- Filed
- Oct 26, 2026
- Last modified
- Oct 26, 2026
- Petitioner
- Bloom Energy Corp.
- Inventor
- Marco Brandner et al
Invalidity dossier
US 8753785
Shaped part
Current assignee: Plansee SE
Added 10/27/2026, 12:00:25 AM
Active provider: DeepSeek · deepseek-flash
Patent summary
Title, assignee, inventors, filing/issue dates, abstract, and a plain-language overview of the claims.
Patent Overview — US 8,753,785 B2
Title: Shaped part
Assignee: Plansee SE (original assignee; the listing notes the assignee data may be inaccurate)
Key dates: Priority 2009‑12‑15; application US 12/969,067 filed 2010‑12‑15; published as US 2011/0143261 A1 on 2011‑06‑16; granted 2014‑06‑17. The listing shows the patent as active with an adjusted expiration of 2032‑07‑22.
Inventors: Marco Brandner, Stefan Gerzoskovitz, Wolfgang Kraussler, Alexander Leuprecht, Andreas Venskutonis.
Purpose and plain-language scope: The patent concerns a shaped part made by pressing and sintering a powdered starting material. The part has a basic body with knob- or ridge-like elevations on one side (end plates) or both sides (interconnectors) of a fuel cell stack. The excerpt's stated objective is to design the geometry of these elevations so that a single-stage pressing operation yields sufficient density and homogeneity, which matters because high-chromium alloys used for such parts are brittle and hard to press. By the summary's wording, the elevations have a height h and, in cross section, two inclined side flanks that run via rounded corners of radius r and r′ into curved portions of radius R and R′, whose transitions to the basic body have inclination angles α and α′ of 95° to 135°. The curved portions merge into the body surface. The stated characterizing feature is that R (or R′) is 0.15–1 mm and the ratio R:h (or R′:h) is 0.25–1. The summary describes narrower optional ranges (angles down to 95–110°; R 0.3–1 mm; R:h 0.5–1 or 0.7–1), use for interconnectors and end plates, and chromium-containing alloys (e.g., ~95 wt% Cr with an Fe prealloy containing yttrium). The excerpt also mentions FEM simulation comparisons (Drucker–Prager Cap model) showing higher pressed density for the inventive geometry.
Not established by the excerpt: The full text of the claims, the number and exact wording of claims, the detailed description, the drawings, and the specific prior-art references relied on. The file history, any validity or enforceability conclusions, and any litigation are likewise outside this excerpt.
Generated 10/27/2026, 12:00:48 AM
Cases on file (0)
Specific litigation cases in our database that name US patent 8753785. The free-form analysis below may also discuss cases beyond this list.
No cases on file mention this patent. Upload a CSV or add a case manually in Admin → Manage litigation cases.
Litigation summary
Past and pending lawsuits — plaintiffs, defendants, jurisdictions, outcomes, and notable rulings.
Proceedings on file (1)
All PTAB activity →AIA trial proceedings (IPR / PGR / CBM) filed at the USPTO Patent Trial and Appeal Board against this patent. Sourced from the USPTO Open Data Portal and refreshed every six hours; each proceeding number deep-links to the PTAB E2E docket.
PTAB challenges
AIA trial proceedings at the USPTO Patent Trial and Appeal Board — IPR, PGR, and CBM. Petitioners, judge panels, claim-level invalidation outcomes from Final Written Decisions, and Federal Circuit appeals. The single most important defensive datapoint after litigation history.
Assignment history
Inventors, original assignee, and the chain of ownership recorded with the USPTO — including the correspondent attorney who recorded each assignment, since shell-LLC chains often share one repeat-player attorney even when the entity names look unrelated. Surfaces NPE / patent-troll patterns: shell-entity transfers, known asserters in the chain, repeat correspondent fingerprints, pre-litigation assignments, and bankruptcy fire-sales.
Prior art
Earlier patents, publications, and products that may anticipate or render the claims unpatentable.
Obviousness
Combinations of prior art that suggest the claimed invention would have been obvious under 35 U.S.C. § 103.
Extensions
Patent term adjustments, term extensions, continuations, divisionals, family members, and expiration dates.
Derivative works
Defensive disclosure: derivative variations of each claim designed to render future incremental improvements obvious or non-novel.