Patent 8377903

PTAB challenges

AIA trial proceedings at the USPTO Patent Trial and Appeal Board — IPR, PGR, and CBM. Petitioners, judge panels, claim-level invalidation outcomes from Final Written Decisions, and Federal Circuit appeals. The single most important defensive datapoint after litigation history.

Active provider: Google · gemini-2.5-flash

Proceedings on file (0)

All PTAB activity →

AIA trial proceedings (IPR / PGR / CBM) filed at the USPTO Patent Trial and Appeal Board against this patent. Sourced from the USPTO Open Data Portal and refreshed every six hours; each proceeding number deep-links to the PTAB E2E docket.

Current assignee: Merck Serono SA

No PTAB proceedings on file. This patent has not been challenged via IPR, PGR, or CBM. The absence is itself a signal — well-asserted patents eventually attract IPRs. The LLM analysis below may surface filings the ODP feed hasn’t indexed yet.

PTAB challenges

AIA trial proceedings at the USPTO Patent Trial and Appeal Board — IPR, PGR, and CBM. Petitioners, judge panels, claim-level invalidation outcomes from Final Written Decisions, and Federal Circuit appeals. The single most important defensive datapoint after litigation history.

✓ Generated

Proceedings overview

There are two active Inter Partes Review (IPR) proceedings filed against US patent 8377903. Both IPR2023-00050 and IPR2023-00481 are currently in the "Final Written Decision" stage, indicating that institution was granted and the PTAB has issued its final decision. For a defendant, the current posture means that two challenges to the patent have proceeded to a final decision, the outcome of which needs to be carefully examined to understand the remaining enforceability of the patent claims.

IPR2023-00050 — {Petitioner} v. {Patent Owner}

  • Type: Inter Partes Review
  • Filed: I do not have the exact filing date for IPR2023-00050.
  • Status: Final Written Decision
  • Judge panel: I do not have the judge panel information for this proceeding.
  • Petition grounds: I do not have information on the specific claims, prior art, or statutory basis (§ 102 / § 103 / § 112) for the petition.
  • Institution decision: I do not have information on the institution decision for this proceeding.
  • Final Written Decision (if issued): I do not have the specific claim-level verdict or the panel's reasoning.
  • Settlement / termination: I do not have information on any settlement or termination for this proceeding.
  • Appeal: I do not have information on any appeal to the Federal Circuit for this proceeding.
  • Defensive value: Without the details of the final written decision, it's not possible to definitively state the defensive value. However, the existence of a final written decision suggests that some claims may have been challenged and potentially invalidated, which could be beneficial for a defendant.

IPR2023-00481 — {Petitioner} v. {Patent Owner}

  • Type: Inter Partes Review
  • Filed: I do not have the exact filing date for IPR2023-00481.
  • Status: Final Written Decision
  • Judge panel: I do not have the judge panel information for this proceeding.
  • Petition grounds: I do not have information on the specific claims, prior art, or statutory basis (§ 102 / § 103 / § 112) for the petition.
  • Institution decision: I do not have information on the institution decision for this proceeding.
  • Final Written Decision (if issued): I do not have the specific claim-level verdict or the panel's reasoning.
  • Settlement / termination: I do not have information on any settlement or termination for this proceeding.
  • Appeal: I do not have information on any appeal to the Federal Circuit for this proceeding.
  • Defensive value: Similar to IPR2023-00050, without the details of the final written decision, it's not possible to definitively state the defensive value. The issuance of a final written decision indicates that a challenge was heard and a determination made, which could impact the patent's strength.

Strategic summary

Based on the provided information, both IPR2023-00050 and IPR2023-00481 have reached the "Final Written Decision" stage. However, the specific outcomes at a claim-level are not available in the provided patent text or the USPTO ODP API result snippet. Therefore, it is currently unknown which claims of US8377903 are CANCELED, SUSTAINED, or UNTESTED through these IPR proceedings. Without the detailed FWDs, it's impossible to assess the estoppel landscape or identify any patterns in petitioner behavior or patent owner's appeal aggressiveness.

Recommended next steps

To understand the full defensive value, it is crucial to obtain and review the Final Written Decisions for IPR2023-00050 and IPR2023-00481. These documents, publicly available on the USPTO PTAB Decisions website, will detail which claims were found unpatentable and the reasons for those decisions. This information is critical for any defendant to evaluate potential infringement theories and available prior-art grounds.

Generated 6/25/2026, 6:45:46 AM