Invalidity dossier

US 8139098

Video communication method for receiving person at entrance

Current assignee: SB IP Holdings, LLC

Added 9/23/2026, 9:37:15 PM

At a glanceNo PTAB challenges1 lawsuit on fileasserted by SB IP Holdings, LLC

Active provider: DeepSeek · deepseek-flash

Patent summary

Title, assignee, inventors, filing/issue dates, abstract, and a plain-language overview of the claims.

✓ Generated

Patent Overview: US 8,139,098 B2

Title: "Video communication method for receiving person at entrance"

Source: https://patents.google.com/patent/US8139098/en

Bibliographic data (per supplied text):

  • Patent number: US 8,139,098 B2
  • Application number: US 11/618,621
  • Filing date: 2006-12-29
  • Publication date (grant): 2012-03-20
  • Earliest priority date listed: 2002-10-15; priority also claimed from US 10/682,185 (2003-10-09)
  • Inventor: Ronald Carter
  • Original assignee: Revolutionary Concepts Inc.
  • Current assignee listed: SB IP Holdings LLC (the source notes listed assignees "may be inaccurate")
  • Legal status: Active – Reinstated; adjusted expiration listed as 2027-07-28
  • Classifications include H04N 7/14 (two-way video terminals), H04M 11/025 (door telephones), and H04N 7/18 (CCTV systems)

Purpose and plain-language scope (from the excerpted Definitions):
The invention relates generally to a system for receiving a person at an entrance, such as a home or business, though the text states it is not limited to that context.

The described audio-video communication system comprises three main elements:

  1. A wireless exterior module located proximate an entrance, including a proximity sensor to detect a person, a video camera to record the person's image, a microphone and speaker for audio to/from the person, and a transmitter and receiver for communicating sounds and images.
  2. A computerized controller disposed in wireless electronic communication with the exterior module via that transmitter and receiver, running a software application.
  3. A remote peripheral device.

What the excerpt does not establish:
The supplied text is truncated mid-sentence ("the computerize[d]…"). It contains no claims, no full written description, and no prior-art discussion. It therefore does not establish the specific claim scope, the role of the remote peripheral device, the method steps implied by the title, or any validity determination. Per the operating rules, litigation, ownership transfers, validity, and prior art are not addressed here.

Generated 10/1/2026, 9:34:09 PM

Cases on file (1)

Group view →

Specific litigation cases in our database that name US patent 8139098. The free-form analysis below may also discuss cases beyond this list.

Litigation summary

Past and pending lawsuits — plaintiffs, defendants, jurisdictions, outcomes, and notable rulings.

Log in to generate
Not generated yet. Log in to request this analysis.

Proceedings on file (0)

All PTAB activity →

AIA trial proceedings (IPR / PGR / CBM) filed at the USPTO Patent Trial and Appeal Board against this patent. Sourced from the USPTO Open Data Portal and refreshed every six hours; each proceeding number deep-links to the PTAB E2E docket.

Current assignee: SB IP Holdings, LLC

No PTAB proceedings on file. This patent has not been challenged via IPR, PGR, or CBM. The absence is itself a signal — well-asserted patents eventually attract IPRs. The LLM analysis below may surface filings the ODP feed hasn’t indexed yet.

PTAB challenges

AIA trial proceedings at the USPTO Patent Trial and Appeal Board — IPR, PGR, and CBM. Petitioners, judge panels, claim-level invalidation outcomes from Final Written Decisions, and Federal Circuit appeals. The single most important defensive datapoint after litigation history.

Log in to generate
Not generated yet. Log in to request this analysis.

Assignment history

Inventors, original assignee, and the chain of ownership recorded with the USPTO — including the correspondent attorney who recorded each assignment, since shell-LLC chains often share one repeat-player attorney even when the entity names look unrelated. Surfaces NPE / patent-troll patterns: shell-entity transfers, known asserters in the chain, repeat correspondent fingerprints, pre-litigation assignments, and bankruptcy fire-sales.

Log in to generate
Not generated yet. Log in to request this analysis.

Prior art

Earlier patents, publications, and products that may anticipate or render the claims unpatentable.

Log in to generate
Not generated yet. Log in to request this analysis.

Obviousness

Combinations of prior art that suggest the claimed invention would have been obvious under 35 U.S.C. § 103.

Log in to generate
Not generated yet. Log in to request this analysis.

Extensions

Patent term adjustments, term extensions, continuations, divisionals, family members, and expiration dates.

Log in to generate
Not generated yet. Log in to request this analysis.

Derivative works

Defensive disclosure: derivative variations of each claim designed to render future incremental improvements obvious or non-novel.

Log in to generate
Not generated yet. Log in to request this analysis.

Keep exploring

More patents asserted by SB IP Holdings, LLC

This patent in court (1)

1 tracked lawsuit name US 8139098.