC dockets more directly.

Search Results

USPTO / Google Patents (US940837A): Confirmed. The authoritative full text was provided, and the related-family patents (US940835A, US940836A, US940841A — all Walsh wire-glass patents filed the same day) corroborate the bibliographic details. No CAFC 2026 docket exists for this patent — my docket searches returned no relevant results, which is expected: the patent's legal status is "Expired – Lifetime" with anticipated expiration on 1926-11-23 (17 years from grant), so it cannot appear in 2026 litigation.

Important disambiguation: A search hit for USD940837S1 (ASM IP Holding B.V., filed 2019, issued 2022) is a design patent with a different numbering series (D940,837) — not the utility patent 940,837. It is excluded per your instruction not to return similar numbers.


Summary of US Patent 940,837 A

Field Value
Title Method of and machine for making wire-glass
Patent Number US940837A (US 940,837)
Inventor Robert A. B. Walsh, of St. Louis, Missouri
Assignee None recorded on the face of the patent; Google Patents lists "Individual" (original and current). ⚠️ Note: Google's assignee data is unreliable; the related patent US940836A is assigned to the Mississippi Glass Company, so it is possible 940,837 was likewise commercially assigned, but the record for this patent shows no assignee.
Filing Date December 2, 1907 (Application Serial No. 404,845)
Issue Date November 23, 1909
Status Expired – Lifetime (anticipated expiration November 23, 1926)
Classifications C03B13/00 (Rolling molten glass); C03B13/12 (Rolling glass with enclosures, e.g., wire)
Prior art cited in spec Walsh U.S. Patent No. 610,593 (Sept. 13, 1898); Schmertz Reissue No. 12,443 (Jan. 30, 1906)

Abstract: The patent has no formal USPTO abstract (typical for 1909-era patents). The specification's statement of the object serves as the abstract: "to produce a sheet of wire glass having smooth brilliant surfaces, the wire of said sheet retaining its original bright and new appearance after it has been embedded in the glass." The invention is a method and apparatus for forming a first sheet/layer of glass with a wire mesh completely buried beneath its upper surface (so the heated wire is never exposed to air and does not oxidize/look black), then forming a second, finishing layer of molten glass and welding it to the uneven upper surface of the first sheet — the finishing layer filling the surface irregularities and imparting a smooth finish. The wire mesh is embedded by a special blade-type "embedding roller" (thin, deep, knife-edged blades, explicitly distinguished from a sinusoidal corrugated wash-board-glass roller), leaving soft unchilled protrusions between blades that the top layer welds to.


Plain-Language Overview of the Claims

The patent has 12 claims, all independent in form (each ends "substantially as described"; no dependent claims). Claims 1–7 are apparatus claims; Claims 8–12 are method claims. All share the same core concept: a wire mesh is completely buried under the surface of a first glass layer while hot (preventing oxidation), and a second glass layer is formed and welded on top to give a smooth finish.

  • Claim 1 (apparatus): A machine having (a) means to form a glass sheet, (b) means to then embed wire into it, and (c) means to form another glass sheet and weld it to the first.
  • Claim 2 (apparatus): A wire-glass machine that forms multiple masses of molten glass into layers, forces a wire mesh below the surface of one layer so it is fully covered, and then combines the layers into a single sheet.
  • Claim 3 (apparatus): A rolling machine that makes a sheet with wire buried beneath its surface, one surface having regularly spaced protrusions, plus means to form another glass sheet and weld it to the protrusion-bearing surface.
  • Claim 4 (apparatus): A machine that forms a glass sheet, buries wire beneath the sheet's upper surface, and forms/welds another glass layer onto that uneven upper surface.
  • Claim 5 (apparatus): A machine that forms a glass sheet while simultaneously forcing a wire mesh completely under its upper surface, then forms a second layer and welds it to the first sheet's top surface.
  • Claim 6 (apparatus): A machine with means to form a layer and embed a wire mesh completely under its upper surface, means to form a finishing layer, and means to combine the two layers.
  • Claim 7 (apparatus): A machine with an embedding roller and cooperating means that forms a layer and forces a wire mesh completely under its upper surface, a pair of rolls that form a second layer, and means welding the second layer onto the wire-bearing layer.
  • Claim 8 (method): Making wire glass by forming a glass sheet, embedding wire in it, forming another glass sheet, and welding it to the first.
  • Claim 9 (method): Rolling several masses of molten glass into layers, introducing a wire mesh below the surface of one layer so it is fully covered, and combining the layers into one sheet.
  • Claim 10 (method): Rolling masses of molten glass into layers while simultaneously forcing a wire mesh below the surface of one layer (fully covered), then merging the layers into a single sheet.
  • Claim 11 (method): Forming a mass of molten glass into a layer, forcing a wire mesh into its upper surface so it is fully covered, forming a separate mass of molten glass into another layer, and combining the layers.
  • Claim 12 (method): Rolling a mass of molten glass into a layer while simultaneously embedding a wire mesh in the sheet's upper surface (fully covered), rolling an independent mass of molten glass into a top layer, and combining the layers into a single sheet.

Uncertainty Notes

  • No formal abstract exists on the record; the "abstract" above is synthesized from the specification's stated object.
  • Assignee data is uncertain. The Google Patents metadata ("Individual") is expressly disclaimed as potentially inaccurate, and sibling patent 940,836 names the Mississippi Glass Company as assignee.
  • No CAFC 2026 docket was found for this patent; given its 1926 expiration, none is expected. I did not verify against PACER (not available in my search tools), so if you need a formal confirmation of absence from CAFC records, a direct CAFC/PACER query would be the authoritative check.

Generated 8/27/2026, 1:53:44 PM

Cases on file (0)

Specific litigation cases in our database that name US patent 940837. The free-form analysis below may also discuss cases beyond this list.

No cases on file mention this patent. Upload a CSV or add a case manually in Admin → Manage litigation cases.

Litigation summary

Past and pending lawsuits — plaintiffs, defendants, jurisdictions, outcomes, and notable rulings.

Not generated yet. Click Generate to call the active LLM provider with the configured prompt.

Proceedings on file (0)

All PTAB activity →

AIA trial proceedings (IPR / PGR / CBM) filed at the USPTO Patent Trial and Appeal Board against this patent. Sourced from the USPTO Open Data Portal and refreshed every six hours; each proceeding number deep-links to the PTAB E2E docket.

No PTAB proceedings on file. This patent has not been challenged via IPR, PGR, or CBM. The absence is itself a signal — well-asserted patents eventually attract IPRs. The LLM analysis below may surface filings the ODP feed hasn’t indexed yet.

PTAB challenges

AIA trial proceedings at the USPTO Patent Trial and Appeal Board — IPR, PGR, and CBM. Petitioners, judge panels, claim-level invalidation outcomes from Final Written Decisions, and Federal Circuit appeals. The single most important defensive datapoint after litigation history.

Not generated yet. Click Generate to call the active LLM provider with the configured prompt.

Assignment history

Inventors, original assignee, and the chain of ownership recorded with the USPTO — including the correspondent attorney who recorded each assignment, since shell-LLC chains often share one repeat-player attorney even when the entity names look unrelated. Surfaces NPE / patent-troll patterns: shell-entity transfers, known asserters in the chain, repeat correspondent fingerprints, pre-litigation assignments, and bankruptcy fire-sales.

Not generated yet. Click Generate to call the active LLM provider with the configured prompt.

Prior art

Earlier patents, publications, and products that may anticipate or render the claims unpatentable.

Not generated yet. Click Generate to call the active LLM provider with the configured prompt.

Obviousness

Combinations of prior art that suggest the claimed invention would have been obvious under 35 U.S.C. § 103.

Not generated yet. Click Generate to call the active LLM provider with the configured prompt.

Extensions

Patent term adjustments, term extensions, continuations, divisionals, family members, and expiration dates.

Not generated yet. Click Generate to call the active LLM provider with the configured prompt.

Derivative works

Defensive disclosure: derivative variations of each claim designed to render future incremental improvements obvious or non-novel.

Not generated yet. Click Generate to call the active LLM provider with the configured prompt.

Keep exploring

Other patents in Industrial Manufacturing (IM)

See all Industrial Manufacturing (IM) patents →