Invalidity dossier

US 9021112

Content request routing and load balancing for content distribution networks

Current assignee: Sandpiper CDN, LLC

Added 8/26/2026, 12:48:56 AM

At a glanceNo PTAB challenges2 lawsuits on fileasserted by Sandpiper CDN, LLC

Active provider: DeepSeek · deepseek-v4-flash

Patent summary

Title, assignee, inventors, filing/issue dates, abstract, and a plain-language overview of the claims.

✓ Generated

Patent Overview — US9021112B2

Title: Content request routing and load balancing for content distribution networks

Patent number / application: US9021112B2; Application US12/050,648.

Inventors: Michael Slocombe, Matthew Miller, Casey Ajalat, Vincent A. Fuller, III.

Assignee information (as listed): Original assignee Level 3 Communications LLC; current assignees listed as Genuity Inc and Sandpiper CDN LLC. (Recorded reassignments appear in the source; they are noted here only as listed.)

Key dates (as listed): Prior art date 2001-10-18; filing date 2008-03-18; publication of US20080235400A1 on 2008-09-25; grant/publication of US9021112B2 on 2015-04-28; anticipated expiration 2021-10-18. Legal status: Expired – Fee Related.

Purpose: Embodiments relate generally to information retrieval in a network and, more particularly, to hosting and distributing content on a content delivery network such as the Internet. The stated aim is to let a content requester retrieve content from a content site closer than the content provider's origin server, while distributing load from many end users among multiple systems across different parts of the network.

Plain-language scope (from the excerpt): A method of content delivery in a network includes associating Domain Name System (DNS) devices with content server systems that maintain and serve a content provider's content, each DNS device configured to resolve the provider's name to an address for its associated content server system. The method further includes assigning to the DNS devices a common address, usable to resolve the provider's name so that a content request is sent to the content server system nearest the requestor. The described implementation uses pre-existing routing infrastructure, anycast address service, and Border Gateway Protocol (BGP); because DNS uses a stateless protocol (UDP) for routing, the approach is described as handling anycast-addressable caching without problems associated with anycast service, such as potential packet-by-packet load-balancing side effects of stateful protocols like TCP.

Source: https://patents.google.com/patent/[US9021112](/patent/US9021112)/en

What the excerpt does not establish: It does not provide the full claims, detailed description, or drawings; the complete written description; the full prosecution history; the precise current ownership chain; or any determination of validity, enforceability, or claim scope. The supplied text is an excerpt (indicated by "consult the source for omitted text"), and the provided figures (FIG. 1–5) are referenced but not reproduced here.

Generated 10/1/2026, 10:03:57 PM

Cases on file (2)

Group view →

Specific litigation cases in our database that name US patent 9021112. The free-form analysis below may also discuss cases beyond this list.

Litigation summary

Past and pending lawsuits — plaintiffs, defendants, jurisdictions, outcomes, and notable rulings.

Log in to generate
Not generated yet. Log in to request this analysis.

Proceedings on file (0)

All PTAB activity →

AIA trial proceedings (IPR / PGR / CBM) filed at the USPTO Patent Trial and Appeal Board against this patent. Sourced from the USPTO Open Data Portal and refreshed every six hours; each proceeding number deep-links to the PTAB E2E docket.

Current assignee: Sandpiper CDN, LLC

No PTAB proceedings on file. This patent has not been challenged via IPR, PGR, or CBM. The absence is itself a signal — well-asserted patents eventually attract IPRs. The LLM analysis below may surface filings the ODP feed hasn’t indexed yet.

PTAB challenges

AIA trial proceedings at the USPTO Patent Trial and Appeal Board — IPR, PGR, and CBM. Petitioners, judge panels, claim-level invalidation outcomes from Final Written Decisions, and Federal Circuit appeals. The single most important defensive datapoint after litigation history.

Log in to generate
Not generated yet. Log in to request this analysis.

Assignment history

Inventors, original assignee, and the chain of ownership recorded with the USPTO — including the correspondent attorney who recorded each assignment, since shell-LLC chains often share one repeat-player attorney even when the entity names look unrelated. Surfaces NPE / patent-troll patterns: shell-entity transfers, known asserters in the chain, repeat correspondent fingerprints, pre-litigation assignments, and bankruptcy fire-sales.

Log in to generate
Not generated yet. Log in to request this analysis.

Prior art

Earlier patents, publications, and products that may anticipate or render the claims unpatentable.

Log in to generate
Not generated yet. Log in to request this analysis.

Obviousness

Combinations of prior art that suggest the claimed invention would have been obvious under 35 U.S.C. § 103.

Log in to generate
Not generated yet. Log in to request this analysis.

Extensions

Patent term adjustments, term extensions, continuations, divisionals, family members, and expiration dates.

Log in to generate
Not generated yet. Log in to request this analysis.

Derivative works

Defensive disclosure: derivative variations of each claim designed to render future incremental improvements obvious or non-novel.

Log in to generate
Not generated yet. Log in to request this analysis.

Keep exploring

More patents asserted by Sandpiper CDN, LLC

This patent in court (2)

2 tracked lawsuits name US 9021112.