Invalidity dossier

US 8219061

Method and system for obtaining emergency caller location

Current assignee: Lab Technology LLC

Added 9/23/2026, 12:56:22 PM

At a glanceNo PTAB challengesNo litigation on file

Active provider: DeepSeek · deepseek-flash

Patent summary

Title, assignee, inventors, filing/issue dates, abstract, and a plain-language overview of the claims.

✓ Generated

Patent Overview — US8219061B1

Title: Method and system for obtaining emergency caller location
Patent number: US8219061B1
Application number: US13/206,522
Filing date: 2011-08-10
Publication (grant) date: 2012-07-10
Prior art date / priority date: 2005-07-14 (described in the source as an assumption, not a legal conclusion)
Inventor(s): Chi Fai Ho; Shin Cheung Simon Chiu
Original assignee: TP Lab Inc.
Current assignee (per source, which notes listed assignees may be inaccurate): Lab Technology LLC
Status: Active; anticipated expiration listed as 2027-05-17
Source: https://patents.google.com/patent/[US8219061](/patent/US8219061)/en

Purpose
The patent relates generally to telecommunications, and more specifically to providing location information for voice calls. The excerpt frames the problem through emergency calling: in traditional residential telephone service, a service provider assigns a telephone number, allocates an access line, and records the telephone number and subscription location (typically the street address) in an Automatic Location identity (ALI) database, which a 911 selective router and Public Safety Answering Point (PSAP) use to locate and dispatch emergency services. That assumption breaks down for VoIP service, because an IP telephone can be connected at a home gateway, a neighbor's cable modem gateway, or a hotel network, so the caller's actual location may differ from the registered subscription location.

Plain-language scope (from the excerpt)
Embodiments include systems and methods for obtaining a caller's location during a telephone call. A phone system obtains the subscriber access line identity of a subscriber access line and sends it to a subscriber location query system, which returns a subscriber location or subscriber location record. Subscriber phone equipment or a phone can store a subscriber access line identity; the stored identity can be used to retrieve the subscriber location record, comparing known-location data against identities obtained during calls to determine whether the subscriber phone equipment has changed location. Emergency call capabilities of a subscriber access line are determined by an emergency call test module sending a test signal or query.

What the excerpt does not establish
The supplied text is explicitly marked as an excerpt with omitted portions. It supplies no claim language, no complete written description, and no figures. It does not establish the full claimed scope, the specific test signal or query contents, or the detailed operation of the location query system.

Generated 10/1/2026, 9:53:23 PM

Cases on file (0)

Specific litigation cases in our database that name US patent 8219061. The free-form analysis below may also discuss cases beyond this list.

No cases on file mention this patent. Upload a CSV or add a case manually in Admin → Manage litigation cases.

Litigation summary

Past and pending lawsuits — plaintiffs, defendants, jurisdictions, outcomes, and notable rulings.

Log in to generate
Not generated yet. Log in to request this analysis.

Proceedings on file (0)

All PTAB activity →

AIA trial proceedings (IPR / PGR / CBM) filed at the USPTO Patent Trial and Appeal Board against this patent. Sourced from the USPTO Open Data Portal and refreshed every six hours; each proceeding number deep-links to the PTAB E2E docket.

No PTAB proceedings on file. This patent has not been challenged via IPR, PGR, or CBM. The absence is itself a signal — well-asserted patents eventually attract IPRs. The LLM analysis below may surface filings the ODP feed hasn’t indexed yet.

PTAB challenges

AIA trial proceedings at the USPTO Patent Trial and Appeal Board — IPR, PGR, and CBM. Petitioners, judge panels, claim-level invalidation outcomes from Final Written Decisions, and Federal Circuit appeals. The single most important defensive datapoint after litigation history.

Log in to generate
Not generated yet. Log in to request this analysis.

Assignment history

Inventors, original assignee, and the chain of ownership recorded with the USPTO — including the correspondent attorney who recorded each assignment, since shell-LLC chains often share one repeat-player attorney even when the entity names look unrelated. Surfaces NPE / patent-troll patterns: shell-entity transfers, known asserters in the chain, repeat correspondent fingerprints, pre-litigation assignments, and bankruptcy fire-sales.

Log in to generate
Not generated yet. Log in to request this analysis.

Prior art

Earlier patents, publications, and products that may anticipate or render the claims unpatentable.

Log in to generate
Not generated yet. Log in to request this analysis.

Obviousness

Combinations of prior art that suggest the claimed invention would have been obvious under 35 U.S.C. § 103.

Log in to generate
Not generated yet. Log in to request this analysis.

Extensions

Patent term adjustments, term extensions, continuations, divisionals, family members, and expiration dates.

Log in to generate
Not generated yet. Log in to request this analysis.

Derivative works

Defensive disclosure: derivative variations of each claim designed to render future incremental improvements obvious or non-novel.

Log in to generate
Not generated yet. Log in to request this analysis.