Invalidity dossier

US 819866

Sheet-metal joint.

Current assignee: MICHIGAN MACHINERY MANUFACTURING Co

Added 9/23/2026, 10:33:33 PM

At a glanceNo PTAB challengesNo litigation on file

Active provider: DeepSeek · deepseek-flash

Patent summary

Title, assignee, inventors, filing/issue dates, abstract, and a plain-language overview of the claims.

✓ Generated

Patent Overview — US819866A

Title: Sheet-Metal Joint

Patent number: US819866A

Inventor: John E. Dobson, of Ypsilanti, Michigan

Assignee: Michigan Machinery Manufacturing Company, of Ypsilanti, Michigan, a corporation of Michigan

Application number: US24255405A

Filing/priority date: January 24, 1905

Publication (grant) date: May 8, 1906

Legal status (as listed): Expired – Lifetime; anticipated expiration May 8, 1923 (the source states legal status is an assumption, not a legal conclusion)

Purpose: To obtain a flush joint between sections of sheet metal, formed without brazing or welding, in which the adjoining sections cannot become detached from each other. It is described as particularly designed for metallic rings such as are used in stove construction.

Plain-language scope: Two flat sheet-metal sections (A, B) have complementary teeth (a) and notches (b) on their adjoining edges. The teeth of one section are slipped into the notches of the other so they intermesh and interlock, holding the sections against displacement in the plane of the blank but still permitting disengagement by relative lateral movement. The blank is then bent into a curved cross-section, preferably between dies (C, D). Because this bending is transverse to the line of the joint, the adjoining tooth faces are no longer parallel but lie at an angle to one another, so each tooth locks the others against lateral movement and the sections cannot be disengaged. Where a ring is made, the blank is first formed into a plain hoop with edges joined, then drawn into the curved cross-section. Four claims are presented, covering: complementary teeth intermeshing in different planes and locking the sections from movement in any direction with a joint thickness equal to the tooth thickness; teeth whose opposite edges lie in different planes; interlocked tooth pairs whose planes are out of angle along the joint line; and a joint whose longitudinal line is curved.

Source: https://patents.google.com/patent/[US819866](/patent/US819866)/en

What the excerpt does not establish: It does not establish litigation, ownership transfers, validity, or the content/effect of prior art. Figure text and the Fig. 6 modification are only partially legible; the excerpt does not detail the modified construction or the omitted portions of the cited-by list.

Generated 10/1/2026, 9:33:17 PM

Cases on file (0)

Specific litigation cases in our database that name US patent 819866. The free-form analysis below may also discuss cases beyond this list.

No cases on file mention this patent. Upload a CSV or add a case manually in Admin → Manage litigation cases.

Litigation summary

Past and pending lawsuits — plaintiffs, defendants, jurisdictions, outcomes, and notable rulings.

Log in to generate
Not generated yet. Log in to request this analysis.

Proceedings on file (0)

All PTAB activity →

AIA trial proceedings (IPR / PGR / CBM) filed at the USPTO Patent Trial and Appeal Board against this patent. Sourced from the USPTO Open Data Portal and refreshed every six hours; each proceeding number deep-links to the PTAB E2E docket.

No PTAB proceedings on file. This patent has not been challenged via IPR, PGR, or CBM. The absence is itself a signal — well-asserted patents eventually attract IPRs. The LLM analysis below may surface filings the ODP feed hasn’t indexed yet.

PTAB challenges

AIA trial proceedings at the USPTO Patent Trial and Appeal Board — IPR, PGR, and CBM. Petitioners, judge panels, claim-level invalidation outcomes from Final Written Decisions, and Federal Circuit appeals. The single most important defensive datapoint after litigation history.

Log in to generate
Not generated yet. Log in to request this analysis.

Assignment history

Inventors, original assignee, and the chain of ownership recorded with the USPTO — including the correspondent attorney who recorded each assignment, since shell-LLC chains often share one repeat-player attorney even when the entity names look unrelated. Surfaces NPE / patent-troll patterns: shell-entity transfers, known asserters in the chain, repeat correspondent fingerprints, pre-litigation assignments, and bankruptcy fire-sales.

Log in to generate
Not generated yet. Log in to request this analysis.

Prior art

Earlier patents, publications, and products that may anticipate or render the claims unpatentable.

Log in to generate
Not generated yet. Log in to request this analysis.

Obviousness

Combinations of prior art that suggest the claimed invention would have been obvious under 35 U.S.C. § 103.

Log in to generate
Not generated yet. Log in to request this analysis.

Extensions

Patent term adjustments, term extensions, continuations, divisionals, family members, and expiration dates.

Log in to generate
Not generated yet. Log in to request this analysis.

Derivative works

Defensive disclosure: derivative variations of each claim designed to render future incremental improvements obvious or non-novel.

Log in to generate
Not generated yet. Log in to request this analysis.