Invalidity dossier

US 8651434

Methods and systems for rail communication

Current assignee: Transportation IP Holdings LLC

Added 9/23/2026, 10:21:51 PM

At a glanceNo PTAB challengesNo litigation on file

Active provider: DeepSeek · deepseek-flash

Patent summary

Title, assignee, inventors, filing/issue dates, abstract, and a plain-language overview of the claims.

✓ Generated

Patent Overview: US8651434B2 — Methods and Systems for Rail Communication

Title: Methods and systems for rail communication

Patent number / application: US8651434B2; Application US12/911,816

Inventors: Wolfgang Daum; Jared Klineman Cooper

Assignee (as listed): Original assignee General Electric Co; current assignee listed as Transportation IP Holdings LLC

Key dates (as listed): Priority/filing date 2010-10-26; publication of US20120097803A1 on 2012-04-26; granted 2014-02-18; legal status "Expired - Fee Related," adjusted expiration 2031-08-21

Purpose: The disclosure addresses communicating data over a rail. It notes that wireless communication in rail yards suffers from scarce frequency bandwidth and prevalent interference due to the density of rail vehicles and communication devices.

Plain-language scope: A remote control unit generates acoustic (structure-borne) signals and sends them through a rail of a designated section of track. A receiver unit coupled to a rail vehicle receives the signals, derives control commands, and sends them through an interface to control the vehicle — for example, adjusting speed or braking. The remote control unit may be positionally fixed and permanently coupled to a section of track defined by physical gaps in the rail (e.g., from switches), which limit acoustic signals to that section and reduce interference. Different sections may be assigned different transmission frequencies or identifiers; receiving a non-designated frequency can indicate that adjacent sections have been acoustically linked (e.g., by a vehicle traversing them), prompting operation adjustments to avoid collisions. The receiver unit may be portable and temporarily coupled to different vehicles. The remote control unit includes a processor, non-transitive storage, control inputs, and an audio transceiver, which may transmit at frequencies outside rail-vehicle wheel acoustic signatures. Alternatively, signals may pass through a third rail or catenary line.

What the excerpt does not establish: It does not provide full claims, complete specification text (the excerpt is truncated), detailed figures, or any analysis of validity, infringement, or prior art. Ownership and legal-status entries are listed as assumptions, not legal conclusions.

Source: https://patents.google.com/patent/[US8651434](/patent/US8651434)/en

Generated 10/1/2026, 9:33:30 PM

Cases on file (0)

Specific litigation cases in our database that name US patent 8651434. The free-form analysis below may also discuss cases beyond this list.

No cases on file mention this patent. Upload a CSV or add a case manually in Admin → Manage litigation cases.

Litigation summary

Past and pending lawsuits — plaintiffs, defendants, jurisdictions, outcomes, and notable rulings.

Log in to generate
Not generated yet. Log in to request this analysis.

Proceedings on file (0)

All PTAB activity →

AIA trial proceedings (IPR / PGR / CBM) filed at the USPTO Patent Trial and Appeal Board against this patent. Sourced from the USPTO Open Data Portal and refreshed every six hours; each proceeding number deep-links to the PTAB E2E docket.

No PTAB proceedings on file. This patent has not been challenged via IPR, PGR, or CBM. The absence is itself a signal — well-asserted patents eventually attract IPRs. The LLM analysis below may surface filings the ODP feed hasn’t indexed yet.

PTAB challenges

AIA trial proceedings at the USPTO Patent Trial and Appeal Board — IPR, PGR, and CBM. Petitioners, judge panels, claim-level invalidation outcomes from Final Written Decisions, and Federal Circuit appeals. The single most important defensive datapoint after litigation history.

Log in to generate
Not generated yet. Log in to request this analysis.

Assignment history

Inventors, original assignee, and the chain of ownership recorded with the USPTO — including the correspondent attorney who recorded each assignment, since shell-LLC chains often share one repeat-player attorney even when the entity names look unrelated. Surfaces NPE / patent-troll patterns: shell-entity transfers, known asserters in the chain, repeat correspondent fingerprints, pre-litigation assignments, and bankruptcy fire-sales.

Log in to generate
Not generated yet. Log in to request this analysis.

Prior art

Earlier patents, publications, and products that may anticipate or render the claims unpatentable.

Log in to generate
Not generated yet. Log in to request this analysis.

Obviousness

Combinations of prior art that suggest the claimed invention would have been obvious under 35 U.S.C. § 103.

Log in to generate
Not generated yet. Log in to request this analysis.

Extensions

Patent term adjustments, term extensions, continuations, divisionals, family members, and expiration dates.

Log in to generate
Not generated yet. Log in to request this analysis.

Derivative works

Defensive disclosure: derivative variations of each claim designed to render future incremental improvements obvious or non-novel.

Log in to generate
Not generated yet. Log in to request this analysis.