Invalidity dossier
US 8503972
Multi-functional remote monitoring system
Current assignee: Kustom Entertainment Inc
Added 9/23/2026, 12:58:40 PM
Active provider: DeepSeek · deepseek-flash
Patent summary
Title, assignee, inventors, filing/issue dates, abstract, and a plain-language overview of the claims.
Patent Overview — US 8,503,972 B2
Title: Multi-functional remote monitoring system
Patent number / application: US 8,503,972 B2; Application US 12/609,811
Assignee: Digital Ally, Inc. (original assignee and current assignee per the source; assignment recorded 2010-03-11)
Inventors: Robert D. Haler; Leslie R. Pingel; Yancy E. Scroggins; Walter T. Morrey
Key dates (as listed): Priority date 2008-10-30; filing date 2009-10-30; publication of US 2010/0167687 A1 on 2010-07-01; granted 2013-08-06; legal status Active with adjusted expiration 2031-11-15. (The source labels priority/legal status as assumptions, not legal conclusions.)
Purpose: The invention is a multi-functional remote monitoring system for use as an evidence-gathering tool in a mobile video surveillance system, particularly for law enforcement. It addresses the problem that a wireless microphone recording audio beyond its base station's transmit range could lose evidence if the base station could not receive and store those signals.
Plain-language scope: A host controller, a hub transceiver (e.g., an in-car transceiver), and one or more remote monitoring transmitters (RMTs) communicate bi-directionally, sending and receiving audio and data signals. Each RMT is wireless and includes a microphone, speaker, microprocessor, and onboard memory; it records audio, transmits to the hub transceiver in real time when in range, and otherwise stores recordings in onboard memory for later transmission when back in range. RMTs may also include a GPS transceiver, fingerprint reader, and still/video capture, and may transmit such data to the hub for processing. A UV LED and/or IR LED illuminator may assist in verifying driver's-license authenticity. RMTs and hub transceivers can act as nodes/routers in a mesh network, and a single hub transceiver can operate with multiple RMTs. An Emergency/Officer Down mode scans all channels for any available hub beacon.
Source: https://patents.google.com/patent/US8503972/en
What the excerpt does not establish: It supplies no claims text, no detailed description or figures, no prior-art references, no prosecution history, no litigation, validity, or ownership-transfer analysis, and no specification of component hardware, protocols, power calculations, or mesh-networking implementation details.
Generated 10/1/2026, 9:53:21 PM
Cases on file (0)
Specific litigation cases in our database that name US patent 8503972. The free-form analysis below may also discuss cases beyond this list.
No cases on file mention this patent. Upload a CSV or add a case manually in Admin → Manage litigation cases.
Litigation summary
Past and pending lawsuits — plaintiffs, defendants, jurisdictions, outcomes, and notable rulings.
Proceedings on file (0)
All PTAB activity →AIA trial proceedings (IPR / PGR / CBM) filed at the USPTO Patent Trial and Appeal Board against this patent. Sourced from the USPTO Open Data Portal and refreshed every six hours; each proceeding number deep-links to the PTAB E2E docket.
No PTAB proceedings on file. This patent has not been challenged via IPR, PGR, or CBM. The absence is itself a signal — well-asserted patents eventually attract IPRs. The LLM analysis below may surface filings the ODP feed hasn’t indexed yet.
PTAB challenges
AIA trial proceedings at the USPTO Patent Trial and Appeal Board — IPR, PGR, and CBM. Petitioners, judge panels, claim-level invalidation outcomes from Final Written Decisions, and Federal Circuit appeals. The single most important defensive datapoint after litigation history.
Assignment history
Inventors, original assignee, and the chain of ownership recorded with the USPTO — including the correspondent attorney who recorded each assignment, since shell-LLC chains often share one repeat-player attorney even when the entity names look unrelated. Surfaces NPE / patent-troll patterns: shell-entity transfers, known asserters in the chain, repeat correspondent fingerprints, pre-litigation assignments, and bankruptcy fire-sales.
Prior art
Earlier patents, publications, and products that may anticipate or render the claims unpatentable.
Obviousness
Combinations of prior art that suggest the claimed invention would have been obvious under 35 U.S.C. § 103.
Extensions
Patent term adjustments, term extensions, continuations, divisionals, family members, and expiration dates.
Derivative works
Defensive disclosure: derivative variations of each claim designed to render future incremental improvements obvious or non-novel.