Invalidity dossier

US 8279876

Data service apparatus and method in heterogeneous wireless networks

Current assignee: Samsung Electronics Co Ltd

Added 9/23/2026, 4:50:00 PM

At a glanceNo PTAB challengesNo litigation on file

Active provider: DeepSeek · deepseek-flash

Patent summary

Title, assignee, inventors, filing/issue dates, abstract, and a plain-language overview of the claims.

✓ Generated

Patent Overview: US 8,279,876 B2

Title: Data service apparatus and method in heterogeneous wireless networks

Assignee: Samsung Electronics Co., Ltd. (original assignee also [Samsung Electronics Co.](/litigations/by-defendant/Samsung%20Electronics%20Co.), Ltd.)

Key dates: Priority date 2005-10-14; filing date 2006-10-16; publication date (grant) 2012-10-02; legal status listed as "Expired – Fee Related," with an adjusted expiration of 2030-06-04. Publication US20070116012A1 appeared 2007-05-24.

Inventors: Young-Bin Chang, Eun-Taek Lim, Jung-Min Ro, Jae-Hyuk Jang, Dong-Seek Park, Young-Kwon Cho, and Joon-Young Choi. Application number US11/581,308.

Purpose: The patent addresses radio environments mixing multiple heterogeneous wireless networks (e.g., 2G/3G cellular such as WCDMA/HSDPA/CDMA2000/1×EVDO/1×EVDV, WMAN/IEEE 802.16, and WLAN/IEEE 802.11). Stated objects are to provide a data service to a Mobile Station (MS) concurrently through multiple heterogeneous networks, deliver a seamless data service, ensure Quality of Service (QoS), prevent frequent handoffs, and reduce signaling overhead caused by frequent handoffs.

Plain-language scope: Rather than switching the MS to a single best network via vertical handoff or radio reconfiguration, an "IP sublayer" distributes IP packets from an IP layer across one or more accessible wireless networks, delivering each distributed packet to the corresponding network's MAC layer. At the MS, MAC layers of different networks feed an IP sublayer that recombines received IP subpackets into an IP packet for the IP layer. Related methods cover: determining accessible networks and distributing IP packets; an MS measuring and reporting channel qualities, receiving subpackets, and recombining them; DL transmission coordinated by an IP packet controller; and UL transmission where the MS reports channel quality and data amount, the controller sends an uplink scheduling control message, and networks send channel allocation messages. Classifications include H04W48/18, H04L69/14, H04W28/06, and H04W80/04. Figures 2–10 depict architecture, protocol stack, IP sublayer functions, packet division/combination, and DL/UL flow procedures.

Source: https://patents.google.com/patent/US8279876/en

Not established by the excerpt: The full claims, complete specification text, detailed embodiments, and any independent verification of legal status, assignee accuracy, or dates are not established here; the excerpt states these are assumptions or partial content.

Generated 10/1/2026, 9:44:07 PM

Cases on file (0)

Specific litigation cases in our database that name US patent 8279876. The free-form analysis below may also discuss cases beyond this list.

No cases on file mention this patent. Upload a CSV or add a case manually in Admin → Manage litigation cases.

Litigation summary

Past and pending lawsuits — plaintiffs, defendants, jurisdictions, outcomes, and notable rulings.

Log in to generate
Not generated yet. Log in to request this analysis.

Proceedings on file (0)

All PTAB activity →

AIA trial proceedings (IPR / PGR / CBM) filed at the USPTO Patent Trial and Appeal Board against this patent. Sourced from the USPTO Open Data Portal and refreshed every six hours; each proceeding number deep-links to the PTAB E2E docket.

No PTAB proceedings on file. This patent has not been challenged via IPR, PGR, or CBM. The absence is itself a signal — well-asserted patents eventually attract IPRs. The LLM analysis below may surface filings the ODP feed hasn’t indexed yet.

PTAB challenges

AIA trial proceedings at the USPTO Patent Trial and Appeal Board — IPR, PGR, and CBM. Petitioners, judge panels, claim-level invalidation outcomes from Final Written Decisions, and Federal Circuit appeals. The single most important defensive datapoint after litigation history.

Log in to generate
Not generated yet. Log in to request this analysis.

Assignment history

Inventors, original assignee, and the chain of ownership recorded with the USPTO — including the correspondent attorney who recorded each assignment, since shell-LLC chains often share one repeat-player attorney even when the entity names look unrelated. Surfaces NPE / patent-troll patterns: shell-entity transfers, known asserters in the chain, repeat correspondent fingerprints, pre-litigation assignments, and bankruptcy fire-sales.

Log in to generate
Not generated yet. Log in to request this analysis.

Prior art

Earlier patents, publications, and products that may anticipate or render the claims unpatentable.

Log in to generate
Not generated yet. Log in to request this analysis.

Obviousness

Combinations of prior art that suggest the claimed invention would have been obvious under 35 U.S.C. § 103.

Log in to generate
Not generated yet. Log in to request this analysis.

Extensions

Patent term adjustments, term extensions, continuations, divisionals, family members, and expiration dates.

Log in to generate
Not generated yet. Log in to request this analysis.

Derivative works

Defensive disclosure: derivative variations of each claim designed to render future incremental improvements obvious or non-novel.

Log in to generate
Not generated yet. Log in to request this analysis.