Invalidity dossier
US 9137634
Method and system for obtaining emergency caller location
Current assignee: TP Lab Inc
Added 9/23/2026, 12:55:48 PM
Active provider: DeepSeek · deepseek-flash
Patent summary
Title, assignee, inventors, filing/issue dates, abstract, and a plain-language overview of the claims.
Patent Overview: US9137634B1
Title: Method and system for obtaining emergency caller location
Patent number: US9137634B1
Application number: US14/226,832
Filing date: 2014-03-27
Publication/grant date: 2015-09-15
Priority date (as listed; noted as an assumption): 2005-07-14
Anticipated expiration (per source): 2025-07-14
Status (per source): Expired – Fee Related
Inventors: Chi Fai Ho; Shin Cheung Simon Chiu
Original Assignee: TP Lab Inc (source lists further reassignments; not analyzed here)
Source: https://patents.google.com/patent/[US9137634](/patent/US9137634)/en
Purpose: The patent addresses locating a caller during a telephone call, particularly emergency calls. The background explains that traditional residential telephone service maps a subscription's telephone number to a fixed street address in an Automatic Location identity (ALI) database, which a 911 selective router and Public Safety Answering Point (PSAP) use to dispatch services. With VoIP, an IP telephone can be moved—home, a neighbor's gateway, or a hotel network—so the registered subscription address may not reflect the caller's actual location, risking misdirected emergency response.
Plain-language scope: Embodiments described include systems and methods for obtaining a caller's location during a telephone call. A phone system obtains the subscriber access line identity of a subscriber access line and sends it to a subscriber location query system, which returns a subscriber location or subscriber location record. Subscriber phone equipment (or phone) can store a subscriber access line identity, and that stored identity can be used to retrieve the subscriber location record with the corresponding subscriber access line identity.
What the excerpt does not establish: It does not provide the full claims, complete description, or drawings; does not enumerate specific prior-art references; and does not establish the legal status, enforceability, or accuracy of the listed dates, assignees, or expiration. The priority date, legal status, and assignee listings are expressly flagged in the source as assumptions. Litigation, ownership transfers, validity, and prior art are outside this overview.
Generated 10/1/2026, 9:53:23 PM
Cases on file (0)
Specific litigation cases in our database that name US patent 9137634. The free-form analysis below may also discuss cases beyond this list.
No cases on file mention this patent. Upload a CSV or add a case manually in Admin → Manage litigation cases.
Litigation summary
Past and pending lawsuits — plaintiffs, defendants, jurisdictions, outcomes, and notable rulings.
Proceedings on file (0)
All PTAB activity →AIA trial proceedings (IPR / PGR / CBM) filed at the USPTO Patent Trial and Appeal Board against this patent. Sourced from the USPTO Open Data Portal and refreshed every six hours; each proceeding number deep-links to the PTAB E2E docket.
No PTAB proceedings on file. This patent has not been challenged via IPR, PGR, or CBM. The absence is itself a signal — well-asserted patents eventually attract IPRs. The LLM analysis below may surface filings the ODP feed hasn’t indexed yet.
PTAB challenges
AIA trial proceedings at the USPTO Patent Trial and Appeal Board — IPR, PGR, and CBM. Petitioners, judge panels, claim-level invalidation outcomes from Final Written Decisions, and Federal Circuit appeals. The single most important defensive datapoint after litigation history.
Assignment history
Inventors, original assignee, and the chain of ownership recorded with the USPTO — including the correspondent attorney who recorded each assignment, since shell-LLC chains often share one repeat-player attorney even when the entity names look unrelated. Surfaces NPE / patent-troll patterns: shell-entity transfers, known asserters in the chain, repeat correspondent fingerprints, pre-litigation assignments, and bankruptcy fire-sales.
Prior art
Earlier patents, publications, and products that may anticipate or render the claims unpatentable.
Obviousness
Combinations of prior art that suggest the claimed invention would have been obvious under 35 U.S.C. § 103.
Extensions
Patent term adjustments, term extensions, continuations, divisionals, family members, and expiration dates.
Derivative works
Defensive disclosure: derivative variations of each claim designed to render future incremental improvements obvious or non-novel.