Invalidity dossier

US 8637126

Biodegradable paper-based laminate with oxygen and moisture barrier properties and method for making biodegradable paper-based laminate

Current assignee: Graphic Packaging International LLC

Added 9/24/2026, 12:04:34 AM

At a glanceNo PTAB challengesNo litigation on file

Active provider: DeepSeek · deepseek-flash

Patent summary

Title, assignee, inventors, filing/issue dates, abstract, and a plain-language overview of the claims.

✓ Generated

US8637126B2 — Concise Patent Overview

Title: Biodegradable paper-based laminate with oxygen and moisture barrier properties and method for making biodegradable paper-based laminate

Patent number: US8637126B2
Application number: US11/348,150
Inventors: Christopher S. Cleveland; Tricia S. Reighard; James I. Marchman
Original assignee: International Paper Co
Current assignee (per listing): Graphic Packaging International LLC; Graphic Packaging International Partners LLC
Priority/filing date: 2006-02-06
Publication date (grant): 2014-01-28
Legal status (as listed): Active, adjusted expiration 2028-09-13

Purpose (plain language): The patent concerns a paper-based laminate intended to provide both oxygen-barrier and moisture-barrier properties while remaining biodegradable. The classification data reinforce this: B32B29/00, B32B27/10, B32B27/30, B32B27/306 (vinyl acetate/vinyl alcohol copolymers), B32B27/32 (polyolefins), B32B27/36 (polyesters), B65D65/46 (disintegrable, dissolvable or edible packaging materials), plus tags for "Biodegradable," "Oxygen barrier," and "Water vapor barrier," and end uses such as food packaging and boxes/cartons.

Scope indicators from the excerpt: The listed prior-art keywords — weight, moisture, "protectant layer," product according, percent — suggest claims expressed in terms of layer composition and weight percentages. The layered structure classes point to a paper or cardboard layer combined with synthetic-resin layers. The title also recites a "method for making" the laminate, so both product and method subject matter appear to be covered.

Family: Related filings are listed for TW, KR, EP, CA, PCT/WO, AU, JP, CN, and BR, with US20070184220A1 as the pre-grant publication.

Source: https://patents.google.com/patent/[US8637126](/patent/US8637126)/en

What the excerpt does not establish: It contains no claim language, no written description, no examples, no measured barrier values, and no identified prior-art references. Therefore the specific compositional limits, layer order or thicknesses, biodegradability standard, claimed percentages, and the actual method steps cannot be stated from the supplied text. Also not established here: why the application was allowed, or any comparison against cited art. (Per instructions, no litigation, assignment-chain analysis, validity, or prior-art research was performed.)

Generated 10/1/2026, 9:32:06 PM

Cases on file (0)

Specific litigation cases in our database that name US patent 8637126. The free-form analysis below may also discuss cases beyond this list.

No cases on file mention this patent. Upload a CSV or add a case manually in Admin → Manage litigation cases.

Litigation summary

Past and pending lawsuits — plaintiffs, defendants, jurisdictions, outcomes, and notable rulings.

Log in to generate
Not generated yet. Log in to request this analysis.

Proceedings on file (0)

All PTAB activity →

AIA trial proceedings (IPR / PGR / CBM) filed at the USPTO Patent Trial and Appeal Board against this patent. Sourced from the USPTO Open Data Portal and refreshed every six hours; each proceeding number deep-links to the PTAB E2E docket.

No PTAB proceedings on file. This patent has not been challenged via IPR, PGR, or CBM. The absence is itself a signal — well-asserted patents eventually attract IPRs. The LLM analysis below may surface filings the ODP feed hasn’t indexed yet.

PTAB challenges

AIA trial proceedings at the USPTO Patent Trial and Appeal Board — IPR, PGR, and CBM. Petitioners, judge panels, claim-level invalidation outcomes from Final Written Decisions, and Federal Circuit appeals. The single most important defensive datapoint after litigation history.

Log in to generate
Not generated yet. Log in to request this analysis.

Assignment history

Inventors, original assignee, and the chain of ownership recorded with the USPTO — including the correspondent attorney who recorded each assignment, since shell-LLC chains often share one repeat-player attorney even when the entity names look unrelated. Surfaces NPE / patent-troll patterns: shell-entity transfers, known asserters in the chain, repeat correspondent fingerprints, pre-litigation assignments, and bankruptcy fire-sales.

Log in to generate
Not generated yet. Log in to request this analysis.

Prior art

Earlier patents, publications, and products that may anticipate or render the claims unpatentable.

Log in to generate
Not generated yet. Log in to request this analysis.

Obviousness

Combinations of prior art that suggest the claimed invention would have been obvious under 35 U.S.C. § 103.

Log in to generate
Not generated yet. Log in to request this analysis.

Extensions

Patent term adjustments, term extensions, continuations, divisionals, family members, and expiration dates.

Log in to generate
Not generated yet. Log in to request this analysis.

Derivative works

Defensive disclosure: derivative variations of each claim designed to render future incremental improvements obvious or non-novel.

Log in to generate
Not generated yet. Log in to request this analysis.