Invalidity dossier
US 8413238
Monitoring darknet access to identify malicious activity
Current assignee: Zscaler Inc
Added 9/21/2026, 1:08:56 PM
Active provider: DeepSeek · deepseek-flash
Patent summary
Title, assignee, inventors, filing/issue dates, abstract, and a plain-language overview of the claims.
Patent Overview — US 8,413,238 B1
Title: "Monitoring darknet access to identify malicious activity"
Patent number / type: US 8,413,238 B1 (granted patent).
Application: US 12/176,912.
Inventors: Michael Sutton.
Assignee: Zscaler, Inc. (original assignee); an earlier assignment to SafeChannel Inc. is recorded. Per the operating rules, no ownership-transfer analysis is offered.
Key dates (as listed):
- Prior art date: 2008-07-21
- Filing date: 2008-07-21
- Publication/grant date: 2013-04-02
- Legal status: Active, adjusted expiration 2030-08-26 (status is an assumption per the source, not a legal conclusion).
Purpose / plain-language scope: The disclosure addresses identifying malicious activity by watching for access attempts to darknet addresses — IP addresses that are unassigned or unused. Darknet traffic is described as arising from roughly three causes: accident/mistake, backscatter, and malicious scanning, with automated scanning by malicious code supplying most such traffic; malicious code commonly selects target addresses randomly and does not avoid darknets.
One described method (a stated aspect of the subject matter) includes: identifying a list of darknet addresses; monitoring communications originating from a protected network; comparing destination addresses of those communications against the darknet list; and, on a match, providing notification of potential malicious activity originating from the protected network. The system may be implemented as an overlay network (a distributed security system) with content processing nodes serving as an access layer, plus authority nodes that distribute policy and threat data — including "known darknet IP address ranges." The text notes that inspecting all enterprise traffic this way allows identifying traffic destined for darknet space without having to acquire darknet addresses themselves, thereby avoiding possible violation of a regional Internet registry's rules.
Classifications noted: G06F21/00, G06F21/82, G06F21/85; H04L63/1408, H04L63/1416, H04L63/1441, H04L63/0227; H04L2463/144 (botnets).
Source: https://patents.google.com/patent/US8413238/en
What the excerpt does not establish: It does not provide the full claims, complete specification, or drawing contents (figures are referenced only by caption), and does not establish any litigation, validity determination, or prior-art analysis. Details of omitted text cannot be confirmed from the supplied excerpt.
Generated 10/1/2026, 10:00:49 PM
Cases on file (0)
Specific litigation cases in our database that name US patent 8413238. The free-form analysis below may also discuss cases beyond this list.
No cases on file mention this patent. Upload a CSV or add a case manually in Admin → Manage litigation cases.
Litigation summary
Past and pending lawsuits — plaintiffs, defendants, jurisdictions, outcomes, and notable rulings.
Proceedings on file (0)
All PTAB activity →AIA trial proceedings (IPR / PGR / CBM) filed at the USPTO Patent Trial and Appeal Board against this patent. Sourced from the USPTO Open Data Portal and refreshed every six hours; each proceeding number deep-links to the PTAB E2E docket.
No PTAB proceedings on file. This patent has not been challenged via IPR, PGR, or CBM. The absence is itself a signal — well-asserted patents eventually attract IPRs. The LLM analysis below may surface filings the ODP feed hasn’t indexed yet.
PTAB challenges
AIA trial proceedings at the USPTO Patent Trial and Appeal Board — IPR, PGR, and CBM. Petitioners, judge panels, claim-level invalidation outcomes from Final Written Decisions, and Federal Circuit appeals. The single most important defensive datapoint after litigation history.
Assignment history
Inventors, original assignee, and the chain of ownership recorded with the USPTO — including the correspondent attorney who recorded each assignment, since shell-LLC chains often share one repeat-player attorney even when the entity names look unrelated. Surfaces NPE / patent-troll patterns: shell-entity transfers, known asserters in the chain, repeat correspondent fingerprints, pre-litigation assignments, and bankruptcy fire-sales.
Prior art
Earlier patents, publications, and products that may anticipate or render the claims unpatentable.
Obviousness
Combinations of prior art that suggest the claimed invention would have been obvious under 35 U.S.C. § 103.
Extensions
Patent term adjustments, term extensions, continuations, divisionals, family members, and expiration dates.
Derivative works
Defensive disclosure: derivative variations of each claim designed to render future incremental improvements obvious or non-novel.